Skip to main content

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?

 

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis? A Medical Hypothesis

By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD & Lyudmila N. Arkhipova, BSN 





[i] Abstract

The Book of Genesis is an example of an ancient literary text that contains important medical insights. We propose that it was written in northern Egypt in the late 17th century BCE, approximately ten years after the Minoan eruption. The protograph likely emerged from the collaboration between an Asiatic seer, who rose to the rank of an Egyptian official, and an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist. By refining its dating and authorship, this hypothesis positions Genesis as a credible source of medical and historical data, thereby enhancing its value for interdisciplinary research.



[ii] Introduction

According to Rabbinic Judaism, the Book of Genesis*, emerged around the 13th century BCE, although critical scholarship suggests a possible composition in the 5th century BCE (Oliver 2017: 11–12.). Some scholars propose that the earliest fragments incorporated into the Pentateuch date to the 10th century BCE (Suggs, Sakenfeld & Mueller 1992: 5). A view indirectly supported by the earliest Hebrew inscriptions, which are dated to the late 11th or early 10th century BCE (Misgav, Garfinkel & Ganor 2009: 243). However, this does not exclude the possibility that the First Book of Moses was originally composed in a different language and at a different time.

* We have analyzed the English translation from Hebrew and quoted the Book of Genesis from: Leeser 1922.



[iii] Egyptian physician

The mythological narratives of the Book of Genesis are interwoven with passages that convey philosophical concepts and episodes related to real medical practice. The history of the development of medicine as a human endeavor is well documented, which helps to clarify the text’s origin and the possible identity of its author.

The description of an archaic surgical procedure on Adam's chest (Genesis 2:21) would intrigue any physician. It implies anaesthesia, a skin incision, rib resection, and wound closure. Thoracotomy is inconceivable without a set of instruments, suturing materials, artificial lung ventilation, and methods of pain relief. The earliest analogous narrative in entertaining prose is the Sumerian legend of the land of Dilmun, which primitively describes the healing of the rib of the god Enki by the goddess Nin-ti (Kramer 1961: 103). The first detailed medical discussion of ribs appears in the ancient Egyptian Edwin Smith Papyrus, which addresses their sprains, dislocations, fractures, and its palpation in the wound (Breasted 1930: 392, 398, 401, 402). The compiler of this trauma manual lived circa 1650–1550 BCE, no later than the 17th Dynasty (Sanchez & Burridge 2007: 1). He could only dream of chest surgery with rib resection under general anesthesia.

Evidence of treatment with cutting tools in the Mediterranean is found on the skull of an Egyptian who lived between 2686 and 2345 BCE (3rd–5th Dynasties, Old Kingdom) (Tondini, Isidro & Camarós 2024: 2). By 2400 BCE, surgical operations were regularly performed on the banks of the Nile (Gabriel 2012: 74). Texts from the New Kingdom period (1567–1085 BCE) indicate a decline in surgical practice (Rowling 1989: 316). The medical knowledge of the Sumerians was highly pragmatic, but during the later Babylonian period (1700–600 BCE) it became distorted by mysticism (Gabriel 2012: 55). This brief excursion into the early history of surgery confirms that the concept of thoracotomy could have been envisioned by a physician working within in the Old or Middle Kingdom of Egypt.

Abraham and his tribesmen undergo circumcision following their visit to Egypt (Genesis 13:1; 17:24–27). The Book of Genesis references this surgical procedure multiple times (Genesis 18:23–27; 21:4; 35:24). Notably, the author of this prose work not only demonstrates knowledge of foreskin circumcision but also appears to be aware of the timing and specifics of the postoperative period (Genesis 34:25). The earliest depiction of this procedure is found in a fresco from the reign of the 5th Dynasty king Djedkare, dated to 2388–2356 BCE (Megahed & Vymazalová 2011: 155; Bunson: 105).

The author of our primary source also pays attention to ophthalmology. Jacob’s wife, Leah, likely suffered from severe myopia (Genesis 29:17). Isaac’s “eyes were too dim to see,” effectively rendering him blind (Genesis 27:1, 18). Similarly, “the eyes of Israel were dim with age, and he could not see” (Genesis 48:10). The blindness of Isaac and Jacob was likely caused by trachoma, a chronic bacterial eye infection common in poor agricultural regions. The attribution of blindness to Jacob appears to be a literary device, as suggested by his final speech, which comforts and inspires his sons (Genesis 49:1). This speech resembles the blind Egyptian Harpers’ Songs, which were intended to console the tomb’s occupant (Lichtheim 2019: 242).

The First Book of Moses addresses clinical observations in the fields of gynaecology and obstetrics. The text describes the death of a parturient, presumably due to profuse postpartum haemorrhage (Genesis 35:18–19). For a time, women from three generations of one family suffered from infertility (Genesis 11:30; 25:21; 29:31). The narrative repeatedly emphasises that children are born through the involvement of men, who synthesise reproductive material (Genesis 30:17; 37:9). The author cleverly debunks the folk belief in the efficacy of mandrakes in overcoming difficulties with conception. Specifically, Rachel obtains the desired herb but remains unable to conceive for an extended period, while her sister, who provided the plant, gives birth to two sons and a daughter (Genesis 30:14, 17–21). Since ancient times, the mandrake has been known primarily for its sedative, hypnotic, and amnestic properties. Its depiction appears in several tombs in Luxor–Thebes (Upper Egypt), dating from the 16th to the 14th century BCE (Chidiac, Kaddoum & Fuleihan: 2012: 1437–1438).

In the Gynecological Papyrus Kahun, created during Egypt’s Middle Kingdom (ca. 1825 BCE)., reproductive pathologies and complications of childbirth are discussed, along with methods to improve conception and contraception, as well as the diagnosis of infertility and pregnancy (Haimov-Kochman, Sciaky-Tamir & Hurwitz 2005: 4). The First Book of Moses also speaks of a certain diagnosis of a multiple pregnancy (Genesis 25:23). The ancient Egyptian Westcar Papyrus, dating from the Hyksos period, tells of the birth of triplets attended by a team of divine midwives (Lichtheim 2019: 265, 270). Midwives are mentioned twice in the Book of Genesis (Genesis 35:17; 38:28). Multiple pregnancies are also mentioned twice (Genesis 25:24; 38:27). Both cases involve complications during childbirth, such as the expulsion of small foetal parts (Genesis 25:26; 38:28). In one instance, a midwife assisting the parturient repositions the child’s prolapsed arm (Genesis 38:28–29). In another case, without the assistance of a specialist, a child is born in an abnormal position with an outstretched arm (Genesis 25:26). This upper limb is inevitably pressed against the inner walls of the birth canal by the head, sometimes resulting in a fracture of the humerus. Such an injury almost certainly causes radial nerve paralysis (Watson-Jones 1952: 351). A fracture of the humerus with the arm hanging helplessly, possibly due to associated nerve damage, is described in the Edwin Smith Papyrus (Breasted 1930: 355).

