New publications of our resource in 2026 The initial phase of collecting data on LCF, accumulated prior to the 20th century, is largely complete. Next, we plan to analyze and synthesize thematic information, adding data from the 20th and 21st centuries. The work will focus primarily on: prevention, diagnosis, arthroscopy, plastic surgery, and endoprosthetics. Marсh 21 , 2026 Great C ompilation. Chapter 43 Great Compilation. Chapter 44 Marсh 20 , 2026 Great C ompilation. Chapter 41 Great Compilation. Chapter 42 Marсh 19 , 2026 Great Compilation. Chapter 40 Marсh 18 , 2026 Great C ompilation. Chapter 38 Great Compilation. Chapter 39 Marсh 17 , 2026 Great Compilation. Chapter 37 Marсh 16 , 2026 Great C ompilation. Chapter 35 Great Compilation. Chapter 36 Marсh 15 , 2026 Great Compilation. Chapter 34 Marсh 14 , 2026 Great C ompilation. Chapter 32 Great Compilation. Chapter 33 Marсh 12 , 2026 Grea...
English version of the article: Архипов СВ. Книга Берешит как великая компиляция текстов и смыслов Второго переходного периода Египта: пилотная культурологическая, медицинская, археологическая и текстологическая экспертиза преданий против традиционной атрибуции. Введение. О круглой связке бедра. 14.02.2026. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 2026АрхиповСВ
The Book of Genesis as a Great Compilation of Texts and Meanings from the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt: A Pilot Culturological, Medical, Archaeological, and Textological Examination of the Legends versus Traditional Attribution. Chapter 44
By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD
CONTENT [i] Abstract [ii] Book of Genesis. Chapter 44 Analysis [iii] Notes to Chapter 44 [iv] AI Agent's Conclusion [v] Content [vi] External links [vii] Application |
The Book of Genesis (Bereshith) was composed in Egypt during the 17th century BCE and reached its definitive protographic form following the Minoan eruption of Thera. This study argues that the work was the result of a collaboration between an Egyptian polymath and a distinguished scribe of Asiatic descent. By analyzing ancient texts, anatomical descriptions, archaeological data, Bronze Age cultural history, and climatic markers, this article demonstrates that the book emerged from the work of a high-ranking socio-political committee within the Egyptian House of Life. We argue that the inclusion of precise anatomical data, such as the ligamentum capitis femoris, serves as a diagnostic marker of this Egyptian medical-scribal collaboration, challenging the late-date theories of the documentary hypothesis.
[ii] Book of Genesis. Chapter 44 Analysis
|
Excerpt from the
Book of Genesis (1922LeeserI:56-57)
|
Type of
similarity and justification |
Ancient Near
Eastern and Egyptian Contexts (Parallels, Analogies, Convergences,
Borrowings, and Inversions in Archaeology, Culture, Medical Knowledge, and
Historical Facts: Mesopotamia, the Levant, Anatolia, and the Nile Valley)
|
|
2 And my cup, the silver cup, thou shalt put
in the mouth of the sack of the youngest, and the money for his com. And he
did according to the word of Joseph which he had spoken. … 12 And he searched, at the eldest he began, and at the youngest he
left off; and the cup was found in Benjamin's sack. … 16
And Judah said, What shall we say unto my lord? what shall we speak? or how
shall we justify ourselves? God hath found out the iniquity of thy servants:
behold we are servants unto my lord, both we, as also he in whose hand the
cup was found. 17 And he said, God forbid that I should do this: the man in
whose hand the cup was found, he shall be my servant; and as for you, go you
up in peace unto your father.
