Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 1

   

Short retelling of chapter 1 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 1. THE BEGINNING OF THE WORLD

The Bible stands as a remarkable testament to religious and philosophical thought, passed down through the ages with minimal alterations. At its core lies a collection of texts rooted in the sacred writings of Jewish and Samaritan traditions, known as the Torah, meaning "Law" or "Teaching." In its narrowest sense, the Torah comprises the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, collectively called the Tanakh—an acronym derived from the Hebrew terms for "Law/Teaching" (Torah), "Prophets" (Nevi’im), and "Writings" (Ketuvim). Beyond this Written Torah, there exists an Oral Torah, which includes the Mishnah, Talmud, and Midrash, offering interpretations and expansions of the written texts. The Written Torah itself is divided into five interconnected narratives: Genesis (Bereishit), Exodus (Shemot), Leviticus (Vayikra), Numbers (Bamidbar), and Deuteronomy (Devarim). Outside Jewish tradition, these books are often referred to as the Pentateuch, forming part of the Christian Old Testament, which aligns closely with the Tanakh. Scholars generally agree that this collection was compiled between the 10th and 2nd centuries BCE, though no part of the Pentateuch bears an explicit author’s name, leaving its authorship a matter of ongoing debate.

The title of the first book, Bereishit, translates from Hebrew as "In the beginning," drawn from the opening phrase of its initial chapter. Traditionally attributed to Moses, the legendary figure of the Old Testament, it is sometimes called the First Book of Moses. It is believed to have been originally composed in ancient Hebrew. In Greek, the text is known as Genesis ("Origin"), and in Latin, it carries the same name, signifying "Beginning." Religious sources pinpoint the composition of Genesis, and indeed the entire Torah, to around 1280 BCE. The eighth principle of faith, articulated by the medieval theologian Maimonides (1135/38–1204), asserts that Moses transcribed the Torah directly from divine dictation on Mount Sinai. However, historical accounts vary. The Jewish Encyclopedia places Moses’ activity between 1450 and 1400 BCE, while the ancient historian Josephus Flavius (1st century CE) suggested that Moses authored only the second book, Exodus, around 1985 BCE, implying Genesis predated his time. In academic circles, some propose that Hebrew writing could trace back to the 14th century BCE, though the earliest surviving texts date to the late 11th or early 10th century BCE. These discrepancies highlight a broad range of estimates—spanning 1,000 to 1,800 years—for the dating of this foundational work. Pinpointing the timeline of the Torah’s creation could clarify the historical or mythical nature of its figures and events.

The biblical saga begins with a narrative of the universe’s earliest moments and humanity’s origins. According to Genesis, just a century or two ago, many people envisioned the world’s creation as described in its verses. Notably, the text presents two distinct accounts of the world’s formation. The first, spanning two chapters, bears resemblance to an evolutionary framework, detailing the process with vivid imagery. Biblical scholar Richard Friedman (born 1946) has argued persuasively that this section derives from a mysterious source labeled "P" (for "Priest") by experts. This source is thought to have been penned by an unknown priest in Judah, likely in Jerusalem, during the reign of King Hezekiah (715–687 BCE).

In one version of Genesis’ creation story, God fashions the heavens, earth, and waters on the first day, separating light from darkness. A modern reader might interpret this as an ancient attempt to describe Earth’s formation and the cycle of day and night. The text explicitly notes, "The earth was formless and void," underscoring its chaotic beginnings. The second day focuses on organizing water in the natural world. On the third day, God creates land and seas, planting seed-bearing grasses and fruit-bearing trees. The fourth day sees the creation of the sun—"the greater light to rule the day"—the moon—"the lesser light to rule the night"—and the stars. On the fifth day, God brings forth great sea creatures, creeping things that teem in the waters, and winged birds. The sixth day witnesses the creation of land animals—wild beasts, cattle, and creeping things—followed by humanity, made as male and female. The seventh day is reserved for rest, marking the completion of this laborious act.

Yet, contemporary evidence suggests a far lengthier process for the emergence of physical, chemical, biological, and social matter. The observable universe, measured through cosmic microwave background anisotropy, is approximately 13.787 billion years old (±20 million years). The earliest stages of cosmic formation remain only partially understood by theoretical physicists. The Big Bang theory and the concept of spatial expansion explain the progression from subatomic particles to molecules and the onset of time. Before expanding from an infinitesimally small point, the universe’s prior state eludes comprehension, perhaps due to an inherent cosmic amnesia. Over eons, massive clouds of plasma, molecules, and dust coalesced, giving rise to stars. Generations of stars, igniting and collapsing, synthesized diverse chemical elements through nuclear reactions.