The Book of Genesis describes a rare anomaly of hair growth in Esau (Genesis 25:25; 27:11, 23). This likely refers to congenital hypertrichosis lanuginosa or congenital generalised hypertrichosis (Wendelin, Pope & Mallory 2003: 164-165). The earliest written evidence of hypertrichosis appears in the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh, recorded between 2000 and 1800 BCE (Sommer 2004: 145). In particular, Enkidu is described as having “his whole body shaggy with hair.” (Kovacs 1989: 6). Esau appears to be a reincarnation of Enkidu, while the journeys of the demigod Gilgamesh resemble those of Jacob. Simultaneously, Jacob shares traits with the Egyptian fugitive-traveller Sinuhe (Parkinson 1997: 28). Earlier still, the Pyramid Texts of the 5th–6th Dynasties reflect the wanderings of Osiris, who was killed by his brother Set (Griffiths 1980: 7). In an older analogue, the slain Osiris travels in a coffin to Byblos and back, later as dismembered parts across the land, before being reassembled and departing to the underworld. The myth of Osiris recalls Cain's murder of his brother Abel (Genesis 4:8). It is well known that ancient authors freely compiled material from existing works (Lambert 1985: 115).

Beyond discussing somatic diseases, the author of the First Book of Moses addresses psychiatric issues. Abraham’s first spiritual communication occurs upon entering adulthood (Genesis 12:1–3). In advanced age, he continues to periodically perceive the voices of supernatural beings and converse with them (Genesis 15:1, 17; 17:1; 22:1, 11, 15). A rational explanation for the religious visions of the First Patriarch may be a brain lesion caused by a slowly progressing volumetric process. We propose that the occult phenomena in his prototype were triggered by a cyst resulting from a zoonotic disease prevalent among pastoralists: cysticercosis or echinococcosis. Isaac initially lacks religious visions, with only two recorded instances, one clearly a dream (Genesis 26:2, 24). Abraham and Isaac are depicted as nomads raising “small and large cattle” (Genesis 46:32; 47:3). The transmission of pathogens causing cystic echinococcosis involves canines, wild, and domesticated ungulates (Moro & Schantz 2009: 125-126). Cysticercosis is primarily contracted from pigs and large cattle (Zammarchi et al. 2013: 1). Systematic autopsies have identified echinococcosis in sheep, goats, cattle, and camels, and cysticercosis in goats, sheep, and cattle (Dada & Belino 1978: 311). It is documented that the localisation of parasitic formations in the brain can induce auditory and visual hallucinations in certain patients (Bekény & Péter 1973: 237; Asri et al. 2007: 216).

In light of the above, the genesis of the narrative about the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:24–25) becomes clear. If not the invention of a talented writer, it represents an embellished retelling of a hallucination provoked by daytime heat (Genesis 18:1). Beyond perceptual distortions, Abraham’s narrative includes judgements inconsistent with reality. Delusions of grandeur are implied in the divine promises of future power and dominion (Genesis 12:1–3; 15:18–21; 18:17–19). The account of Abimelech’s oppression resembles delusions of persecution (Genesis 20:2). Delusions of influence are suggested in the verses describing God’s command to sacrifice Isaac (Genesis 22:2). The mental disturbances of such a literary character, as in real life, evoke sympathy not only from physicians.

A different cause underlies the fantastical vision of Jacob at the city of Luz (Genesis 28:19). From a materialist perspective, this represents an episode of hypoxia during sleep, caused by a sharp tilt of the neck while the head rested on a large stone (Genesis 28:11–17). Acute and chronic oxygen deficiency in the blood affects the temporoparietal junction and prefrontal cortex, regions associated with mystical experiences and altered body perception (Arzy et al. 2005: 843). Insufficient cerebral oxygenation can induce confusion during sleep (Chokroverty 2007: 159).

For millennia, the struggle and communication of Jacob with either an angel or God at the Jabbok River (Genesis 32:25–30) has remained an enigma. This narrative bears a direct analogy to the dream of a patient, likely afflicted with typhoid fever, as depicted in the seventh tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh (Kovacs 1989: 64). A later Hittite ritual text portrays a similar confrontation between the goddess Khebat and a king. The Hittite and biblical accounts share striking similarities in content, but in the former, it is an isolated event integrated into a ritual, whereas in the latter, it forms part of a historical narrative (Tsevat 1983: 322).

Hallucinations, disorientation, and derealisation in mentally healthy individuals can be induced by sleep deprivation, nocturnal solitude, and mental or physical exhaustion (Mullaney et al. 1983: 645-646; Chaudhury 2010: 8-9). These conditions are present in the description of Jacob’s activities before and after crossing the stream (Genesis 32:23–24). His other dreams (Genesis 31:10; 45:2–3) are perceived as commonplace. In contrast, the divine appearances at Shechem and below Beth-el (Genesis 35:1, 8–9) stand out as likely later interpolations. References to Damascus (Genesis 14:15; 15:2), Rameses (Genesis 47:11), Midian (Genesis 37:28, 36), and the kings of Israel (Genesis 36:31) also appear to be editorial revisions of the protograph.

The narrative includes a description of an anthrax epidemic. During Sarah’s stay in the pharaoh’s quarters, a disease afflicts the courtiers, manifesting as “great plagues” (Genesis 12:17). Cutaneous anthrax arises from direct contact of a wound with animal products or through the bite of an insect vector (World Health Organization 2008: 2). The bacillus is carried by blood-sucking insects up to four kilometres away (Fasanella et al. 2013: 769). It appears that the author implies the presence of an infected animal in Abraham’s herd, located near the royal palace during his conversation with the ruler (Genesis 12:19). According to historical records, in 1733 BCE, the pharaoh Sihathor dies before ascending the throne for an unknown reason, followed by Neferhotep I in 1731 BCE. Earlier, in 1732 BCE, the throne passes to his brother Sobkhotep IV (Ryholt & Bülow-Jacobsen 1997: 408). It seems that, according to the author’s intent, Abraham arrives in Egypt in 1733 BCE, where an anthrax epidemic begins to rage. Among the first victims is Sihathor, followed later by Neferhotep I, who manages to appoint a successor. According to this scenario, the expulsion of Abraham’s family from Egypt should be dated to 1732–1731 BCE. Recognising a connection between the epidemic and the arrival of foreigners, they are prudently spared but expelled from the state along with their livestock (Genesis 12:20). To prevent infection of the native population and land, the foreigners are neither killed nor stripped of their possessions (Genesis 13:1–2). The prohibition on communal dining between the Egyptians and foreign shepherds is a reasonable precaution rather than an expression of disdain (Genesis 43:32; 46:34).

