Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 1

   

Short retelling of chapter 1 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 1. THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD

The Bible stands as a remarkable testament to religious and philosophical thought, passed down through the ages with minimal alterations. At its core lies a collection of texts rooted in the sacred writings of Jewish and Samaritan traditions, known as the Torah, meaning "Law" or "Teaching." In its narrowest sense, the Torah comprises the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, collectively called the Tanakh—an acronym derived from the Hebrew terms for "Law/Teaching" (Torah), "Prophets" (Nevi’im), and "Writings" (Ketuvim). Beyond this Written Torah, there exists an Oral Torah, which includes the Mishnah, Talmud, and Midrash, offering interpretations and expansions of the written texts. The Written Torah itself is divided into five interconnected narratives: Genesis (Bereishit), Exodus (Shemot), Leviticus (Vayikra), Numbers (Bamidbar), and Deuteronomy (Devarim). Outside Jewish tradition, these books are often referred to as the Pentateuch, forming part of the Christian Old Testament, which aligns closely with the Tanakh. Scholars generally agree that this collection was compiled between the 10th and 2nd centuries BCE, though no part of the Pentateuch bears an explicit author’s name, leaving its authorship a matter of ongoing debate.

The title of the first book, Bereishit, translates from Hebrew as "In the beginning," drawn from the opening phrase of its initial chapter. Traditionally attributed to Moses, the legendary figure of the Old Testament, it is sometimes called the First Book of Moses. It is believed to have been originally composed in ancient Hebrew. In Greek, the text is known as Genesis ("Origin"), and in Latin, it carries the same name, signifying "Beginning." Religious sources pinpoint the composition of Genesis, and indeed the entire Torah, to around 1280 BCE. The eighth principle of faith, articulated by the medieval theologian Maimonides (1135/38–1204), asserts that Moses transcribed the Torah directly from divine dictation on Mount Sinai. However, historical accounts vary. The Jewish Encyclopedia places Moses’ activity between 1450 and 1400 BCE, while the ancient historian Josephus Flavius (1st century CE) suggested that Moses authored only the second book, Exodus, around 1985 BCE, implying Genesis predated his time. In academic circles, some propose that Hebrew writing could trace back to the 14th century BCE, though the earliest surviving texts date to the late 11th or early 10th century BCE. These discrepancies highlight a broad range of estimates—spanning 1,000 to 1,800 years—for the dating of this foundational work. Pinpointing the timeline of the Torah’s creation could clarify the historical or mythical nature of its figures and events.

The biblical saga begins with a narrative of the universe’s earliest moments and humanity’s origins. According to Genesis, just a century or two ago, many people envisioned the world’s creation as described in its verses. Notably, the text presents two distinct accounts of the world’s formation. The first, spanning two chapters, bears resemblance to an evolutionary framework, detailing the process with vivid imagery. Biblical scholar Richard Friedman (born 1946) has argued persuasively that this section derives from a mysterious source labeled "P" (for "Priest") by experts. This source is thought to have been penned by an unknown priest in Judah, likely in Jerusalem, during the reign of King Hezekiah (715–687 BCE).

In one version of Genesis’ creation story, God fashions the heavens, earth, and waters on the first day, separating light from darkness. A modern reader might interpret this as an ancient attempt to describe Earth’s formation and the cycle of day and night. The text explicitly notes, "The earth was formless and void," underscoring its chaotic beginnings. The second day focuses on organizing water in the natural world. On the third day, God creates land and seas, planting seed-bearing grasses and fruit-bearing trees. The fourth day sees the creation of the sun—"the greater light to rule the day"—the moon—"the lesser light to rule the night"—and the stars. On the fifth day, God brings forth great sea creatures, creeping things that teem in the waters, and winged birds. The sixth day witnesses the creation of land animals—wild beasts, cattle, and creeping things—followed by humanity, made as male and female. The seventh day is reserved for rest, marking the completion of this laborious act.

