Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 8

 

Short retelling of chapter 1 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 8. THE LAND OF NOD

Cain’s family settled in the land of "Nod," where they established a "city." We propose this tribal group followed a route later known as the Great Khorasan Road, leading Cain, son of Adam, to the Kermanshah Valley in the central Zagros Mountains. There, we believe he founded the settlement of "Enoch," its remnants linked to the archaeological site of Sheikh-e Abad (34°36'42"N, 47°16'11"E). In this village, the newcomers mastered musical instruments, developed metalworking techniques, and some adopted nomadic herding, living in "tents with flocks." As a farmer, Cain likely preserved knowledge of agriculture. Favorable conditions, division of labor, and acquired skills probably fueled population growth among these settlers.

According to Genesis, 1,056 years after Adam’s death, Noah, a ninth-generation descendant, is born. During his lifetime, humanity faces a catastrophic event called the "Flood." The text describes the disaster unfolding gradually, worsening after Noah’s family takes refuge in a constructed vessel. For an unspecified reason, "seven days later, the floodwaters were upon the earth," though their source is unclear. The global cataclysm continues with relentless, torrential rain for forty days and nights. The waters "multiplied," mysteriously persisting without further precipitation, eventually covering "all the high mountains." The flood level rises for 150 days. Then, a wind arises, the rain ceases, and the "fountains of the deep" close. Until the tenth month, the waters gradually recede, "returning" somewhere unspecified, flowing between oft-mentioned mountains. A drying process follows, concluding the next year, "in the second month, on the twenty-seventh day." This climatic anomaly wipes out all land-dwelling creatures except Noah, his seven relatives, and the animals aboard the ark.

The text omits when this flood struck Earth. Could a deluge of biblical scale have occurred? Uncertainty persists about where Noah lived before the catastrophe and in what era.

We previously suggested Cain migrated to the Kermanshah Valley during global warming around 11,700 years ago (9750 BCE). A brief cooling, the Preboreal Oscillation, lasting 200–250 years, followed, ending around 11,270 ± 30 years ago (9270 ± 30 BCE) with a rapid 4 ± 1.5°C temperature rise. This shift to warm, wet conditions between 11,270 and 11,210 years ago spurred forest growth in modern-day Netherlands and the Baltic Sea region. In southwest Europe, regional coolness 11,270 years ago gave way to aridity, favoring xerophytes and conifers. Around 11,200 years ago, Latvian lakes saw increased organic deposition due to thriving diatoms and woody debris. Norway’s Barents Sea coast experienced a two-phase warming, peaking around 11,200 years ago, fostering continuous vegetation. By 11,150 years ago, northern Europe’s mild climate melted terrestrial ice sheets. In North America, lake ecosystems flourished 11,700 ± 70 and 11,150 ± 70 years ago, rapidly processing organic matter. Concurrently, the global ocean level rose in two stages due to freshwater influx, with sea levels climbing up to 250 centimeters per century between 11,500 and 8800 years ago. These observations lead us to hypothesize that a swift climatic anomaly—global warming around 11,270 years ago—underlies the biblical flood narrative.

Genesis states the flood began when Noah was 600 years old, "in the second month, on the seventeenth day," and ended "in the six hundred and first year, on the first day of the first month." Yet, the era remains unspecified. The Book of Jubilees, written between 153–105 BCE, offers a clue, stating the flood started in the twenty-seventh jubilee, fifth week, seventh year, and ended the following year, with Noah opening the ark’s hatch on the second month, twenty-seventh day, of the eighth year—dated as 1317 years from creation. Converted from the Hebrew to the Gregorian calendar, this places the flood’s onset on April 11, 2445 BCE, concluding May 9, 2443 BCE.

Using these dates, the disaster struck 4,470 years ago from 2025. However, the third millennium BCE saw uninterrupted human progress, with no record of a global flood. Ancient urban civilizations note population growth in Asia, North Africa, and likely worldwide. Earth’s five mass extinctions, the largest 251 million years ago, killed 90% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate families—long before humans existed, primarily affecting oceans, unlike Noah’s flood, which spared marine life.