The text contains observations related to traumatology and pathological anatomy. Jacob returns from his journey as an Asiatic, akin to the ancient Egyptian Sinuhe (Parkinson 1997: 40). He crosses the Jabbok River, transporting his possessions, children, and livestock to the opposite bank (Genesis 32:23–24). The narrative then describes his struggle with a stranger at night and the dislocation of his hip (Genesis 32:25–26). Implicitly, the account suggests a twisting of the leg at the hip joint during a hasty crossing of the river. Following such an accident, the injured person may walk, but with a limp on “his thigh.” (Genesis 32:32). Like a medical manual, the author explains the morphological cause of the altered gait: damage to the “sinew” of the thigh (Genesis 32:33). The physician Moses ben Maimon, who lived in the 12th–13th centuries, held this opinion (Maimon c1986-c2007: 8.1.). In the 20th century, the Talmudist physician Julius Preuss confirmed this judgment (Preuss 2004: 132). Modern doctors also note changes in gait due to damage to the ligament of the head of femur (Byrd & Jones 2004: 387). Such an injury may subsequently lead to persistent lameness and debilitating osteoarthritis of the hip joint (Arkhipov & Skvortsov 2019: 157).

Dislocations of the jaw, vertebrae, and clavicle are discussed in the Edwin Smith Papyrus ( Breasted 1930: 303, 323, 342). It is possible that the second volume of this tract may have mentioned dislocation of the femur. The earliest information on the morphology of the human hip joint and its changes during injury is found in Homer's Iliad (Homer 1924: 217). The first mention of the ligament of the head of femur in humans appears in the treatise Mochlicus by Hippocrates of Cos (born 460 BCE) (Adams 1886: 162). The earliest reports of damage to this structure in hip dislocation are found in the works of the physician Heraclides of Tarentum and the surgeon Hegetor, both active in Alexandria in the third to second centuries BCE (Arkhipov & Prolygina 2020: 539-40).

How could the author of the Book of Genesis have known about the ligament of the head of femur before Greek physicians? The text reveals familiarity with thoracic surgery, andrology, obstetrics, gynaecology, ophthalmology, traumatology, psychiatry, epidemiology, pharmacognosy, teratology, medical genetics, and normal and pathological anatomy. The writer was knowledgeable in pharmacology and anaesthesiology, employed induced sleep, and understood the soporific effects of alcohol (Genesis 2:21; 9:21, 24). This intellectual was versed in selective breeding (Genesis 30:40–42), veterinary science (Genesis 24:35; 31:38–39; 32:6, 16; 49:6), and embalming (Genesis 50:2–3). This talented individual also contemplated the possibility of human cloning (Genesis 2:22). It seems that the idea of using a rib came from the observation of a whole plant growing from a leaf or branch. Our primary source reflects the author’s knowledge of history, geography, economics, biology, astronomy, cosmology, geophysics, meteorology, geology, technology, bromatology, agriculture, metallurgy, architecture, and military affairs.

This representative of a rare cohort of polymaths was comparable to Aristotle. In the Chester Beatty Papyrus IV (BM 10684), composed no earlier than the end of the 19th Dynasty, lists prominent ancient Egyptian intellectuals of past centuries: Hardedef, Imhotep, Nofri, Akhthoy, Ptahemdjedhuty, Khakheperrasenb, Ptahhotep, and Kairos (Gardiner 1935: 28, 39). However, the individual we seek possessed a profound medical education and knew Nineveh (Genesis 10:11), which ceased to be mentioned after 612 BCE (Dalley 1993: 134). Physicians from Jewish communities did not achieve prominence until the Middle Ages (Castiglioni 1947: 77). Babylonian medicine incorporated a significant amount of magic (Geller 2010: 8). As noted, “Like the Babylonians of later days, the Sumerians attributed numerous diseases to the unwelcome presence of harmful demons in the sick man’s body.” (Kramer 1981: 64).

We are convinced that the creation of the Book of Genesis involved a physician-encyclopaedist. He could only have appeared in Egypt before the New Kingdom, that is, approximately before 1550 BCE. This specialist was capable of producing a surgical treatise. There is only one document from that distant era distinguished by the exceptional expertise of the earliest known surgeon in history—the Edwin Smith Papyrus (Breasted 1930: 92). It was composed during the 16th–17th Dynasties, around 1600 BCE (Allen 2005: 70). It is reveals for the first time the personality of a physician probing the mysteries of the human body, identifying processes and conditions resulting from physical factors (Fisher & Shaw 2005: 43, 45–46). The treatise is written with coherent, dispassionate authority that commands respect for the intellect and stature of its scientific author (Rowling 1989: 313). The cases presented in the manuscript often stem from pathological-anatomical investigation, which was not uncommon for the composer (Breasted 1930: xvi).

The First Book of Moses implies the presence of such a specialist. We propose that Joseph entrusted this individual with leading a team of physicians and embalmers of Jacob’s body (Genesis 50:2). It is plausible that this physician concurrently conducted a post-mortem examination of the hip joint, identifying the cause of the deceased’s limp (Arkhipov & Skvortsov 2019: 157). Egyptian priests likely obstructed anatomical studies and surgical practices, which explains the limited understanding of human anatomy evident in medical texts (Gabriel 2012: 74). The influence of the native priesthood waned in the northern Nile Delta during the Second Intermediate Period. At that time, Asiatic settlers predominated there and continued to establish themselves in the region of Avaris until the end of Hyksos rule (Bietak 2018: 79).

In the Student’s Miscellany (BM 10684) from the Ramesside period, it is stated that the memory of book authors endures forever (Gardiner 1935: 37, 39). Narrative texts typically attract more attention than scientific ones. Presumably, the medical writer we seek intended to showcase their achievements to posterity and highlight unresolved scientific questions through such a work. The Edwin Smith Papyrus is more materialistic than the medical Ebers Papyrus, which contains more incantations, as its author seemingly likens themself to a god and attributes to themselves the ability to perform miracles (Ebers 1889: 240). The latter manuscript was composed between 1553 and 1550 BCE (Castiglioni 1947: 49). Accordingly, the pragmatic author of the Edwin Smith Papyrus, and, in our view, the Book of Genesis, wrote earlier.

