Content
Background: Intraarticular hip
pain represents a substantial clinical challenge, with recent studies
implicating lesions in the ligamentum teres as potential contributors. Even
more so, damage to the ligamentum teres is particularly prevalent among young
patients undergoing joint-preserving interventions. Although several studies
have investigated the biomechanical attributes of the ligamentum teres,
inconsistencies in reported findings and reliance on cadaveric or animal models
have raised concerns regarding the extrapolation of results to clinical
practice. Furthermore, there is a lack of research examining ligamentum teres
biomechanics specifically within the relevant patient cohort-individuals who
benefit from joint-preserving surgical interventions.
Questions/purposes: We sought (1) to determine the
biomechanical properties (ultimate load to failure, tensile strength,
stiffness, and elastic modulus) of fresh-frozen ligaments from patients
undergoing surgical hip dislocation, and (2) to identify patient-specific
factors that are associated with them.
Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved study
on intraoperatively harvested ligamentum teres from 74 consecutive patients
undergoing surgical hip dislocation for joint preservation (August 2021 to
September 2022). After the exclusion of patients with previous surgery,
posttraumatic deformities, avascular necrosis, slipped capital femoral
epiphysis, and Perthes disease, 31 ligaments from 31 patients were analyzed.
The mean age of the study group was 27 ± 8 years, and 61% (19) of participants
were male. The main indication for surgery was femoroacetabular impingement.
Standardized AP pelvic and axial radiographs and CT scans were performed in all
patients for better radiological description of the population and to identify
associated radiological factors. The ligament was thoroughly transected at its
origin on the fossa acetabuli and at the insertion area on the fovea capitis
and stored at -20°C until utilization. Specimens were mounted to a materials
testing machine via custom clamps that minimized slippage and the likelihood of
failure at the clamp. Force-displacement and stress-strain curves were
generated. Ultimate failure load (N), tensile strength (MPa), stiffness (N/mm),
and elastic modulus (MPa) were determined. Using a multivariate regression
analysis and a subgroup analysis, we tested demographic, degenerative, and
radiographic factors as potential associated factors.
Results: The ligamentum teres demonstrated an ultimate load to
failure of 126 ± 92 N, and the tensile strength was 1 ± 1 MPa. The ligaments
exhibited a stiffness of 24 ± 15 N/mm and an elastic modulus of 7 ± 5 MPa.
After controlling for potential confounding variables like age, fossa/fovea
degeneration, and acetabular/femoral morphologies, we found that female sex was
an independent factor for higher tensile strength, stiffness, and elastic
modulus. Excessive femoral version was independently associated with lower load
to failure (HR 122 [95% CI 47 to 197]) and stiffness (HR 15 [95% CI 2 to 27]).
Damage to the acetabular fossa was associated with reduced load to failure (HR
-93 [95% CI -159 to -27]).
Conclusion: Overall, the ligamentum teres is a relatively weak
ligament. Sex, degeneration, and excessive femoral version are influencing
factors on strength of the ligamentum teres. The ligamentum teres exhibits
lower strength compared with other joint-stabilizing ligaments, which calls
into question its overall contribution to hip stability.
Clinical relevance: Young patients undergoing
hip-preserving surgery are the population at risk for ligamentum teres lesions.
Baseline values for load to failure, tensile strength, elastic modulus, and
stiffness are needed to better understand those lesions in this cohort of interest.
Copyright
© 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
![]() |
| Fig. 1 Patient selection is shown using a flowchart diagram. |
![]() |
| Fig. 2 This figure demonstrates the intraoperative ligament harvesting. (A) The ligament is resected at its origin on the transverse ligament and (B) at its origin on the fovea capitis of the femur. |
![]() |
| Fig. 3 The graph displays the typical load-displacement curve of the ligamentum teres. |
References
1. Attarian DE, McCrackin HJ, DeVito DP, McElhaney JH, Garrett WE. Biomechanical characteristics of human ankle ligaments. Foot Ankle. 1985;6:54-58. - PubMed
2. Bardakos NV, Villar RN. The ligamentum teres of the adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:8-15. - PubMed
3. Bechtel R. Physical characteristics of the axial interosseous ligament of the human sacroiliac joint. Spine J. 2001;1:255-259. - PubMed
4. Boardman ND, Debski RE, Warner JJP, et al. Tensile properties of the superior glenohumeral and coracohumeral ligaments. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:249-254. - PubMed
5. Byrd JWT, Jones KS. Traumatic rupture of the ligamentum teres as a source of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:385-391. - PubMed
6. Chandrasekaran S, Martin TJ, Close MR, Suarez-Ahedo C, Lodhia P, Domb BG. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the ligamentum teres: a case series in four patients with connective tissue disorders and generalized ligamentous laxity. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016;3:358-367. - PMC - PubMed
7. Chandrashekar N, Mansouri H, Slauterbeck J, Hashemi J. Sex-based differences in the tensile properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech. 2006;39:2943-2950. - PubMed
8. Chen HH, Li AF, Li KC, Wu JJ, Chen TS, Lee MC. Adaptations of ligamentum teres in ischemic necrosis of human femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328:268-275. - PubMed
9. Cho H-J, Kwak D-S. Mechanical properties and characteristics of the anterolateral and collateral ligaments of the knee. Appl Sci. 2020;10:6266.