|
Borrowing of the word «cup»
(etymology) |
A more plausible etymology for the
word is the Egyptian term for a «libation vessel», which first appears during
the Old Kingdom period (2021NoonanBJ:79–80). |
|
4 They were gone out of the city, not yet far
off, when Joseph said unto the superintendent of his house, Up, follow after
the men; and when thou hast overtaken them, say unto them, Wherefore have ye
returned evil for good? 5 Is not this out of which my lord drinketh, and
whereby indeed he divineth? ye have done evil in so doing. |
Practice of professional magic. The textual similarity is manifested in the mention of divination and
the use of magical attributes as an integral part of the competencies of a
high-ranking official, which corresponds to the Egyptian institution of the
khery-heb (lector priests). |
Egypt Pharaoh was expected to «have among his courtiers skilled diviners and
dream interpreters, so that they might warn him against any act displeasing
to the gods, ensuring he did not violate the decrees of Maat; and if, through
ignorance, he began to act contrary to the goddess's will, he would have time
to stop—as was the case with Pharaoh Khufu» (2007РакИ:135). This refers to the Middle Kingdom tale
«Cheops and the Magicians», contained in the «Westcar Papyrus» (1920ТураевБА:84). One of the modern titles of the tale is
«Pharaoh Khufu and the Sorcerers». It features the high priest-enchanter
Ubainer and Djadjamankh, as well as the commoner «sorcerer» Djedi (1956КацнельсонИС_МендельсонФЛ:38, 43). In another
translation of this tale, titled «King Cheops and the Wizards», the priestly
office is designated as «Chief Khery-heb» (1979ЛившицИГ_РубинштейнРИ:62). In «Three Tales of Wonder»
(Papyrus Westcar, Hyksos period) we read: «Go, bring me the chief
lector-priest, the scribe of books, Djadja-em-ankh! <…> Then the chief lector-priest Djadja-em-ankh
said his say of magic. … Then he said
his say of magic and returned the waters of the lake to their place.
(2006LichtheimM:1.216-217). The Magician Djedi [who is a great magician] lives
in Djed-Snefru. «He is a man of a hundred and ten years who eats five hundred
loaves of bread, half an ox for meat, and drinks one hundred jugs of beer to
this very day.» (2006LichtheimM:1.217-218). «Djedi said his say of magic: the
goose stood up and waddled <…> Djedi said his say of magic, and the ox
stood up.» (2006LichtheimM:1.219). In the tomb of Harkhuf,
Nomarch of Elephantine and contemporary of Pharaoh Merenre of the 6th
Dynasty, his title «Khery-heb» is mentioned, meaning «a priest who recited
magical formulas and acquired a reputation as a mage» (1915ТураевБА:49-50). An inscription on a slab (Vienna Museum №
172) dating to the Ptolemaic era mentions the «Chief Khery-heb and Royal
Scribe Benant» (1915ТураевБА:49-50,63). In the «Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus», written around 1825 BCE, case №
30 proposes a magical formula (2021LopesHT_PereiraRGG; intechopen.com). In case № 9 of the «Edwin Smith Papyrus»
(1650–1550 BCE), when presented with a clearly unfavorable prognosis, the
physician recommends a spell (1930BreastedJH:217; sae.saw-leipzig.de). The «Pyramid Texts», dating to 2350–2175 BCE, have preserved one of
the spells (№ 678, 2029a-2030c) of a mage-scribe compelled to contend with
others of his kind: «’Iḥmti, Śdmti, do not hearken to N.; do not listen to
N.; do not demand the magic of N.; do not ask for the magic of N. from N.
Thou hast thy magic; N. has his magic. May N. not break thy pen; may he not crack
thy palette! May N. have (his)
offering!» (1952MercerSAB:490).
|
|
5 Is not this out of which my lord drinketh, and whereby indeed he
divineth? ye have done evil in so doing. … 7 And they said unto him.
Wherefore will my lord speak such words as these ? God forbid that thy
servants should do any thing like this. Similarly: 44:8-9,16,18-20,22,24
|
Diplomatic Onomastics of Status. The similarity is observed in the strict adherence to Near Eastern
court protocol, where the emphasized self-deprecation of the petitioner
before a high-ranking official served as a mandatory legal and ethical norm
of official dialogue. |
Mesopotamia In the
letters from the royal archives of Mari, the form of address «my lord» was
traditionally employed. Ashmada writes to Zimri-Lim on tablet ARM 34 163:
«Speak to my lord: Thus says Ashmat, your servant. I have listened to the
tablet which my lord commanded me to carry. My lord sent me a message saying:
Join the Bedouins...» (1988CharpinD:184, archibab.fr). In another letter (ARM 35 157), we
read: «Speak to my lord: Thus says Yasmah-Addu, your servant. Lakhun-Dagan
has undertaken to do this with my lord...» (1988CharpinD:183, archibab.fr). In a letter (ARM 26/2 290) from
Usur-awassu addressed to Yasmah-Addu, we find: «Speak to my lord: thus says
your servant Usur-awassu. Regarding the work on the statue, my lord wrote the
following to me...» (1988CharpinD_LafontB:26-27). The Mesopotamian archive of
Mari dates to the first half of the 18th century BCE (1956Munn-RankinJM:21, archibab.fr).