Our primary source reveals a multitude of medical observations and elements of entertaining literature, but it is dominated by the legends of a single tribe. There is a sense that this collection of traditions is intended to elevate the status of Joseph. He is depicted as eloquent, cunning, literate, ambitious, with a vivid imagination and an excellent memory. Joseph is presented as the son of an Asiatic woman, born in Haran (Genesis 29:5–6; 30:22–23). His oratorical and prophetic talents manifest early (Genesis 37:5–11). As a youth, he is a shepherd who moves from the provinces to a metropolitan city (Genesis 37:2, 28, 36). Through successful prophecies, he advances his career and, according to the legend, rises to the position of prime minister (Genesis 40:8; 41:15, 40; 45:6). We propose that Joseph, or his prototype, was the primary author of the Book of Genesis, working in collaboration with a physician. Whether he actually attained a high position or merely aspired to one, legitimisation and popularisation were necessary for career advancement. In the past, those aspiring to administrative roles created a mythical framework around themselves, hoping it would appear so authentic as to render their authority widely accepted (Почекаев 2024: 6).

In the Nile Valley, individuals emerged who combined magic, medicine, and an interest in literature. Evidence of this is found in a tomb beneath the mortuary temple of Ramesses II, which contained a library known as the Ramesseum Papyri, dated to the 13th Dynasty (1755–1640 BCE). The last individual buried in this multi-chambered tomb likely belonged to a family of priests associated with writing, magic, ritual, and healing (Parkinson 2009: 189). The deceased also “took” copies of classic prose works and medico-magical manuscripts to the grave (Raven 2012: 77). Joseph forged a familial connection with the priesthood of Heliopolis (Genesis 41:45, 50; 46:20). This diviner could have been a writer, but he was assisted by a professional doctor, since our primary source contains an incredible amount of medical facts.

In the work under consideration, only Joseph’s life path is meticulously delineated. At the age of six, he migrates with his family to Canaan (Genesis 29:20, 30; 30:25–26; 31:17,41). At seventeen, he is “sold” into Egyptian slavery (Genesis 37:2, 28). In reality, lacking prospects for inheritance, he flees from a nomadic farm to an urbanised world. By the age of thirty, Joseph is appointed to rule “over all the land of Egypt” (Genesis 41:41, 46). As stated in the text, he lived to be one hundred and ten years old (Genesis 50:22, 26). Ancient Egyptian texts frequently reference an ideal lifespan of 110 years (Taylor 2001: 39).

The Ebers Papyrus, composed later than the Edwin Smith Papyrus, is notable for documenting a significant number of pathological conditions, possibly resulting from the aftermath of a volcanic eruption (Trevisanato 2006: 188). It is plausible to suggest that the author lived after a major volcanic eruption in the Mediterranean region. The most significant such cataclysm in the Bronze Age was the Minoan eruption of the Santorini volcano on Thera. Current analysis indicates that the Minoan eruption was the largest in the Holocene (Johnston et al. 2014: 583). Following such a catastrophe, phenomena comparable to the consequences of the 1815 Tambora eruption would have been observed: anomalous cooling, a “year without summer,” crop failures, malnutrition and human diseases, livestock mortality, and mass population migration (Oppenheimer 2003: 244).

Through the radiocarbon dating of an olive branch buried during the Minoan eruption, it has been established that the event undoubtedly occurred in the late 17th century BCE, with a 95% probability between 1627 and 1600 BCE (Friedrich et al. 2006: 548). A recent reassessment of fossil plant material from the Mediterranean has yielded similar results: the volcano was active between 1619 and 1543 BCE with a 95.4% probability, and between 1617 and 1601 BCE with a 62.8% probability (Manning et al. 2020: 9). Meanwhile, the largest sulphate signal in the Bronze Age, indicative of volcanic ash, found in a Greenland ice core, is dated to 1695 BCE (Clausen et al. 1997: 26713). It has been determined that, for dating chemical compounds in Greenland ice from this period, a correction of approximately 80 years is necessary, and carbon-dating data cannot be precisely calibrated (Southon 2004: 1255). Consequently, the anomalous concentration of sulphur compounds in Greenland likely precipitated around 1615 BCE. Based on preserved insect remains from that period, it has been inferred that the volcano “awakened” in the summer, likely in June or early July, after the harvest (Panagiotakopulu et al. 2013: 687). Ash and dust from the Santorini eruption were carried by winds to the south and east (Druitt, McCoy & Vougioukalakis 2019: 186, 189). Ash from the Minoan eruption has been found in the eastern Nile Delta (Stanley & Sheng 1986: 733).

The eruption of the Santorini volcano is presumably reflected in the Egyptian Stele of the Storm, which dates back to the beginning of the 18th Dynasty. On this obelisk, Pharaoh Ahmose describes an extraordinary climatic catastrophe, human casualties, and the destruction of buildings, while the intensification of storms and rainfall likely continued for several more years (Ritner & Moeller 2014: 14). The Hyksos, enemies of Ahmose, also noted this extraordinary weather phenomenon, which is mentioned in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus. Specifically, the document includes a note stating that, apparently, in early September, there was a thunder-like event with no rainfall, and rain only came the following day (Peet 1923: 129).

Our primary source describes a famine “in all lands” (Genesis 41:54). This implies that the food shortage was not linked to low Nile floods. It is further stated that, after two years, “the famine intensified in the land,” with a forecast of five more years “without ploughing or harvesting” (Genesis 43:1; 45:6). We propose that the authors intended to reference the consequences of the Santorini volcanism, which adversely affected agriculture in the Eastern Mediterranean. If this assumption is correct, the Book of Genesis was completed after the Minoan eruption. The prototype of Joseph did not predict this event but experienced it. This event serves as a reference point for dating the final portion of the work.

Less precisely verifiable temporal connections between the literary text and historical reality include the anthrax epidemic in Egypt around 1733 BCE and the destruction of Ur. Terah, Abraham, Sarah, and Lot abandon Ur (Genesis 11:31). It seems most plausible that, at that time, Abraham was 25 years old, and Sarah was ten years younger (Genesis 17:17). They were likely compelled to flee their homeland permanently due to King Samsu-iluna, who destroyed Ur and its walls, possibly in 1740 BCE (Brinkman 1969: 345). It is doubtful that Terah’s emigration was associated with the fall of the Third Dynasty of Ur in 2004 BCE (Samet 2014: 8).

Based on the aforementioned dates, we have attempted to reconstruct the chronology intended by the authors. In ancient Egypt, the harvest ripened between March and May (Noaman & Quosy 2017: 22). If the Santorini eruption occurred in 1615 BCE, then 1614 BCE marks the onset of the famine (Genesis 41:54). 

Estimated Timeline of Key Events in Abraham’s Family

Year before the modern era

 

Events

 

Links in the original source

 

1541

Hypothetical death of Joseph at age 110

Genesis 50:22,26.