10. Costic RS, Vangura A, Fenwick JA, Rodosky MW, Debski RE. Viscoelastic behavior and structural properties of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13:305-310. - PubMed
11. Czuppon S, Prather H, Hunt DM, et al. Gender‐dependent differences in hip range of motion and impingement testing in asymptomatic college freshman athletes. PM R. 2017;9:660-667. - PMC - PubMed
12. Freedman JA, Adamson GJ, Bui C, Lee TQ. Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:958-964. - PubMed
13. Galbusera F, Innocenti B. Chapter 8 - Ligament and tendon biomechanics. In: Innocenti B, Galbusera F, eds. Human Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Academic Press; 2022:137-149.
14. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1119-1124. - PubMed
15. Gray AJ, Villar RN. The ligamentum teres of the hip: an arthroscopic classification of its pathology. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:575-578. - PubMed
16. Han H, Kubo A, Ishizaka M, Maruyama H. Differences in the total hip rotation range of motion between sides in healthy young Japanese adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021;33:57-62. - PMC - PubMed
17. Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, Guilak F, Vail TP. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:82-89. - PubMed
18. Jones R, Nawana N, Pearcy M, et al. Mechanical properties of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1995;10:339-344. - PubMed
19. Jung H-J, Fisher MB, Woo SL-Y. Role of biomechanics in the understanding of normal, injured, and healing ligaments and tendons. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1:9. - PMC - PubMed
20. Kivlan BR, Richard Clemente F, Martin RL, Martin HD. Function of the ligamentum teres during multi-planar movement of the hip joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1664-1668. - PubMed
21. Lorda‐Diez CI, Canga‐Villegas A, Cerezal L, et al. Comparative transcriptional analysis of three human ligaments with distinct biomechanical properties. J Anat. 2013;223:593-602. - PMC - PubMed
22. Mattucci SFE, Moulton JA, Chandrashekar N, Cronin DS. Strain rate dependent properties of younger human cervical spine ligaments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;10:216-226. - PubMed
23. Menge TJ, Mitchell JJ, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Anatomic arthroscopic ligamentum teres reconstruction for hip instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e737-e742. - PMC - PubMed
24. Michels F, Taylan O, Stockmans F, Vereecke E, Scheys L, Matricali G. The different subtalar ligaments show significant differences in their mechanical properties. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28:1014-1020. - PubMed
25. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1169-1176. - PubMed
26. Perumal V, Scholze M, Hammer N, Woodley S, Nicholson H. Load-deformation properties of the ligament of the head of femur in situ. Clin Anat. 2019;33:705-713. - PubMed
27. Perumal V, Woodley SJ, Nicholson HD. Ligament of the head of femur: a comprehensive review of its anatomy, embryology, and potential function. Clin Anat. 2016;29:247-255. - PubMed
28. Peters AE, Geraghty B, Bates KT, Akhtar R, Readioff R, Comerford E. Ligament mechanics of ageing and osteoarthritic human knees. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:954837. - PMC - PubMed
29. Philippon MJ, Rasmussen MT, Turnbull TL, et al. Structural properties of the native ligamentum teres. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2:2325967114561962. - PMC - PubMed
30. Pintar FA, Yoganandan N, Myers T, Elhagediab A, Sances A. Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. J Biomech. 1992;25:1351-1356. - PubMed
31. Race A, Amis AA. The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech. 1994;27:13-24. - PubMed
32. Regan WD, Korinek SL, Morrey BF, An KN. Biomechanical study of ligaments around the elbow joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:170-179. - PubMed
33. Schleifenbaum S, Prietzel T, Hädrich C, Möbius R, Sichting F, Hammer N. Tensile properties of the hip joint ligaments are largely variable and age-dependent – an in-vitro analysis in an age range of 14–93 years. J Biomech. 2016;49:3437-3443. - PubMed
34. Scholze M, Singh A, Lozano PF, et al. Utilization of 3D printing technology to facilitate and standardize soft tissue testing. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11340. - PMC - PubMed
35. Seitz A, Kasisari R, Claes L, Ignatius A, Dürselen L. Forces acting on the anterior meniscotibial ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1488-1495. - PubMed
36. Siegler S, Block J, Schneck CD. The mechanical characteristics of the collateral ligaments of the human ankle joint. Foot Ankle. 1988;8:234-242. - PubMed
37. Smeets K, Slane J, Scheys L, Claes S, Bellemans J. Mechanical analysis of extra-articular knee ligaments. Part one: native knee ligaments. Knee. 2017;24:949-956. - PubMed
38. Smeets K, Slane J, Scheys L, Forsyth R, Claes S, Bellemans J. The anterolateral ligament has similar biomechanical and histologic properties to the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1028-1035.e1. - PubMed
39. Stetzelberger VM, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. Intraarticular damage in patients undergoing surgical hip dislocation: beyond peripheral labral and chondral lesions. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20350.