|
|
7 And they said unto him. Wherefore will my
lord speak such words as these ? God forbid that thy servants should do any
thing like this. Similarly:
44:9,10,16-19,21,23-24,27,30-33
|
Diplomatic identity. The established structural
similarity of rhetorical formulas «your servant» confirms the use in the Book
of Genesis of an authentic protocol of interstate and social correspondence
from the Middle Bronze Age. |
Mesopotamia The standard opening of vassal correspondence from the Mari archives
contains the formula «your servant». A letter from Kibri-Dagan to his lord
Zimri-Lim (ARM 26/1 210) states: «Say to my Lord: Thus (spoke) Kibri-Dagan,
your servant.» (1988CharpinD:439-440). A letter from Askudum and Rishiya to
their lord Zimri-Lim (ARM 26/1 11): «Say to our Lord: Thus speak Askudum and
Rishiya, your servants.» (1988CharpinD:107-109); A letter from Shibtu to her
lord Zimri-Lim (ARM 26/1 214): «Say to my Lord: Thus speaks Shibtu, your
servant: In the temple of Annunitum in the city of Ahatum, the servant of
Dagan-Malik prophesied and said the following…» (1988CharpinD:442-443). The Mesopotamian archive of Mari dates to the first half of the 18th
century BCE (1956Munn-RankinJM:106).
|
|
8 Behold the money, which we found in the
mouth of our sacks, we brought back unto thee out of the land of Canaan: how
then should we steal out of thy lord's house silver or gold? |
Ethnopolitical Isomorphism. The presence of the term «Canaan» is characteristic of diplomatic
correspondence and legal archives of the 18th–15th centuries BCE. |
Levant The inhabitants of Canaan are mentioned in a letter from Ashmad to
Askudum (Mari archive, ARM 26/1 24): «Send me a hundred Canaanites <…>
awaiting the arrival of the Canaanites» (1988CharpinD:152–154). In a letter
(ARM 26/1 140, Mari archive) from Nur-Addu addressed to Zimri-Lim,
«Yakhsib-El, the Canaanite» is mentioned (1988CharpinD:303–305). The
Mesopotamian archive of Mari dates to the first half of the 18th century BCE
(1956Munn-RankinJM:106). «It is thus evident that in mid-18th century BCE people called
"Canaanites" lived south of the kingdom of Qatna [south of Syria], i.e., in the
same arca where they are located in the Late Bronze Age.» (1994NaʾamanN:398). «The earliest occurrence of the geographical term [Canaan] outside the
Old Testament is in the Idrimi statue from Alalakh, which dates to about the
middle of the fifteenth century B.C.» (1961GibsonJC:217). «The word Canaan comes from Hurrian Kinahhu, which is attested by the
documents from Nuzi (15th century BCE) and which is supposed to be a Hurrian
word for the colour of purple.» (1991LemcheNP:26).