1595

Hypothetical death of Jacob

Genesis 47:28; 49:33

1605

Presumed death of Jacob 7 years later

Explanation in the text

1612

Jacob arrives in Egypt

Genesis 45:6; 46:6

1614

Famine begins; Joseph is age 37

Genesis 41:53–54

1615

Minoan eruption

Explanation in the text

1621

Joseph is appointed to his position at age 30

Genesis 41:44,46

1634

Joseph arrives in Egypt at age 17

Genesis 37:2,28,36

1644

Family settles in Shechem

Genesis 33:18-19

1645

Family leaves Haran; Joseph is age 6; Jacob is injured at the Jabbok River

Genesis 31:17-18,41; 32:26,33

1651

Joseph is born; Jacob enters final contract with Laban

Genesis 30:22-23,25-34

1658

Jacob's wedding

Genesis 29:20,22

1665

Jacob flees to Haran at age 17?

Genesis 27:43; 28:10; 29:1–4

1682

Birth of Esau and Jacob

Genesis 25:25–26

1707–1706

Birth of Isaac

Genesis 21:2

1708–1707

Circumcision of Abraham and Ishmael at age 13

Genesis 17:24–25

1721–1720

Birth of Ishmael

Genesis 16:15

1722–1721

Conception of Ishmael

Genesis 16:2–4

1732–1731

Abraham's family leaves Egypt

Genesis 13:1

1733–1732

Anthrax epidemic in Egypt

Genesis 12:17

1733–1732

Abraham and Sarah arrive in Egypt

Genesis 12:14

1740

Abraham (age 25?) and Sarah (age 15?) leave Ur

Genesis 11:31; 17:17

1755

Presumed birth of Sarah

Explanation in the text

1765

Birth of Abraham

Genesis 11:26

Presumably, in 1612 BCE, at the age of seventy, Jacob arrived in Egypt (Genesis 45:6; 46:6). Evidence of an increasing Asiatic population in the Avaris region is noted during the 13th Dynasty (circa 1773–1650 BCE) (Bard 2015: 188). However, a higher density of settlement in this area is observed later, specifically at the end of the Second Intermediate Period (Vilain 2021: 320). Archaeological finds at the ruins of Avaris (Tell el-Dab‘a) reveal artefacts indicating a fusion of Egyptian and Canaanite cultures, with the latter predominating (Redmount 1995: 182).

The text repeatedly, in various forms, conveys that the agricultural depression lasted seven years (Genesis 41:27, 30, 36, 54; 45:6, 11). Based on this, the authors suggest that Jacob lived in a foreign land for seven years. Thus, he likely died at approximately seventy-seven years of age. Consequently, soon after 1605 BCE, the narrative of the epic and, presumably, the work on it were completed. Joseph’s death and the mention of his age are presented as a forecast. Therefore, as a testament, we interpret the final verses regarding the embalming of his body and burial in Egypt (Genesis 50:26). This, we believe, represents the chronicle of the three Patriarchs as constructed by the authors. The destinies of four generations of this family reasonably fit within a span of approximately 150 years.



[v] Conclusion

Having analysed the Book of Genesis with consideration of its medical insights, we conclude that its initial version was completed in the northern Nile Delta in the late 17th century BCE, approximately a decade after the Minoan eruption. This literary work was originally inscribed in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs or Proto-Sinaitic symbols. Its authors were an Asiatic seer who became an official under a Hyksos pharaoh and an Egyptian physician-intellectual. Subsequent editors modified the text to align with religious and political agendas. The male co-authors of the protograph, creating in the Bronze Age, shaped the patriarchal nature of the narrative. These poetic creators placed their characters within clearly defined temporal and geographical frameworks. Additionally, to convince readers of the story’s authenticity, they incorporated descriptions of real natural phenomena and the culture of the Fertile Crescent’s inhabitants. The narrative integrates fragments of canonical literary monuments and implies familiar characters, adding to the credibility. Thus, the account approaches the format of a universal encyclopaedia. It was created with specific purposes in mind. The seer-official, Joseph, crafted a legend about his people’s arrival in Egypt, glorified his ancestors, and legitimised himself as a holder of authority. The physician-polymath demonstrated the breadth of his knowledge and depth of understanding of medico-social issues. We propose naming him Imhotep the Younger. Attributing a name to this talented physician facilitates crediting him with the earliest documentation of significant medical facts recorded in Genesis. One such fact is the earliest mention of the ligament of the head of femur and its injury as a cause of severe hip joint disease.Параграф в разработке. 



[vi] References

Adams, Francis, ed. The genuine works of Hippocrates – Volume 2. New York: William Wood, 1886.

Allen, James P. The art of medicine in ancient Egypt. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005.

Arkhipov, Sergey V., and Dmitry V. Skvortsov. “Ligamentum capitis femoris: first written mentions.” MLTJ 9.2 (2019): 156-64.

Arkhipov, Sergey V., and Irina V. Prolygina. “Ancient Textual Sources on Ligamentum Teres: Context and Transmission.” MLTJ 10.3 (2020): 536-46.

Asri, Fatiha, I. Tazi, K. Maaroufi, A. El Moudden, H. Ghannane, S. Ait Benali. “Kyste hydatique cérébral et troubles psychiatriques. À propos de deux cas [Cerebral hydatic cyst and psychiatric disorders. Two cases].” L'encephale 3.2 (2007): 216-9.

Bard, Kathryn A. An introduction to the archaeology of ancient Egypt. Malden, MA; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.

Bekény, Georg, and & Ágnes Péter. “Meningocerebral cysticercosis with auditory perseveration (palinacusis).” Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 35.4 (1973): 236-47.

Ben Maimon, Moses. Mishneh Torah, Forbidden Foods. Translated by Eliyahu Touger. Jerusalem: Moznaim Publishing, c1986-c2007. www.sefaria.org. Accessed October 24, 2025.

Bietak, Manfred. “The many ethnicities in Avaris.” Pages 73-92 in From microcosm to macrocosm: individual households and cities in ancient Egypt and Nubia. Edited by Julia Budka and Johannes Auenmüller. Leiden: Sidestone press, 2018.

Breasted, James Henry. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: published in facsimile and hieroglyphic transliteration with translation and commentary in two volumes – Volume 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930.

Brinkman, John Anthony. “Ur: ‘The Kassite Period and the Period of the Assyrian Kings.’” Orientalia, NOVA SERIES. 38.2 (1969): 310-348.

Bunson, Margaret. Encyclopedia of ancient Egypt. New York: Facts on File, 2002.

Byrd, John W. Thomas and Kay S. Jones. “Traumatic rupture of the ligamentum teres as a source of hip pain.” Arthroscopy 20.4 (2004): 385-391. 

