Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 11

 

Short retelling of chapter 11 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 


Chapter 11. ARARAT AND AKKAD

According to Genesis, Noah’s ark comes to rest "in the mountains of Ararat." It is possible that Noah settles there after his miraculous survival. Initially, he lives in a tent, cultivates fields, grows grapes, and makes wine. The text states that from Noah’s sons, "the whole earth was repopulated." They disembark with "every animal, every creeping thing, every bird, everything that moves on the earth," giving rise to today’s diversity of terrestrial vertebrates—mammals, reptiles, and birds at minimum. However, no mention is made of other non-aquatic creatures like worms, mollusks, or arthropods, most of which likely perished in the floodwaters.

At some point, Noah’s descendants migrate, though the origin and trigger for this movement are unclear. The reason is briefly stated: "and it came to pass," after which the people travel from east to west, settling in a "plain in the land of Shinar." There, they seek to "make a name for themselves," mining "mountain resin," firing bricks, and building a "city and a high tower." The settlement is named "Babel," becoming a hub from which later generations spread "across the face of the whole earth." Details of their further movements remain unknown, with the narrative only noting this occurs after the flood’s aftermath is resolved.

Noah’s grandchildren and great-grandchildren found numerous peoples, establishing cities like Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen, and kingdoms such as Babel, Erech, Akkad, Calneh, and Shinar. Initially, they form a single ethnic group, as "the whole earth had one language." Some scholars see in the names of Noah’s great-grandsons the founders of ancient North African and Near Eastern states.

These fragments of Genesis outline a relatively documented slice of human history. The text suggests Noah’s clan founded a civilization, but which one and their ancestral homeland remain obscure. Could viticulture and winemaking have begun near the ark’s landing?

The ark’s design lacks propulsion—sails, screws, wheels, poles, or oars. During the flood, it floats and drifts with the waves. The narrative implies it moves "above" then "among" mountains, suggesting it follows water currents. No wind is mentioned early in the disaster; it blows only after 150 days. Until then, water flow drives the vessel. Given its size, the ark has significant inertia, limiting speed, likely staying near its starting point throughout the calamity.

The story’s language indicates the voyage ends "in the mountains," called "Ararat." Their precise location is unknown, but the ark’s slow drift suggests proximity to the "land of Nod." The "Ararat mountains" appear in the "P source" (715–687 BCE), not in the earlier "J source" (828–722 BCE).

Maps show two extinct volcanoes: Greater Ararat (5,165 meters, 39°42'07"N, 44°17'54"E) and Lesser Ararat (3,925 meters, 39°38'56"N, 44°24'44"E), on the Armenian Plateau northwest of Mesopotamia, the Zagros, and the Iranian Plateau. Local peoples historically used different names for these peaks. We favor the idea that "Ararat mountains" refer to Aratta, a mythical Sumerian land "beyond seven mountains," possibly in modern Kerman province, south of the Iranian Plateau, rather than near the Caspian Sea. The P source’s religious author might have envisioned a fantastical or distant mountainous region, its true location lost to time, with no robust evidence supporting current theories.

Genesis places the flood’s events in mountains, where they conclude. We argue the disaster was local, in Kermanshah’s valleys and adjacent lowlands. As waters recede, Noah’s family leaves their refuge—a highland cave. Per P, this takes about a year; per J, two months.

Considering the catastrophe’s scale and duration, its aftermath was severe. People and livestock outside caves perished. Fruit trees and shrubs were uprooted, topsoil washed away. Temporary and permanent structures collapsed, wells caved in. Tools, provisions, and seeds spoiled or were swept away by the Seymare and Sirwan rivers. Riverbeds shifted, swamps expanded, and new lakes formed. Slopes eroded, and lowland pastures were littered with stones, mud, and debris. Grasslands wouldn’t recover until the next season, hindering grazing and farming.

For years, Noah struggled with land use and hunting for food. Assessing resources, his family could stay or move to less devastated areas. We believe they remained in the "land of Nod." A milder post-flood climate offered recovery prospects. Genesis implies no rivalry with other tribes, and Noah’s family faced neither famine nor disease, surviving and thriving.

The narrative’s end introduces grapes, signaling warming. Vines rest below 10°C, bloom at 17–20°C, and thrive at 28–30°C. Wild grapes grow in the Fertile Crescent, reaching the Eastern Taurus and northern Zagros, including modern Kermanshah, where early and mid-season varieties flourish. Pre-flood, Nod’s average temperatures likely fell below 28–30°C, limiting warm crops, but post-flood conditions allowed viticulture.