|
|
10 And he said. Now also let it be according
to your words: he with whom it is found shall be my servant; but ye shall be
blameless. |
Ethics and hygiene. A similar view of «purity» is observed, not merely as the absence of
contamination, but as a state of legal and spiritual integrity essential for
contact with the sacred. |
Egypt Pyramid of Pepi II (6th Dynasty, ca. 2246–2152 BCE) Recitation № 564:
«You will become clean in the Jackal Lake and be purged (of impurity) in the
Duat Lake.» (2007AllenJP:298). Plutarch (1st–2nd century), recounting the story of Isis and Osiris,
mentions the purification rites of Egyptian priests and their special
attitude toward clothing. In their vestments, they likened themselves to
Osiris, whose raiment «admits of no shadow or variegation, but is one simple
likeness of light; for the beginning is pure, and the primary and
intelligible is unmixed. Therefore, having once put on this garment, the
priests then remove it and keep it invisible and untouched» (1996Плутарх:4,5,77). According to Herodotus (5th century BCE), priests in Egypt were
meticulous about cleanliness: «Every three days the priests shave the hair on
their bodies... Twice a day and twice a night they perform ablutions in cold
water and, in short, observe a multitude of other rites.» Furthermore, all
Egyptians wash their dishes and «wear linen garments, always freshly
laundered» (1972Геродот:2.37). «All priests were obliged to meticulously maintain cleanliness,
especially during sacrifices. <…> Ceremonial purity, however, was
mandatory in all periods and was considered no less important than moral
holiness. Even a layman could not enter the temples without having carefully
purified himself» (2021МюллерМ:203-204). The action resembles the Ancient Egyptian purification ritual from the
«Turin Papyrus CGT 54050», composed during the 19th Dynasty, i.e., in
1307–1196 BCE (2002BunsonMR; sae.saw-leipzig.de). In «The Admonitions of Ipuwer» (12th Dynasty), we find: «Remember the
erecting of flagstaffs, the carving of offering stones; the priest cleansing
the chapels, the temple whitewashed like milk; sweetening the fragrance of
the sanctuary, setting up the bread- offerings. Remember the observing of
rules, the adjusting of dates, removing one who enters the priestly service
unclean; for to do this is wrong,» (2006LichtheimM:1.159). In «The Story of Sinuhe» (Middle Kingdom), it is stated: «I was
shaved; my hair was combed. Thus was my squalor returned to the foreign land,
my dress to the Sand-farers. I was clothed in fine linen; I was anointed with
fine oil. I slept on a bed. I had returned the sand to those who dwell in it,
the tree-oil to those who grease themselves with it.» (2006LichtheimM:1.233).
|
|
12 And he searched, at the eldest he began,
and at the youngest he left off; and the cup was found in Benjamin's sack. |
Ethno-Onomastic Authenticity The similarity is manifested
in the use of the name «Benjamin» (Binyamin) as a documented anthroponym and
ethnonym within the Near East during the Middle Bronze Age.
|
Mesopotamia The correspondence from the Mari archives mentions the Benjaminite
tribes, their kings, and princes, who lived in proximity to the Bedouins of
Canaan. Specifically, the author of a letter (ARM 26/1 282) reminds
Zimri-Lim: «Two Canaanites must be brought alive to the border and mutilated
there. They must go alive to the Benjaminites and tell them that my Lord has
captured the city of Mishlan by force...» (1988CharpinD:582-583,
archibab.fr). A certain Ishi-Addu, in a letter (ARM 26/1 121), conveys the
words of oracles: «Go to Dur-Yahdun-Lim and verify the prophecies concerning
the inhabitants of Qatna and the Zalmakkum, relating to the Benjaminites. If,
when Zimri-Lim and his troops set out on a campaign... the Benjaminites will
surely form a solid block with their forces and [...] and besiege
Dur-Yahdun-Lim» (1988CharpinD:287-288, archibab.fr). The Mesopotamian archive
of Mari dates to the first half of the 18th century BCE
(1956Munn-RankinJM:106).
|
|
13 Then they rent their clothes, and every
one loaded his ass, and they returned to the city. See note!
|
Ritual-demonstrative similarity. The act of rending garments
by Reuben and Jacob as an expression of extreme despair and protest fully
aligns with the protocol for the public expression of grief and indignation
recorded in the diplomatic correspondence of the 18th-century BCE Mari
archives. |
Mesopotamia In the royal archives of Mari, a letter (ARM 26/2 370) from Yarim-Addu
to his lord Zimri-Lim was discovered, reporting a protest by Elamite
messengers: «These messengers [did not stop shouting] at the palace gates;
they rent their garments with their own hands». One of the protesters is
asked: «Why do you constantly shout at the palace gates and rend your
garments?» (1988CharpinD_LafontB:175-177, archibab.fr). The Mesopotamian archive of
Mari dates to the first half of the 18th century BCE (1956Munn-RankinJM:106).
|
|
17 And he said, God forbid that I should do
this: the man in whose hand the cup was found, he shall be my servant; and as
for you, go you up in peace unto your father.
|
Diplomatic Immunity. The identity of the speech construction (formulaic expression)
codifies the subject’s transition into the status of a «protected ally»,
thereby providing a legal guarantee of his personal safety and sovereign
protection within a foreign jurisdiction.