Castiglioni, Arturo. A history of medicine. New York: Knopf, 1947.

Chaudhury, Suprakash. “Hallucinations: Clinical aspects and management.” Ind Psychiatry J 19.1 (2010): 5-12.

Chidiac, Elie J., Romeo N. Kaddoum, and Samir F. Fuleihan. “Mandragora: anesthetic of the ancients.” Anesth Analg 115.6 (2012): 1437-1441.

Chokroverty, Sudhansu. 100 questions & answers about sleep and sleep disorders. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 2007.

Clausen, Henrik B., Claus U. Hammer, Christine S. Hvidberg, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Jørgen P. Steffensen, Josef Kipfstuhl, Michel Legrand. “A comparison of the volcanic records over the past 4000 years from the Greenland Ice Core Project and Dye 3 Greenland ice cores.” J Geophys Res Oceans 102.C12 (1997): 26707-26723.

Dada, B. J., and E. D. Belino. “Prevalence of hydatidosis and cysticercosis in slaughtered livestock in Nigeria.” Vet Rec 103.14 (1978): 311-2.

Dalley, Stephanie. “Nineveh after 612 BC.” Altorientalische Forschungen 20.1 (1993): 134-47.

Druitt, Timothy H., Floyd W. McCoy, Georges E. Vougioukalakis. “The Late Bronze Age eruption of Santorini volcano and its impact on the ancient Mediterranean world.” Elements 15.3 (2019): 185-190.

Ebers, Georg. Papyrus Ebers: Die Maasse und das Kapitel über die Augenkrankheiten. Abhandlungen der Philologisch–Historischen Klasse der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. Band 11, No 2–3. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1889.

Fasanella, Antonio, Giuliano Garofolo, Michelangelo Galella, Pasquale Troiano, Carlo De Stefano, … & Rosanna Adone. “Suspect vector transmission of human cutaneous anthrax during an animal outbreak in Southern Italy.” VBZD 13.10 (2013): 769-771. 

Fisher, Ricardo F. González and Patricia L. Flores Shaw. “El papiro quirúrgico de Edwin Smith.” Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC 50.1 (2005): 43-48.

Gabriel, Richard A. Man and wound in the ancient world: A history of military medicine from Sumer to the fall of Constantinople. Washington: Potomac Books, 2012.

Gardiner, Alan H. Hieratic Papyri in the British Museum, Third Series: Chester Beatty Gift – Volume 1. London: British Museum, 1935.

Geller, Markham J. Ancient Babylonian medicine: theory and practice. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2010.

Griffiths, John G. The origins of Osiris and his cult. Leiden: Brill, 1980.

Haimov-Kochman, Ronit, Yael Sciaky-Tamir, and Arye Hurwitz. Reproduction concepts and practices in ancient Egypt mirrored by modern medicine. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123.1 (2005): 3-8.

Homer. The Iliad. – Volume 1. Translated by A. T. Murray in two volumes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; London: Heinemann, 1924.

Johnston, Emma N., R. Stephen J. Sparks, Jeremy C. Phillips, Steven Carey. “Revised estimates for the volume of the Late Bronze Age Minoan eruption, Santorini, Greece.” J Geol Soc 171.4 (2014): 583-590.

Kovacs, Maureen G. The epic of Gilgamesh. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.

Kramer, Samuel Noah. “Mythology of Sumer and Akkad.” Pages 93–137 in Mythologies of the ancient world. Edited by Samuel N. Kramer. New York, Garden City: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, 1961.

Kramer, Samuel Noah. History begins at Sumer: Thirty-nine firsts in recorded history. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania press, 1981.

Lambert, Wilfred G. “The Evolution of the Gilgamesh Epic.” JBL 104.1 (1985): 115-17.

Leeser, Isaac. Twenty-four Books of the Holy Scriptures. New York: Bloch, 1922.

Lichtheim, Miriam, ed. Ancient Egyptian Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2019.

Manning, Sturt W., Lukas Wacker, Ulf Büntgen, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Michael W. Dee, Bernd Kromer, Brita Lorentzen, Willy Tegel. “Radiocarbon offsets and old world chronology as relevant to Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia and Thera (Santorini).” Sci Rep 10.1 (2020): 13785.

Megahed, Mohamed, and Hana Vymazalová. “Ancient Egyptian royal circumcision from the pyramid complex of Djedkare.” Anthropologie (1962-) 49.2 (2011): 155-64.

Misgav, Haggai, Yosef Garfinkel, Saar Ganor. “The ostracon.” Pages 243–57 in Khirbet Qeiyafa. Vol. 1. Excavation Report 2007–2008. Edited by Yosef Garfinkel and Saar Ganor. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 2009.

Moro, Pedro, and Peter M. Schantz. “Echinococcosis: a review.” IJID 13.2 (2009): 125-33.

Mullaney, Daniel J., Daniel F. Kripke, Paul A. Fleck, Laverne C. Johnson. “Sleep loss and nap effects on sustained continuous performance.” J Psychophysiol 20.6 (1983): 643-651.

Noaman, Mohanad N., and D. El Quosy. “Hydrology of the Nile and ancient agriculture.” Pages 9-28 in Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt: Past, Present and Future. Edited by Masayoshi Satoh and Samir Aboulroos. Cham: Springer, 2017.

Oliver, Simon. Creation: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury, 2017.

Oppenheimer, Clive. “Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815.” Prog Phys Geogr 27.2 (2003): 230-259.

Panagiotakopulu, Eva, Thomas Higham, Anaya Sarpaki, Paul Buckland, Christos Doumas. “Ancient pests: the season of the Santorini Minoan volcanic eruption and a date from insect chitin.” Naturwissenschaften 100.7 (2013): 683-689.

Parkinson, Richard B. Reading ancient Egyptian poetry: among other histories. Malden, MA; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

Parkinson, Richard B. The tale of Sinuhe and other ancient Egyptian poems, 1940-1640 BC. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.

Peet, Eric T., еd. The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus: British Museum 10057 and 10058. London: University Press of Liverpool, 1923.

Preuss, Julius. Biblical and Talmudic Medicine. Translated by Fred Rosner. Landah, MD: A Jason Aronson Book, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.

Raven, Maarten J. Egyptian magic: the quest for Thoth's Book of Secrets. Cairo, New York: American University in Cairo, 2012.

Redmount, Carol A. “Ethnicity, pottery, and the Hyksos at Tell el-Maskhuta in the Egyptian Delta.” The Biblical Archaeologist 58.4 (1995): 182-190.

Ritner, Robert K., and Nadine Moeller. The Ahmose ‘Tempest Stela’, Thera and comparative chronology. JNE 73.1 (2014): 1-19.