40. Stetzelberger VM, Zurmühle CA, Hanauer M, et al. Reliability and reproducibility of a novel grading system for lesions of the ligamentous-fossa-foveolar complex in young patients undergoing open hip preservation surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10:232596712210987. - PMC - PubMed
41. Tannast M, Hanke MS, Zheng G, Steppacher SD, Siebenrock KA. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1234-1246. - PMC - PubMed
42. Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, et al. Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1199-1205. - PubMed
43. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540-1552. - PubMed
44. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182-190. - PubMed
45. Wenger D, Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R. The mechanical properties of the ligamentum teres: a pilot study to assess its potential for improving stability in children’s hip surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:408-410. - PubMed
46. Widmer J, Cornaz F, Scheibler G, Spirig JM, Snedeker JG, Farshad M. Biomechanical contribution of spinal structures to stability of the lumbar spine—novel biomechanical insights. Spine J. 2020;20:1705-1716. - PubMed
47. Wijdicks CA, Ewart DT, Nuckley DJ, Johansen S, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Structural properties of the primary medial knee ligaments. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1638-1646. - PubMed
48. Wilson WT, Deakin AH, Payne AP, Picard F, Wearing SC. Comparative analysis of the structural properties of the collateral ligaments of the human knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:345-351. - PubMed
49. Woo SL, Gomez MA, Sites TJ, Newton PO, Orlando CA, Akeson WH. The biomechanical and morphological changes in the medial collateral ligament of the rabbit after immobilization and remobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1200-1211. - PubMed
50. Woo SL-Y, Gomez MA, Woo Y-K, Akeson WH. Mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments: II. The relationships of immobilization and exercise on tissue remodeling. Biorheology. 1982;19:397-408. - PubMed
51. Zheng G, Tannast M, Anderegg C, Siebenrock KA, Langlotz F. Hip2Norm: an object-oriented cross-platform program for 3D analysis of hip joint morphology using 2D pelvic radiographs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007;87:36-45. - PubMed
52. Zwirner J, Koutp A, Vidakovic H, Ondruschka B, Kieser DC, Hammer N. Assessment of plantaris and peroneus tertius tendons as graft materials for ankle ligament reconstructions – a cadaveric biomechanical study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;115:104244. - PubMed
Stetzelberger VM, Nishimura H, Hollenbeck JF, Garcia A, Brown JR, Schwab JM, Philippon JM, Tannast M. How strong is the ligamentum teres of the hip? A biomechanical analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2024;482(9)1685-95. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov , journals.lww.com , ovid.com ;
PMID: 39158387 ; PMCID: PMC11343551 ; DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003124
Copyright © 2024 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
The work is cited in the following publications: К вопросу о прочности LCF.
Vera M Stetzelberger – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, HFR Cantonal Hospital, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
Haruki Nishimura – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Justin F M Hollenbeck – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Alexander Garcia – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Justin R Brown – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Joseph M Schwab – Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, HFR Cantonal Hospital, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Marc J Philippon – Steadman Philippon Research Institute, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Moritz Tannast – Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, HFR Cantonal Hospital, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, role, pathology, impingement, properties, strength, mechanical properties
NB! Fair practice / use: copied for the purposes of criticism, review, comment, research and private study in accordance with Copyright Laws of the US: 17 U.S.C. §107; Copyright Law of the EU: Dir. 2001/29/EC, art.5/3a,d; Copyright Law of the RU: ГК РФ ст.1274/1.1-2,7





Comments
Post a Comment