Yet, contemporary evidence suggests a far lengthier process for the emergence of physical, chemical, biological, and social matter. The observable universe, measured through cosmic microwave background anisotropy, is approximately 13.787 billion years old (±20 million years). The earliest stages of cosmic formation remain only partially understood by theoretical physicists. The Big Bang theory and the concept of spatial expansion explain the progression from subatomic particles to molecules and the onset of time. Before expanding from an infinitesimally small point, the universe’s prior state eludes comprehension, perhaps due to an inherent cosmic amnesia. Over eons, massive clouds of plasma, molecules, and dust coalesced, giving rise to stars. Generations of stars, igniting and collapsing, synthesized diverse chemical elements through nuclear reactions.

The Sun formed over at least 10 million years from the compression of molecular gas and remnants of ancient stars. Around 4.5682–4.567 billion years ago, the Solar System emerged, comprising a central star and a protoplanetary disk of gas and dust. The oldest meteoritic inclusions solidified 4.568–4.565 billion years ago, with chondritic accretion occurring within 3 million years later. The Earth-Moon-meteorite system is dated to 4.55–4.51 billion years with 1% precision, marking the onset of humanity’s cradle.

The origin of Earth’s water remains debated, though water is abundant in space. Isotopic analysis reveals that water on Earth, the Moon, and carbonaceous chondrite meteorites is indistinguishable, suggesting either a shared origin or later delivery via meteorite impacts. Experimental evidence supports the latter, with water detected in 4.406-billion-year-old lithospheric particles, indicating liquid water existed within 160 million years of Earth’s formation. This aligns with the presence of water in the Sun’s accretion disk, potentially supplying Earth with one to three oceans’ worth. Cosmic impacts, notably the "Late Heavy Bombardment" 3.92–3.85 billion years ago, likely contributed additional water, with comets possibly accounting for half of Earth’s reserves.

The biblical account, while poetic, contrasts with this scientific timeline. Its first creation narrative, likely authored in Judah between 715 and 687 BCE, reflects a geocentric worldview and archaic notions of biodiversity. Unlike modern taxonomy—pioneered by Carl Linnaeus in the 18th century—it omits viruses, microbes, sponges, jellyfish, algae, mosses, ferns, fungi, worms, crustaceans, insects, and mollusks. This is unsurprising, given the era’s limited understanding.

Still, the ancient text’s contribution to human thought endures. Its creation story, though differing in details, echoes early scientific curiosity. Egyptian myths, older still, offer parallel insights. The Memphis theology describes a lifeless ocean (Nun) and a god, Ptah, who wills his form into being. In Heliopolis, chaos (Nun) births Atum, the first god. These ideas, dating back 5,000 years, suggest an evolution of thought: from water alone to water and land. Genesis’ narratives—one akin to Heliopolis, the other to Memphis—read like a scholarly synthesis of Egyptian cosmology, adapted by Jewish sages. The Memphis view, positing an initial watery chaos, aligns more closely with modern science, adjusted for millennia of progress. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?

  Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?  A Medical Hypothesis By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD & Lyudmila N. Arkhipova, BSN     CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   Introduction [iii]   Egyptian physician [iv]   Asian diviner [v]   Conclusion [vi]   References [vii]   Application [i]   Abstract The Book of Genesis is an example of an ancient literary text that contains important medical insights. We propose that it was written in northern Egypt in the late 17th century BCE, approximately ten years after the Minoan eruption. The protograph likely emerged from the collaboration between an Asiatic seer, who rose to the rank of an Egyptian official, and an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist. By refining its dating and authorship, this hypothesis positions Genesis as a credible source of medical and historical data, thereby enhancing its value for interdisciplinary research. [ii]   Introduction According to Rabbinic Judais...

13c.Soligalich

   Soligalich , icon, Jacob wrestling with the angel ( 13 cent. ).   Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob wa s left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not pre vail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Soligalich  – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel ( 13 cent. ); original in the  leonovval...

CRITICAL MASS OF CONSENSUS

Online version from 07/03/2025   Critical mass of consensus:  Opinions on the importance of ligamentum capitis femoris (XX-XXI century) Arkhipov S . V. Content [i]   Abstract [ii]   Opinions [iii]   Authors & Affiliations [iv]   References [v]   Appendices [i]   Abstract This evolving article collects views on the importance of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) to the musculoskeletal system. Our collection aims to highlight the emerging fundamental shift in the current consensus in the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal research communities regarding the meaning of LCF. Here the convinced convince others. Ultimately, this once-unconventional idea will become established knowledge, enabling a transformation in clinicians’ thinking and in approaches to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hip joint pathologies. [ii]   Opinions   2025 «The LT [LCF] works as a secondary static stabilizer of the hip by acting as a sling to preven...