Rowling, Thompson J. “The rise and decline of surgery in dynastic Egypt.” Antiquity 63.239 (1989): 312-9.

Ryholt, Kim S. B., and Adam Bülow-Jacobsen. The political situation in Egypt during the second intermediate Period, c. 1800-1550 BC – Volume 20. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 1997.

Samet, Nili. The Lamentation over the Destruction of Ur. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2014.

Sanchez, Gonzalo M., and Alwyn L. Burridge. “Decision making in head injury management in the Edwin Smith Papyrus.” Neurosurgical focus 23.1 (2007): E5.

Shahar, Arzy, Moshe Idel, Theodor Landis, Olaf Blanke. “Why revelations have occurred on mountains?: Linking mystical experiences and cognitive neuroscience.” Medical hypotheses 65.5 (2005): 841-845.

Sommer, Benjamin D. “The Epic of Gilgamesh.” Pages 145–55 in World literature and its times. Vol. 6. Middle Eastern Literature and Its Times. Edited by Joyce Moss. Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2004.

Southon, John. “A radiocarbon perspective on Greenland ice-core chronologies: can we use ice cores for 14C calibration?.” Radiocarbon 46.3 (2004): 1239-1259.  

Stanley, Daniel Jean and Harrison Sheng. “Volcanic shards from Santorini (upper Minoan ash) in the Nile Delta, Egypt.” Nature 320.6064 (1986): 733-735.

Suggs, M. Jack, Katharine Doob Sakenfeld and James R. Mueller, eds. The Oxford Study Bible: Revised English Bible with Apocrypha. Oxford, London, New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Taylor, John H. Death and the afterlife in ancient Egypt. London: The British Museum Press, 2001.

Tondini, Tatiana, Albert Isidro, and Edgard Camarós. “Case report: Boundaries of oncological and traumatological medical care in ancient Egypt: new palaeopathological insights from two human skulls.” Frontiers in Medicine 11 (2024): 1371645.

Trevisanato, Siro Igino. “Six medical papyri describe the effects of Santorini’s volcanic ash, and provide Egyptian parallels to the so-called biblical plagues.” Med. Hypotheses 67.1 (2006): 187-190.

Tsevat, Matitiahu. “Two Old Testament Stories and Their Hittite Analogues.” JAOS 103.1 (1983): 321-326.

Vilain, Sarah. “A Crisis? What Crisis? Challenging Times at Tell el-Dab'a during the Second Intermediate Period.” Pages 315-32 in The Enigma of the Hyksos. Vol. 4. Changing Clusters and Migration in the Near Eastern Bronze Age. Collected Papers of a Workshop held in Vienna 4th−6th of December 2019. Edited by Manfred Bietak and Silvia Prell. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2021.

Walter L. Friedrich, Bernd Kromer, Michael Friedrich, Jan Heinemeier, Tom Pfeiffer, Sahra Talamo. “Santorini eruption radiocarbon dated to 1627-1600 BC.” Science 312.5773 (2006): 548.

Watson-Jones, Reginald. Fractures and joint injuries – Volume 1, 4th ed.  Edinburgh, London: E. & s. Livingstone, 1952.

Wendelin, Daniel S., David N. Pope, and Susan B. Mallory. “Hypertrichosis.” J Am Acad Dermatol 48.2 (2003): 161-82.

World Health Organization and International Office of Epizootics. Anthrax in humans and animals. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.

Zammarchi, Lorenzo, Marianne Strohmeyer, Filippo Bartalesi, Elisa Bruno, José Muñoz,Dora Buonfrate, Alessandra Nicoletti, … & The COHEMI Project Study Group. “Epidemiology and management of cysticercosis and Taenia solium taeniasis in Europe, systematic review 1990–2011.” PloS one 8.7 (2013): e69537.

Почекаев, Роман. Легитимация власти, узурпаторство и самозванство в государствах Евразии. Тюрко-монгольский мир XIII–начала ХХ в. [Legitimization of Power, Usurpation, and Imposture in the Eurasian States. The Turco-Mongol World of the 13th–Early 20th Cen.] Москва: Издательский Дом ВШЭ, 2024. 



[vii] Application

Authors of the article

Arkhipov S.V. – Independent Researcher, MD, PhD, Orthopedic Surgeon, Medical Writer, Joensuu, Finland.

Arkhipova L.N. – Bachelor of Nursing, Joensuu, Finland.

Correspondence: Sergey Arkhipov, email: archipovsv @ gmail.com

 

Article history

November 11, 2025 - online version of the article published. 

 

Suggested citation

Arkhipov S.V, Arkhipova L.N. Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis? A Medical Hypothesis. About round ligament of femur. November 11, 2025. https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2025/11/who-when-and-where-wrote-book-of-genesis.html

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21265.29289; 

PDF version: researchgate.net , academia.edu , drive.google.com

Discussion: medium.com

 


Note


Keywords

Ligamentum capitis femoris, Ligamentum teres, Ligament of head of femur, Genesis, Ancient texts, Minoan eruption, Ancient Egypt, Interdisciplinary research, Medical hypothesis, Proto-Genesis, Authorship



NB! Fair practice / use: copied for the purposes of criticism, review, comment, research and private study in accordance with Copyright Laws of the US: 17 U.S.C. §107; Copyright Law of the EU: Dir. 2001/29/EC, art.5/3a,d; Copyright Law of the RU: ГК РФ ст.1274/1.1-2,7

MYTHS AND MISCONCEPTIONS

                                                                   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

11th-15th Century

   11th-15th Century Catalog of archived publications of the specified period        11th century 976-1115Theophilus Protospatharius  The author writes about the  normal anatomy of the LCF and its connective function. 1012-1024Avicenna   The author writes about the localization and  variant of the pathology LCF, leading to hip dislocation. 1039-1065Giorgi Mtatsmindeli   The translator mentions the LCF damage, and notes its presence in animals. 12 th century 1120-1140Judah Halevi   The author mentions LCF (גיד) of mammals. 1176-1178(a)Rambam  The author mentions the pathology of LCF (גיד) in humans and points out the presence of this structure in animals. 1176-1178(b)Rambam  The author writes about the localization of LCF (גיד) ) and distinguishes it from a tendon,   blood vessel or nerve. 1185-1235David Kimchi  The author writes about the localization, purpose, and injury of the LCF (גיד), and also talks abo...