Genetic evidence supports this: Vitis vinifera emerged 11,000–9,000 years ago (9000–7000 BCE), spreading after warming 11,270 ± 30 years ago. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, used for bread, beer, and wine, appeared 11,900 years ago. By 9000 BCE, humans fermented grape juice unknowingly. Winemaking began by 7000 BCE in the Caucasus, Eastern Taurus, and northern Zagros. Chinese fermented fruit drinks date to 7000 BCE, Georgian grape seeds to 8000–7000 BCE, and wine acid salt from Hajji Firuz Tepe (northern Zagros) to 5400–5000 BCE.

Viticulture and fermentation align with warming 11,270 years ago, supporting the "Noah hypothesis," named for the biblical vintner. Post-glacial warming fostered interregional exchange, possibly bringing grape seeds to Noah’s kin from the Caucasus or Anatolia.

Noah’s wine-drinking episode suggests an anonymous encyclopedist with medical knowledge, aware of alcohol’s effects. This figure may have used wine for sedation or pain relief in surgeries, embedding a moral lesson in Noah’s story to highlight its therapeutic value for stress, insomnia, or pain. Noah, likely traumatized, used wine and work to cope, not to indulge.

Genesis notes post-flood humanity shared "one language and one speech," with Noah’s genealogy tracing tribal history. A vague event sparks migration: "as they journeyed from the east, they found a plain in Shinar and settled there." The origin and cause are unspecified, only the westward direction clear. Shinar is likely Babylonia, the plain Mesopotamia, with Shinar as Akkad’s northern realm, distinct from southern Sumer or Chaldea. East lies the Iranian Plateau and Zagros. Genesis mentions no prior migration stages, suggesting a single, short move.

We propose Noah’s tribe lived in Kermanshah’s valley, where climate and resources spurred growth in arts and crafts. A grave issue forced their departure, a desperate solution to a communal crisis.

The tribe likely followed a path later called the Great Khorasan Road, linking Babylon to Hamadan, used by Darius and Alexander. It crosses Kermanshah south of Do-Ashkaft cave, Noah’s possible refuge. Cain may have taken this route to Nod. Today, it’s Iran’s Route 48, connecting Kermanshah to Qasreshirin and Khanaqin. Artifacts date its use to ~3500 BCE.

Noah’s family likely knew this "Cain’s path," trading with Mesopotamia. It’s 300 km to northern Mesopotamia, feasible for moving goods, livestock, and children. They settle in Shinar—Babylonia—where Genesis lists Babel, Erech, Akkad, and Calneh. Sargon the Great (2334–2279 BCE) later founds Akkad’s dynasty, possibly linked to Genesis’s Nimrod.

Paleoclimate data suggest a prolonged drought, tied to cooling 8,175 ± 30 years ago (6225 ± 30 BCE), drove migration. Greenland’s temperature dropped 3.3 ± 1.1°C in under 20 years, recovering over 70 years, with the shift lasting ~150 years. Cooling and aridity hit Europe, North Africa, East Asia, and Syria’s Tell Sabi Abyad, where farmers adapted. Northern Hemisphere dryness, tied to Atlantic freshening, pushed Kermanshah’s people to the Tigris and Euphrates. Early Mesopotamian cultures bloomed 7000–6000 BCE.

Migrants built a city with fired clay bricks, implying prior knowledge of the technique. Ancient permanent homes, dated 10,000–7590 BCE, are found at Sheikh-e Abad near Kermanshah—likely Nod. Noah’s descendants, led perhaps by Cush (Nimrod’s father), reach Shinar. Göbekli Tepe (9500–9000 BCE) in Anatolia and Nemrik’s taupe-walled homes (9th millennium BCE) predate Mesopotamian fired bricks. Ganj Dareh and Tepe Abdul Hosein (8000 BCE) used sun-dried bricks, Bestansur (7700–7100 BCE) fired ones. Tepe Gawra’s terracotta bricks date to 4500 BCE, Ur’s paved roads to 3500 BCE. Migrants likely adopted local brick-firing, limited by fuel scarcity.

The "tower" resembles a ziggurat, like Eridu’s temple (5400 BCE), Uruk’s White Temple (3450 BCE), or Ur’s Nanna ziggurat (22nd century BCE), a 30-meter stepped pyramid with a 64×46-meter base of mud bricks, clad in fired brick. Its lost summit temple symbolized divine elevation. The Genesis author, possibly envisioning such ruins, crafts a poetic narrative, likely not the physician-encyclopedist but a Mesopotamian kin.

Migrants used "mountain resin"—bitum—for mortar, known in the Zagros at Sheikh-e Abad (10,000–7590 BCE) and Jani (8240–7730 BCE). Ali Kosh and Chagha Sefid (7200–6800 BCE) used bitum, as did Uruk (late 5th millennium BCE) and Ur for waterproofing and construction.