The Sun formed over at least 10 million years from the compression of molecular gas and remnants of ancient stars. Around 4.5682–4.567 billion years ago, the Solar System emerged, comprising a central star and a protoplanetary disk of gas and dust. The oldest meteoritic inclusions solidified 4.568–4.565 billion years ago, with chondritic accretion occurring within 3 million years later. The Earth-Moon-meteorite system is dated to 4.55–4.51 billion years with 1% precision, marking the onset of humanity’s cradle.

The origin of Earth’s water remains debated, though water is abundant in space. Isotopic analysis reveals that water on Earth, the Moon, and carbonaceous chondrite meteorites is indistinguishable, suggesting either a shared origin or later delivery via meteorite impacts. Experimental evidence supports the latter, with water detected in 4.406-billion-year-old lithospheric particles, indicating liquid water existed within 160 million years of Earth’s formation. This aligns with the presence of water in the Sun’s accretion disk, potentially supplying Earth with one to three oceans’ worth. Cosmic impacts, notably the "Late Heavy Bombardment" 3.92–3.85 billion years ago, likely contributed additional water, with comets possibly accounting for half of Earth’s reserves.

The biblical account, while poetic, contrasts with this scientific timeline. Its first creation narrative, likely authored in Judah between 715 and 687 BCE, reflects a geocentric worldview and archaic notions of biodiversity. Unlike modern taxonomy—pioneered by Carl Linnaeus in the 18th century—it omits viruses, microbes, sponges, jellyfish, algae, mosses, ferns, fungi, worms, crustaceans, insects, and mollusks. This is unsurprising, given the era’s limited understanding.

Still, the ancient text’s contribution to human thought endures. Its creation story, though differing in details, echoes early scientific curiosity. Egyptian myths, older still, offer parallel insights. The Memphis theology describes a lifeless ocean (Nun) and a god, Ptah, who wills his form into being. In Heliopolis, chaos (Nun) births Atum, the first god. These ideas, dating back 5,000 years, suggest an evolution of thought: from water alone to water and land. Genesis’ narratives—one akin to Heliopolis, the other to Memphis—read like a scholarly synthesis of Egyptian cosmology, adapted by Jewish sages. The Memphis view, positing an initial watery chaos, aligns more closely with modern science, adjusted for millennia of progress. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LCF in 2025 (September)

  LCF in 2025 ( September )   (Quotes from articles and books published in  September  2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris)   Zhang, Z., Dong, Q., Wang, T., You, H., & Wang, X. (2025). Redescription of the osteology and systematic of Panguraptor lufengensis (Neo-theropoda: Coelophysoidea).   01 September 2025. PREPRINT (Version 1)  [i]   researchsquare.com   Tripathy, S. K., Khan, S., & Bhagat, A. (2025). Surgical Anatomy of the Femoral Head. In A Practical Guide to Management of Femoral Head Fracture-Dislocation (pp. 1-13). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.   [ii]   link.springer.com   Yoon, B. H., Kim, H. S., Lim, Y. W., & Lim, S. J. (2025). Adhesive Capsulitis of the Hip: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Hip & pelvis , 37 (3), 171-177.    [iii]    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov      Bharath, C. M., Aswath, C. A., Ayyadurai, P., Srinivasan, P....

0cent.4Q158.1-2

  Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   Translation [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Fragments 1-2 of Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158.1-2, which previously contained part of Genesis 32 with a mention of ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). We have translated the reconstructed text of M.M. Zahn (2009). The English translation is available at: 0 cent .4 Q 158.1-2 . [ii]   Original text Photocopy   Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158, fragments 1-2 (Plate 138, Frag. 4 B-358482), material – parchment, text – Hebrew, period – Herodian. A screenshot of the original from The Leon Levy dead sea scrolls Digital Library collection, © 2025 Israel Antiquities Authority  deadseascrolls.org.il   (Fair use for criticism, study and comparison; sharpening, color correction, and captions done by us.).   Transcription Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158, fragments 1-2, lines 11...

EXTERNAL LIGAMENTS & LCF

  external ligaments & LCF First experiments to study the interaction of the external ligaments and the ligamentum capitis femoris in a model: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_6.html Pathological consequences of lengthening of the ligamentum capitis femoris: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_63.html   norm: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_50.html   #ligamentum_teres   #ligamentum_capitis_femoris   #hip   #biomechanics    Publication in the facebook group 03/27/2025.                                                                                                                     BLOG CONTE...

1802PalmeraniÁ

   Palmerani Á , drawing Jacob wrestling with the angel (1802 ).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not prevail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Ángel  Palmerani  – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel  ( 1802); original in the  a...