Catalog. Classifications of LCF Pathology

  The classifications are intended to systematize of ligamentum capitis femoris pathology and assist in the development of general approaches to its description, registration, analysis and treatment.   Keywords ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, hip joint, histology, pathological anatomy, pathology, trauma INTRODUCTION In Russia, the initial attempts to classify pathology of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) were made by morphologists. The development of arthroscopic surgery has made it possible to identify various, previously undescribed types of LCF pathology, which prompted the development of various modern classifications based on intraoperative observations. Analysis of literature data and our own morphological observations allowed us to propose a General Classification of the Ligamentum Teres Pathology, which has the form of a collection of classifiers, as well as a Classification of Functions of the Ligamentum Teres. The ...

The First Scientific Mention

  European science has known the LCF for about 2500 years. It is the most important functional connection of the hip joint. The first person to describe the LCF was Hippocrates (c. 460-370 BCE). A written mention of the LCF is found in §1 of his treatise "On the Instrument of redactions". In our opinion, a book created in the library of the Asclepeion of the island of Kos. Hippocrates did not dissection of the human body, did not operate on the hip joint, did not have a CT scan and MRI. How he could discover the LCF? In our view, it is possible that Hippocrates treated a patient with an open hip dislocation. Track Music:  Blue Dot Sessions ,  Vittoro  (CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED / fragment) keywords: ligamentum capitis femoris, ligament of head of femur, ligamentum teres, hip dislocation .                                                     ...

University_of_Guelph(website)

  Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   Illustrations [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation A quote from an article on the University of Guelph website. The publication mentions the animal's ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) and states its function: fixing the femoral head in the acetabulum. The text in Russian is available at the following link: University_of_Guelph(website) . [ii]   Original text Quote 1.  Hindlimb skeleton. Femur [animals]   The articular head of the femur is deeply rounded and it bears a round ligament that holds it into the acetabulum.   [iii]   Illustrations – [iv]   Source  &  links STRUCTURE OF THE SKELETON.  2023.   animalbiosciences.uoguelph.ca [v]   Notes The work  is cited in the following publications:  [vi]   Authors & Affiliations Unive...

BIOMECHANICS OF THE HIP JOINT WITHOUT LCF

  Biomechanics of the hip joint without LCF Do you remember the comparison of the ligamentum teres with the spring element of a cart? ( 1874SavoryWS ). An analogy could arise after reading the book Bell J. The Principles of Surgery (1801) . Most orthopedists still think so. For more details see: https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/04/1836-1840partridger.html   &  1836-1840PartridgeR   (remembering the history of orthopedics) #ligamentum_teres   #ligamentum_capitis_femoris   #hip   #biomechanics    Publication in the facebook group 03/28/2025.                                                                                                                   ...

The First Open Reconstruction

  The first open reconstruction of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) was performed in 1926 by Ernest William Hey Groves (1872-1944) (1927Hey-GrovesEW). The surgery was proposed for the treatment of congenital hip dislocation in children. Later, in 1928, regarding this pathology, he noted: «Congential dislocation of the hip is a deformity which is mysterious in its origin, insidious in its course and relentless in its final crippling results» (quoted from 1983RatliffAH). In the early 20th century, a pioneer in orthopedic surgery realized that the LCF played a crucial role in the development of this pathology and developed a technique for its reconstruction. Illustration: Open reconstruction of the LCF in congenital hip dislocation. Copies of drawings from 1927Hey-GrovesEW with our additions;  arrows indicate the reconstructed LCF. .                                         ...

1747PlatnerJZ

  Fragments of the book by J.Z. Platner « Institutiones Chirurgiae rationalis ...» (1747) with mention of ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). The author describes the LCF as a durable structure that can be damaged by traumatic hip dislocations and also become pathologically altered: weakened, elongated, and disappear. The text is prepared for machine translation using a service built into the blog from Google or your web browser. In some cases, we have added links to quotations about LCF available on our resource, as well as to publications posted on the Internet.   Quote p p . 432-433 §. 1192. Femur parte sua suprema habet magnum teretemque processum, qui oblique ad os coxæ procedit, quem cervicem appellant. Hæc cervix, intus rara & cavernosa, desinit in magnum & rotundissimum caput, cartilagine etiam mollitum, quod in sinum rotundum coxæ conjicitur. Sinus Anatomicis κοτύλη , vel acetabulum, vocatur, qui in junioribus ex tribus ossibus, quæ media cartilagine inter se co...

The Big Bang

  The Big Bang The maximum age of the observable Universe, established by measuring the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background, is 13.801±0.024 billion years. (2020AghanimN_RoudierG). The relic stages of the creation of the World are only approxim ately understood by theoretical physicists. The development of matter into molecules, as well as the start of time, is logically described by the Big Bang theory and the concept of the expansion of space (2012HawkingS). It is impossible to imagine the Universe before its expansion from some homogeneous space or an infinitesimal grain. The reason for this is the «inner cosmic oblivion» of the previous state (2007BojowaldM). In our opinion, before that there was a black, cold, motionless Peace. Accordingly, before the mark of 13.8 billion years ago, the search for evidence of ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) is futile anywhere in the Universe. One second after the Big Bang, the Universe consisted of light and elementary particles hea...

280-352Rava

  Sayings of Rava extracted from the tractates Chullin and  Horayot  (Babylonian Talmud). Babylonian Talmud was written between about 450 - 550 in present-day Iraq (formerly Babylonia). The rabbi identifies the location and distal attachment site of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) and demonstrates knowledge of its function.  See our commentary at the link:   280-352Rava [Rus]. Quote 1. [Heb] Chullin 54b3 (original source:  sefaria.org ) Quote 2. [Heb] Chullin 91a12 (original source:  sefaria.org ) Quote 3. [Heb] Horayot 12a:16 (original source:  sefaria.org ) Translation Quote 1. [Eng] Chullin 54b3 The Gemara addresses the matter itself: Rav Mattana says: This head of the femur that was completely dislocated renders the animal a tereifa. And Rava said: The animal is kosher, but if its sinew holding the bone in place is cut, it is a tereifa. The Gemara concludes: And the halakha is: Even if the sinew is cut, the animal is still kosher...

1832MeckelJF

  Fragments of the book Meckel JF. Manual of general, descriptive, and pathological anatomy (1832) dedicated to ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). The author briefly discusses abnormalities of the LCF and its distal insertion. Quote p. 257 § 308. Among the deviations from the normal state, primitive deviations of the external form are rare, and usually attend anomalies of the other tissues. Among these we arrange, for instance, the absence of the tendons of the abdominal muscles, that of the ligaments of the vertebral column, and that of the dura mater of the brain and spinal marrow, &c., in a congenital fissure of the abdomen, of the vertebral column, and of the skull, and that of the tendons and the muscles of a finger, when the finger itself is wanting. But the fibrous organs are seldom deficient, when the other tissues with which they combine to form a part are present — for instance, the tendon alone of a muscle is rarely absent, or the tunica sclerotica, when the othe...