Shinar’s settlers, fleeing drought (6255–6195 BCE), joined established Mesopotamian communities—Proto-Hassuna (7000–6500 BCE), Hassuna, Samarra, Halaf (6100–5100 BCE), and Ubaid (6500–4200 BCE). Competition for resources favored innovative tribes. Sumerians, possibly from mountains, reached Eridu by 5500 BCE or later (3500 BCE), forming the Sumerian civilization (~4000 BCE) from Ubaid, Uruk, and Jemdet Nasr cultures. Sumerians called themselves "black-headed." Genesis’s tribe picks a name to unify, left unrevealed.

Sumer fell to Akkad by 2370 BCE under Sargon, blending cultures (2400–2000 BCE). Babylon rose under Hammurabi (~1750 BCE), with Akkadian dominating by 2000 BCE, later yielding to Aramaic (7th–6th centuries BCE).

The flood and migration tale has scientific basis, likely oral initially, perhaps in Sumerian. Genesis draws from Gilgamesh’s Babylonian epic, rooted in a Sumerian myth (2017 BCE). Writing began in Uruk (3350–3000 BCE), with Sumerian cuneiform by 3200–3100 BCE, adapted for Akkadian. Hebrew script emerged ~11th–10th century BCE. The flood myth, written by 3350 BCE, was refined in Akkadian (2017–1600 BCE), not Hebrew until ~1100 BCE, possibly Egyptian earlier, hinted by the pyramid-like tower, comparing Nile and Mesopotamian civilizations.

Noah’s genealogy lists real places—Babel (Babylon), Erech (Uruk), Akkad (Agade), Nineveh, Gaza—mostly from J (828–722 BCE). Uruk and Gaza date to 4000 and 3000 BCE, Akkad to 2350–2200 BCE, Babylon to ~1770 BCE, Nineveh to the 3rd millennium BCE, fading after 612 BCE. The flood legend solidified pre-612 BCE, its motifs older, tied to warming 11,270 years ago and migration during cooling ~6225 BCE. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE GIFTS OF THE MAGI FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS

  Translation of the article:   Архипов СВ. Новая техника проксимального крепления при реконструкции ligamentum capitis femoris: Дары волхвов ортопедическим хирургам. The text in Russian is available at the following link:  2026АрхиповСВ .  A Novel Technique for Proximal Fixation of Ligamentum Capitis Femoris Reconstruction: The Gifts of the Magi for Orthopedic Surgeons S.V. Arkhipov, Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland     CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   Introduction [iii]   Materials and Methods [iv]   Technique [v]   Discussion [vi]   Conclusion [vii]   Appendix [viii]   References [ix]   Structured Abstract [x]   Additional material [i]   Abstract An experimental technique for reconstruction of the ligamentum capitis femoris (ligamentum teres femoris) is described. The proposed method involves creating two portions of the ligament analog: a pubic portion and an ischial portion. Fixation of thes...

2025SarassaC_HerreraAM

  Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   References [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Abstract of the article : Sarassa C. et al . I ntraosseous Tunneling and Ligamentum Teres Ligamentodesis “Teretization” to Enhance S tability in Congenital Hip Dislocation Surgery: Surgical Technique and Mid-Term Outcomes (2025). The article describes a technique for fixing the femoral head using the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in congenital hip dislocation. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 2025SarassaC_HerreraAM . [ii]   Original text Abstract Background Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with complete dislocation (grade ≥III) in older patients often requires open reduction. However, achieving long-term stability remains challenging. This study introduces and evaluates a novel surgical technique, intraosseous tunneling ...

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?

  Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?  A Medical Hypothesis By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD & Lyudmila N. Arkhipova, BSN     CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   Introduction [iii]   Egyptian physician [iv]   Asian diviner [v]   Conclusion [vi]   References [vii]   Application [i]   Abstract The Book of Genesis is an example of an ancient literary text that contains important medical insights. We propose that it was written in northern Egypt in the late 17th century BCE, approximately ten years after the Minoan eruption. The protograph likely emerged from the collaboration between an Asiatic seer, who rose to the rank of an Egyptian official, and an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist. By refining its dating and authorship, this hypothesis positions Genesis as a credible source of medical and historical data, thereby enhancing its value for interdisciplinary research. [ii]   Introduction According to Rabbinic Judais...

Full access to the PDF version of the book: HUMAN CHILDREN

  Full access to the PDF version of the book is now available: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. (In Russian)].  Google Play  ,  Google Book , drive.google.com   ,   kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com   [Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу : Издание Автора , 2025.]   Annotation The first version of the Book of Genesis appeared in Ancient Egypt approximately 3,600 years ago, during the Hyksos period. The work was conceived as a fairy tale epic. An unknown physician-encyclopedist, who is also presumed to have authored the Edwin Smith Papyrus, played a role in its composition. He supplemented the co-author's family legends, retellings of halluc...