1971CracraftJ

   Content [i]   Annotaction [ii]   Original in  English [iii]   Illustrations [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotaction F ragment s of the article: Cracraft J. The functional morphology of the hind limb of the domestic pigeon, Columba livia. (1971). The author studied the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in the pigeon. Its strength is noted and its attachment areas and biomechanics are described. The LCF functions in conjunction with the posterior acetabular ligament. Translation into Russian is available at the link: 1971CracraftJ .  [ii]   Original in  English Quote, p. 182 TERES LIGAMENT The teres ligament (ter lig; fig. 2) arises from the dorsal portion of the head of the femur (fovea capitis; see Stolpe, 1932, p.165 ). A short and broad ligament, it curves ventromedially to the anteroventral edge of the inner opening of the acetabu...

1980WalkerJM

   Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   Illustrations [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Article : Walker JM. Growth characteristics of the fetal ligament of the head of femur: significance in congenital hip disease (1980). The author discusses the embryonic development and size of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in normal and dysplastic hips. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 1980WalkerJM . [ii]   Original text Growth Characteristics of the Fetal Ligament of the Head of Femur: Significance in congenital hip disease   J.M. WALKER, Ph.D.   Abstract   Measurement of the length and width of the ligament of the head of femur (ligamentum teres) in 140 normal human fetuses between 12 weeks and term provides limits for growth changes in this structure. These observations provide no morphological evid...

1910SuttonHA_DrinkerCK

  Fragments from the book Sutton HA, Drinker CK. Osteology and syndesmology (1910). The selected fragments discuss the anatomy and topography of the ligament of the femoral head (LCF). According to the authors, this structure has low strength, but Galen of Pergamon (2-3rd cent.) described it as «the strongest» ( 1829KühnCG ). [Eng] Quote 1. p. 76 . The Cotyloid Lig't., or Cartilage, surmounts the edge of the Acetabulum except where it is broken by the Notch. This ligament simply deepens the cavity. The centre of the Acetabulum, by a rough area, the Cotyloid Fossa, attaches the Ligamentum Teres. Quote 2. p. 79. Head. Slightly more than a half sphere in shape. An articular surface for the Acetabulum occupies it, except at a fossa which attaches the Ligamentum Teres. Quote 3. p. 86. Two connect the bones. They are: 1. Ligamentum Teres: — Weak. Passes between the centre of the Acetabulum and the oval fossa upon the Head of the Femur. It lies outside the synovial membrane. External link...

1541MondinoL_DryanderJ

  Fragment from the book Mondino de Luzzi, Dryander J. Anatomia Mundini (1541). An early description of the anatomy and role of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) is presented. The pathogenesis of lameness and soft tissue atrophy in LCF pathology is discussed. For more details, see the commentary in  1541MondinoL_DryanderJ [Rus] .  Quote p. 62. [Lat] De anatomia cruris [&] pedis. Postea eleua musculos & chordas &, uide ossa. Et primura est os foemoris supra quod fabricatae sunt spondiles dorsi: & per consequens totum corpus in parte inferiori habet pixidem quondam, in cuius concauitate locata est extremitas rotunda canna coxae, que uocatur uertebrum. Et in medio amborum in parte anteriori est quod dam ligamentum, quod aliomodo porestuocari uertebrum: & quando hoc uel primum resilit foras: tunc niecesse ed hominem claudicare, quia crus hic elongatur & firmari non potest; & totum non bene potest supportari: & necesse eit etiam ut crus tab...

18c.Augsburg

  Painting on glass from Augsburg – Jacob wrestling with the angel (18 cent.).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not prevail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Author unknown, painting on the reverse of glass from Augsburg – Jacob wrestling with the a...

1873MeyerGH

  Professor  Georg Hermann von Mayer discovered a pressure mark from the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) on the head of the femur. In the fragment presented to your attention, the author points out that the named depression indicates the tension of the LCF in the position of flexion and external rotation of the hip. This idea of Mayer was later repeatedly cited, see, for example, the work of Hermann Welcker  " Ueber das Hüftgelenk, nebst einigen Bemerkungenüber Gelenke überhaupt, insbesondere über das Schultergelenk " (1876). von Meyer GH. Die Statik und Mechanik des menschlichen Knochengerüstes. Edited, Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann; 1873. [fragment] Quote pp. 342-344   Neben der Gelenkkapsel befindet sich in dem Hüftgelenke noch ein eigenthümlicher Bandapparat, das ligamentum teres, über dessen Bedeutung sehr verschiedene Auffassung gefunden wird. Von der einen Seite wird ihm nämlich entschieden ...