|
Egypt Pyramid
Texts (2350-2175 BCE) in Utterance № 697 (2170b): «"Come in peace",
say the Two Enneads to thee.» (1952MercerSAB:518). Pyramid of Unis (5th Dynasty, ca. 2353-2323 BCE) Recitation
№ 165: «Look,
she is coming, the beautiful West, to meet you, to meet you with her
beautiful tresses, and she is saying: “Welcome, you to whom I gave birth,
with rising horn, eye-painted pillar, bull of the sky: your form is
distinguished; pass in peace, for I have joined you”—so says the beautiful
West about Unis.» (2007AllenJP:44).
|
|
18 Then Judah came near unto him, and said.
Pardon, my lord, let thy servant, I pray thee, speak a word in my lord's
ears, and let not thy anger bum against thy servant; for thou art even as
Pharaoh. |
Borrowing the word «Pharaoh» |
An Egyptian word that originally designated the palace or the
residence of the king and his administration. By the 12th Dynasty, it became
associated with the three wishes following the royal name (life, prosperity,
health), and by the New Kingdom, the term began to be used as a title for the
king himself (2021NoonanBJ:183).
|
|
20 And we said unto my lord, We have an old
father, and a little child born in his old age ; and his brother is dead, and
he alone is left of his mother, and his father loveth him.
|
The Institution of Filial Succession. The similarity is observed in the depiction of the son as an
existentially vital assistant and successor, whose absence is perceived as a
catastrophic event for the family. |
Egypt «The Instruction of
Ptahhotep» (the latter part of the 6th Dynasty): «May this servant be ordered
to make a staff of old age, So as to tell him the words of those who heard,
The ways of the ancestors, Who have listened to the gods.»
(2006LichtheimM:1.63); Another translation «The Instruction of Ptahhotep»
states: «Let this servant be ordered to acquire a staff of old age, that I
may tell him the words of those who heard the counsels of the ancestors»
(2001КоростовцевМА:39).
|
|
30 And now, when I come to thy servant my
father, and the lad be not with us ; seeing that his life is bound up in the
lad's life ; |
Anthropological dualism. There is a similarity in the
reflection of a shared concept of the «soul» as a distinct vital principle.
|
Egypt Pyramid of Pepi I (6th
Dynasty, ca. 2289–2255 BCE) Recitation № 318 «Hey, Sun! Now, that which you said, Sun — “Oh
for a son,” so you said, Sun, “ba, in control, esteemed, with active arms
(and wide stride” — here is Pepi, Sun. Pepi is your son: Pepi is ba, Pepi is
esteemed, Pepi is in control, Pepi’s arms are active), this Pepi’s stride is
wide.»
(2007AllenJP:123). Recitation № 319 «Ho, Pepi! You shall become ba as the bas of
Heliopolis, you shall become ba as the bas of Nekhen, you shall become ba as
the bas of Pe, you shall become ba as the living star at the fore of his
brothers.» (2007AllenJP:124). An important concept: «Ba = «divine power», «soul»
(2006LichtheimM:1.245). Coffin Texts (2134-2040 BCE) Spell № 77
«I am this soul of Shu which is in the Hamel of the fiery blast which Atum
kindled with his own hand.» (1973FaulknerRO:80). We also read in the Coffin Texts, Spell
№ 96 «I have crossed the west of the sky, I have traversed the east of the
sky, it is Re who made my soul for me, and it is I who made a soul for Re.» (1973FaulknerRO:95).
In «The Dispute between a
Man and His Ba» (12th Dynasty),
a similar concept is employed in the phrase: «My ba shall not go, It
shall attend to me in this!» (2006LichtheimM:1.164). «Three Tales of Wonder»
(Papyrus Westcar, Hyksos period) we read: «May your ba know the way that
leads to the portal that conceals the dead. Thus greetings to a prince!»
(2006LichtheimM:1.218). In «The
Story of Sinuhe» (Middle Kingdom), it is stated: «My ba was gone, my
limbs trembled; my heart was not in my body, I did not know life from death.»
(2006LichtheimM:1.231).
|
A burial dating back to the early First Dynasty (c. 3000 BC) contains the «earliest direct evidence of use of donkeys for transport rather than for meat. They also provide the earliest secure, non-size-based evidence for domestic donkeys.» (2008RosselS_O'ConnorD). In the mastaba at Tarkhan (First Dynasty, c. 2850 BC) a grave was found containing the skeletons of three donkeys «these were the favourite animals buried with the master, much as the house¬ hold were buried with the kings of this age.» (1914PetrieWMF). The most likely ancestors of the domestic donkey are the African wild asses (2004Beja-PereiraA_LuikartG).