2012MansmannKA

  Invention (Patent Application Publication): Mansmann KA. Tendon-sparing implants for arthroscopic replacement of hip cartilage. WO2012162571A1 (2012).  The original text of the document contained defects.   WO2012162571A1S US Inventor: Kevin A. Mansmann Worldwide applications 2012 WO Application PCT/US2012/039481 events: 2012-05-24 Application filed by Mansmann Kevin A 2012-11-29 Publication of WO2012162571A1   Tendon-sparing implants for arthroscopic replacement of hip cartilage Kevin A. Mansmann   Abstract Surgical implant devices are disclosed which will allow completely arthroscopic resurfacing of the acetabular socket, and the femoral head, in hip joints, in both humans, and in animals such as dogs. Such devices, made of flexible polymers with smooth articulating surfaces and porous anchoring surfaces, can be provided with centered openings, to allow a surgeon to spare the major ligament (the ligamentum teres) which connects the femoral head to the pelv...

1753TarinP

  Fragments from the book Tarin P. Ostéo-graphie (1753). The author notes the localization of ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) and uses synonyms: ligament rond, ligamentum teres capitis femoris. The text is prepared for machine translation using a service built into the blog from Google or your web browser. Quote p. 24 Les Ligamens de l'extrémité inférieure sont, 1°. la Membrane capsulaire, &c. de la cavité cotyloïde, le Ligament rond, l'Appareil ligamenteux propre à cette cavité; le Ligament transveríal interne de son bord, le transversal externe, les deux Ligamens glanduleux; … Quote p. 54. Illæ tres offeæ portiones simul unitæ Cavitatem cotyloïdeam q.t. a. constituunt, in qua occurrit Foveols h. glandulas synoviales articulationis excipiens, cuique sesc inserit ligamentum teres capitis femoris, &c. Vid. t. u. v. TAB. I. II. III. External links Tarin P. Ostéo-graphie, ou Description des os de l'adulte, du foetus, &c. Precedée d'une introduction a l'etu...

NEWS 2026

New publications of our resource   in 2026 The initial phase of collecting data on LCF, accumulated prior to the 20th century, is largely complete. Next, we plan to analyze and synthesize thematic information, adding data from the 20th and 21st centuries. The work will focus primarily on: prevention, diagnosis, arthroscopy, plastic surgery, and endoprosthetics.   January 22, 2026 Full access to the PDF version of the book: Human Children January 16, 2026 The necessary is needed by no one   (facebook) January 15, 2026 Tweet of January 15, 2026      A Novel Technique for Proximal Fixation   (facebook) January 14, 2026 2026 ArkhipovSV.  THE GIFTS OF THE MAGI FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS ( A Novel Technique for Proximal Fixation of Ligamentum Capitis Femoris Reconstruction ). January 05, 2026 2018YoussefAO The article describes a me thod for transposition of the proximal attachment of the LCF in congenital hip dislocation.   2007WengerD_O...

Tweet of January 15, 2026

  A Novel Technique for Proximal Fixation of Ligamentum Capitis Femoris Reconstruction: The Gifts of the Magi for Orthopedic Surgeons.  DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25269.33763   https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2026/01/the-gifts-of-magi-for-orthopedic.html Tweet of January 15, 2026 #ligamentum_teres   #hip_joint #arthroscopy #reconstruction BLOG CONTENT TWITTER OR X                                                                            

TWITTER or X

  TWITTER OR X  (Publications on platform X or Twitter) Tweet of December 31, 2025   Tweet of December 30, 2025 Tweet of December 29, 2025 Tweet of December 19, 2025 T weet of November 20, 2025 Tweet of September 21, 2025 Tweet of August 30, 2025 Tweet of July 31, 2025 Tweet of July 28, 2025 Tweet of July 8, 2025 Tweet of June 24, 2025 Tweet of June 22, 2025   Tweet of June 20, 2025    Tweet of May 5, 2025 Tweet of May3, 2025 Tweet of April 9, 2025 Tweet of March 12, 2025   ( Survey ) Tweet of February 28, 2025 Tweet of February 22, 2025 Tweet of February 8, 2025 Tweet of January 18, 2025 Tweet of January 7, 2025 Tweet of January 4, 2025 Tweet of December 31, 2024 Tweet of October 30, 2024 Tweet of October 8, 2024 Tweet of August 5, 2024 Tweet of Jul 29, 2024  Tweet of Jul 26, 2024 Tweet of Jul 22, 2024   Tweet of Jul 17, 2024   Tweet of Jul 12, 2024   Tweet of Jul 11, 2024   Tweet of Jul 7, 2024 Tweet of Jul 6, 2024   Twe...