Main Scheme

  Interaction of ligaments of the hip joint and muscles during single-leg support  BLOG CONTENT IMAGES AND VIDEOS

LCF in 2025 (May)

  LCF in 2025 (May): Quotes from articles and books published in May 2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris. Teytelbaum, D. E., Bijanki, V., Samuel, S. P., Silva, S., Israel, H., & van Bosse, H. J. Does Open Reduction of Arthrogrypotic Hips Cause Stiffness?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics , 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002940  [i]   journals.lww.com   SANTORI, N., & TECCE, S. M. (2025). FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ARTHROSCOPY FOR HIP TRAUMA. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 136-143.  [ii]   books.google   RANDELLI, F. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC FREE-BODY REMOVAL AFTER DISLOCATION OR AFTER BULLET/BOMB. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 1-11.  [iii]   books.google   APRATO, A. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES FOR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE REDUCTION AND FIXATION. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 38.  [iv]   books.google   Brinkman, J. C., & Hartigan, D. E. (2025). Indications f...

INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY

  Combined PDF version of the article: Arkhipov SV. Arkhipov SV. Inferior Portal for Hip A rthroscopy: A Pilot Experimental Study. This page contains a photocopy of the publication. The links for downloading the PDF version and the addresses of the online versions are given below.  The original in Russian is available at the link: Нижний портал для артроскопии тазобедренного сустава . 

Inferior Portal. Part 2.

  Original in Russian is available at the link:  Нижний портал. Часть 2.  below is a machine translation edited by a non-native speaker.     INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY: A PILOT STUDY PART 2.  Inferior Portal Prototypes Arkhipov S.V., Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland   CONTENTS PART 1.  Background and Hypothesis [1] . Introduction [2] .  Passage through the Inferior Portal [3] .  Main Advantages of the Proposed Technique [4] .  Specific Risks of the Proposed Technique [5] .  Main Limitations of the Proposed Technique [6] . References (Part 1)   PART 2. Inferior Portal Prototypes [7] . Open Reduction [8] .  Puncture and Arthrography [9] . Arthroscopy and Debridement [10] . References (Part 2)   [7] . Open  R eduction   Our idea to reduce the trauma of hip joint surgery through an inferior approach has a rich history. In the spring of 1907, Professor Karl Rudolf Ludloff (1864-1945, photo )...

ARTICLE ANNOUNCEMENT: THE BOOK OF BERESHIT AS A GREAT COMPILATION

  Article Announcement: «The Book of Bereshit as a Great Compilation of Texts and Meanings from the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt: A Pilot Culturological, Medical, Archaeological, and Textological Examination of the Legends versus Traditional Attribution»   By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD  Joensuu, Finland   Abstract The Book of Bereshit (Genes is) was composed in Egypt during the 17th century BCE and reached its definitive protographic form following the Minoan eruption  of Thera . This study argues that the work was a collaborative effort between an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist and an outstanding scribe of Asiatic origin, operating within a sophisticated administrative and scientific framework. By analyzing anatomical descriptions, Bronze Age economic data, and climatic markers, this paper demonstrates that the text originated as a high-level socio-political commission within the Egyptian House of Life. Keywords Genesis Protograph, Bereshi...

LCF in 2026 (January)

  L CF in 2026 ( January )   (Quotes from articles and books published in  January  2026 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris)   Villegas Meza, A. D., Nocek, M., Felan, N. A., Speshock, A., Bolia, I. K., & Philippon, M. J. (2025). Hip Microinstability: Current Concepts in Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Outcomes A Narrative Review. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine , 205-221.   [i]   tandfonline.com   ,   dovepress.com   Wang, C. H., Wang, J. H., Lin, Y. H., Shih, C. A., & Hong, C. K. (2026). An Unusual Mechanical Cause of Hip Subluxation Following Modified Dunn Procedure for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Case Report. Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders , 10-4103.   [ii]     journals.lww.com   Alsaghaier, A. (2026). Results of spica cast in treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children between 6-18 Months. Journal of Academic Research , 30 , 28-43.   [...