(The conclusion compiled by the AI agent, with our minor changes)
Preliminary Conclusion to the Analysis of Genesis Chapter 44
Sacred
Magic and Administrative Authority
The use of
the term «cup» in Genesis 44:2, which possesses an Egyptian etymology
(referring to a «libation vessel») documented as early as the Old Kingdom,
indicates a profound anchoring of the lexicon within the Egyptian cultic
environment. This demonstrates that the author of the text utilized technical
terms characteristic of the Egyptian administrative system prior to the 1st
millennium BCE.
History
and Professional Magic:
The
practice of cup divination (lecanomancy) attributed to Joseph (Gen. 44:5) fully
corresponds to the Egyptian institution of the khery-heb (lector priests). As
evidenced by the Westcar Papyrus (recorded during the Hyksos period) and
inscriptions from the 6th Dynasty (Harkhuf), mastery of magic was a mandatory
competency for high-ranking officials and advisors to the Pharaoh. Magical
formulas were regarded as legitimate instruments of governance and the
protection of the state order (Maat).
Medicine
and Textual Criticism:
The
synchronization of magical practices with medical texts, such as the Edwin
Smith Papyrus (1650–1550 BCE) and the Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus (ca. 1825
BCE), confirms that during the Middle Bronze Age, magic and science (medicine)
were inextricably linked. The mention of magic within the context of Joseph’s
high administrative status reflects the actual social conditions of the Second
Intermediate Period. The synthesis of data from the Westcar Papyrus and medical
treatises of the 17th century BCE firmly anchors the image of the «magician-official»
to the era of Hyksos rule and the early 18th Dynasty.
Diplomatic
Protocol and Social Hierarchy
Linguistics
and Textual Parallels: The speech of Judah and his brothers in Genesis 44 («your
servant,» «my lord») is a flawless reflection of the Amorite diplomatic style.
The use of the formula «your servant» (as a humble self-designation) in
response to a high official is identical to the standard openings of vassal
correspondence found in the Mari archives (18th century BCE). This demonstrates
that the biblical narrative preserves an authentic protocol of interstate and
social communication from the Middle Bronze Age.
History
and Diplomacy:
Synchronization
with the letters of Kibri-Dagan and Queen Shibtu to Zimri-Lim confirms that the
emphasized self-deprecation of a petitioner before authority was not merely a
literary device, but a legal norm. Genesis 44 exhibits an intimate knowledge of
the etiquette nuances characteristic of the Amorite dynasties and the Hyksos
period, when such rhetorical structures were at the height of their usage. The
presence of identical formulas in documents from the first half of the 18th
century BCE (Mari) and their organic integration into the biblical dialogue
affirm the historical depth of the text.
Ethnopolitics
and Ritual Integrity
The
reference to «Canaan» in Genesis 44:8 as a self-evident geographical and
political entity fully aligns with the diplomatic nomenclature of the 18th–15th
centuries BCE. Data from the Mari archives (mentioning «Canaanites» and «Yakhsib-El
the Canaanite») and the Idrimi statue from Alalakh (15th century BCE) confirm
that during this period, the term was already widely used in international
correspondence to designate territories south of Syria. This rule out a late
anachronistic insertion and anchors the text within the political geography of
the Middle and Late Bronze Ages.
Ethics
and Hygiene: The
brothers' defensive reaction to the accusation of theft reflects the Egyptian
concept of «purity» (ab) as a synthesis of moral and physical states. As
demonstrated in «The Story of Sinuhe» and «The Admonitions of Ipuwer» (Middle
Kingdom), interaction with the Egyptian administration required ritual
purification—shaving, the removal of «foreign squalor,» and the donning of fine
linen. In Chapter 44, the accusation of stealing a sacred vessel is not merely
a legal matter but a threat to this state of «purity» essential for contact
with the sacred authority of the state.
Archaeology
and Textual Criticism: The purification rites documented by Herodotus and Plutarch find their
authentic prototypes in the Pyramid Texts (6th Dynasty) and Middle Kingdom
literature. The consistency of these requirements for «purity» in both the
biblical narrative and Egyptian sources underscores the historical accuracy of
the narrative's cultural background.
Ethno-Onomastic
Authenticity
The name of
Joseph’s youngest brother (Benjamin) finds a direct and unique parallel in the
name of the powerful tribal confederation DUMU.MEŠ-Ya-mi-na (Binu-Yamina),
documented in the Mari archives (18th century BCE). The structural identity of
the name («son of the right hand/south») and its presence within the Semitic
environment of the Middle Bronze Age indicate that this onomastic unit was an
organic and widespread element in the region long before the formation of the
Israelite kingdom. The Mari texts (from the era of Zimri-Lim) describe the
Benjaminites as an active political force operating in close contact with the
Canaanites and the inhabitants of Qatna. This fully aligns with the
geographical and ethnic context of Genesis 44, where the brothers arrive specifically
from Canaan. The mention of Benjaminite «kings and princes» in official
correspondence confirms the high status of this group within the
Mesopotamian-Levantine arena of the 18th–17th centuries BCE. The presence of
such a specific ethnonym/anthroponym as «Benjamin» in documents dating to the
first half of the 18th century BCE serves as a compelling argument for the
historicity of the original tradition. The text of the Book of Genesis
preserves terminology characteristic of the Middle Bronze Age, making its late
origin without reliance on an ancient, authentic substratum highly improbable.
Ritual-Demonstrative
Similarity:
The act of
rending garments by the brothers (Gen. 44:13) as a public expression of extreme
despair and protest finds an exact parallel in the diplomatic practices of the
Mari archives (18th century BCE). A letter from Yarim-Addu to Zimri-Lim (ARM
26/2 370) describes identical behavior by Elamite messengers at the palace
gates. This confirms that the Genesis text records an authentic protocol for
the public manifestation of indignation characteristic of Semitic peoples
during the Middle Bronze Age.
Diplomatic
Immunity:
The
formulaic expressions of «passing in peace» (Gen. 44:17) are functionally
identical to Egyptian greetings found in the Pyramid Texts and the tomb of Unis
(5th–6th Dynasties). In Ancient Near Eastern legal culture, this was not merely
a well-wish but a formal legal act granting a subject the status of a «protected
ally,» providing a guarantee of personal safety within a foreign jurisdiction.
This highlights the sophisticated diplomatic layering and legal authenticity of
the narrative.
Linguistic
Chronology (Pharaoh):
The use of
the term «Pharaoh» in the patriarchal narrative corresponds to its historical
evolution from the Egyptian word for «Great House» (palace/administration).
While it became associated with royal health formulas during the 12th Dynasty,
its application in Chapter 44 reflects the central administration of power,
which is consistent with the terminology of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos
period before it became a personal title for the king in the New Kingdom.
The
Institution of Filial Succession:
The
depiction of Benjamin in Genesis 44:20–31 as the indispensable condition for
his elderly father’s survival directly corresponds to the Egyptian concept of
the «staff of old age» (iwt n iau). In «The Instruction of Ptahhotep» (Middle
Kingdom), this status implies not only physical assistance but the transmission
of ancestral wisdom and the preservation of the family line. Judah’s speech
employs this exact sociocultural code: for Jacob, the absence of his youngest
son is not merely the loss of a child, but an ontological catastrophe that
leads to the physical and spiritual demise of the family head.
Anthropological
Dualism:
The
biblical expression «his soul is bound up with the lad’s soul» (Gen. 44:30) and
the description of profound emotional shock mirror the Egyptian understanding
of the Ba (soul) as an active, vital principle. In «The Story of Sinuhe» and «The
Dispute between a Man and His Ba» (12th Dynasty), identical psychological states
are documented: during moments of intense turmoil, a person’s «Ba departs,» and
their «heart is no longer in the body.» The use of this metaphor in Genesis 44
testifies to the adoption of an Egyptian psycho-spiritual model prevalent in
the literature of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos period.
Chronology
and Textual Criticism:
Anchoring
these philosophical and ethical concepts to the Westcar Papyrus (Hyksos era)
and texts of the 12th–13th Dynasties confirms that this layer of Chapter 44 was
shaped within the intellectual environment of the 18th–17th centuries BCE. The
synchronization of the biblical description of «intertwined souls» with the
Egyptian metaphysical definition of the Ba strengthens the case for a 1600s BCE
dating, specifically aligning with the era of the Second Intermediate Period.
General
Conclusion
The
research has identified a critical density of ethnographic, linguistic, and
legal markers that preclude a late literary reconstruction and confirm the
origin of this textual layer within the authentic environment of the Middle
Bronze Age.
Magico-Administrative
Isomorphism: The portrayal of Joseph as a high-ranking official practicing the
art of cup divination (lecanomancy) fully corresponds to the Egyptian
institution of the khery-heb (lector priests). The practice of professional
magic as a legitimate instrument of state governance is documented in Middle
Kingdom and Hyksos-period sources (e.g., the Westcar Papyrus), rendering
Joseph’s functional role historically plausible for an Egyptian court of the
2nd millennium BCE.
Diplomatic
and Legal Authenticity: The speech etiquette («your servant,» «my lord»), the
ritual gestures of protest (rending of garments), and the use of the ethnonym «Canaan»
demonstrate a flawless alignment with the international protocol recorded in
the Mari archives (18th century BCE). The text preserves a unique onomastic
stratum (the mention of Benjaminites in Mesopotamian correspondence)
characteristic of the Amorite-Hyksos cultural sphere.
Socio-Anthropological
Code: The ethical foundation of the chapter relies on the Egyptian concepts of
the «staff of old age» (iwt n iau) and the dualistic understanding of the Ba
(soul) as an active vital principle. These specific «Egyptianisms,» reflected
in the literary monuments of the 12th–13th Dynasties, indicate that the
psychological and value-based context of the narrative was formed within the
intellectual environment of the 18th–17th centuries BCE.
Final
Verdict
Based on
the synthesis of linguistic, legal, and cultural indicators, the final verdict
is established:
Chronological
Localization: 17th Century BCE (ca. 1650–1600 BCE).
Historical
Status: Chapter 44 represents a highly accurate recording of the realities of
Egypt’s Second Intermediate Period and Mesopotamia’s Old Babylonian period. The
text serves as an authentic archive of Ancient Near Eastern law and court
etiquette, preserving a unique fusion of Egyptian administrative terminology
and Semitic tribal traditions of the mid-2nd millennium BCE.
Sumer (c. 3300 – before 1900 BCE) britannica.com
The Old Kingdom of Egypt (c. 2543 – c. 2120 BCE) britannica.com
The Third Dynasty of Ur (22nd – 21st cent. BCE) britannica.com
The First Intermediate period of Egypt (c. 2118 – c. 1980 BCE) britannica.com
The Old Babylonian period of Egypt (2000 – 1595 BCE) onlinelibrary.wiley.com
The Middle Kingdom of Egypt (c. 1980 – c. 1760 BCE) britannica.com
The Second Intermediate period of Egypt (c. 1759 – c. 1539 BCE) britannica.com
The New Kingdom of Egypt (c. 1539 – c. 1077 BCE) britannica.com
Authors of the article
Arkhipov S.V. – Independent Researcher, MD, PhD, Orthopedic Surgeon, Medical Writer, Joensuu, Finland.
Correspondence: Sergey Arkhipov, email: archipovsv @ gmail.com
Article history
March 21, 2026 - online version of the article published.
Suggested citation
Arkhipov S.V. The Book of Genesis as a Great Compilation of Texts and Meanings from the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt: A Pilot Culturological, Medical, Archaeological, and Textological Examination of the Legends versus Traditional Attribution. Chapter 44. About round ligament of femur. March 21, 2026.
Note
For more details, see the article:
Keywords
Genesis Protograph, Bereshit Protograph, Hyksos-era Scriptorium, Ligamentum Teres, Ligamentum Capitis Femoris, Minoan Eruption Impact, Bronze Age, Middle Egyptian Origin, Cross-cultural Codification, Ancient Medicine, Biblical Chronology
NB! Fair practice / use: copied for the purposes of criticism, review, comment, research and private study in accordance with Copyright Laws of the US: 17 U.S.C. §107; Copyright Law of the EU: Dir. 2001/29/EC, art.5/3a,d; Copyright Law of the RU: ГК РФ ст.1274/1.1-2,7