Scholars observe that Genesis’s flood account draws from two hypothetical Judean sources: the "J source" (828–722 BCE) and the "P source" (715–687 BCE, possibly post-586 BCE). Both describe a planetary catastrophe, with waters covering "all high mountains."

Earth’s highest peak, Sagarmatha (Everest, 27°59'18"N, 86°55'30"E), stands at 8,848 meters. Per Genesis, ocean depth reached this height along current coastlines, rising "fifteen cubits" higher after forty days. Assuming a cubit equals roughly 0.5 meters, the flood’s surface hit 8,855.5 meters above today’s sea level.

Earth’s water resides in the mantle, atmosphere, oceans, lakes, rivers, snow, ice, aquifers, permafrost, compounds, and organisms, accumulating over 4,406 million years. Total volume is approximately 1.386 billion cubic kilometers, against Earth’s 1,083.21 billion cubic kilometer volume and 5.972 sextillion kilogram mass. The planet’s interior, at 410 kilometers deep, reaches 1,920°K (1,646.85°C) and 13.5 GPa, precluding vast liquid reservoirs underground.

The global ocean averages 3,682.2 meters deep, covering 361.84 million square kilometers, with a 1.3324 billion cubic kilometer volume. Mantle water, bound in minerals or melts, could form an 800-meter layer if released from 400–670 kilometers deep. The mantle’s transition zone holds 1–2% water by mass, with Earth’s non-core water equating to 2.6–8.3 oceans, though estimates range from 2.8 to 98.8, with 17.6 deemed reasonable.

Earth’s mean radius is 6,371 kilometers, increasing to 6,379.848 kilometers at Everest during the flood, assuming waters rose fifteen cubits above peaks. Covering Everest would require roughly 4.519 trillion cubic kilometers of water—over half Pluto’s 7.02 billion cubic kilometer volume. Mantle minerals could theoretically supply and reabsorb this volume, with Earth’s crust potentially redistributing it into cavities.

Some researchers suggest water arrived via carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, yet Genesis mentions no cosmic bombardment, only rain and the "great deep." Reasonably, adding 4.52 trillion cubic kilometers in forty days is implausible—equating to 221,200 millimeters per square meter daily (153,611.1 liters per minute, or 2.56 cubic meters per second). Norway’s Mardalsfossen waterfall (88 cubic feet per second) or India’s Nohkalikai (100 cubic feet per second) illustrate such flow.

Genesis notes the rains stopped after 150 days, and waters "went from the earth," draining and evaporating. Seven months later, mountain peaks emerged, and the ground dried. At 30°C, with strong airflow, 1.664 kilograms of water evaporates hourly per square meter. Over Earth’s 510 trillion square meter surface, 7,435 quintillion kilograms could vaporize yearly. The flood’s 4.519 trillion cubic meter volume, at 997 kilograms per cubic meter, weighs 4.506 quintillion kilograms. At this evaporation rate, without further rain, it would take 1,650.1 years to dissipate, assuming it escapes Earth’s gravity. Noah, living 950 years, wouldn’t witness the end. Did the author inflate his age to match the catastrophe’s scale?

Heating could hasten drying but would render water uninhabitable by denaturing proteins and depleting oxygen. Genesis confirms marine life survived, with only terrestrial creatures perishing. Rapid chemical binding of water into compounds, turning Earth into a chemical vat, isn’t considered.

These arguments suggest the flood was local, not global. Genesis exaggerates a hydrological disaster, typical of folk epics, likely recalling a tragic valley inundation in mountains, not a plain like Mesopotamia’s. This offers the most plausible explanation.

The text implies the flood began gradually, escalating with forty days of ceaseless rain. We propose initial water came from melting mountain snow and ice, followed by rainfall. Heavy precipitation often accompanies warming, especially near cyclone centers, though cold-sector rains are brief. We hypothesize the flood unfolded in mountains, repeatedly mentioned in Genesis. A "wind" heralds the disaster’s end, suggesting typical weather shifts and moisture-laden air movement. The flood level rises 150 days post-rain, explained by melting snowpacks, emptying highland lakes, and draining slope soils.

The author places the catastrophe among ridges, likely with perennial snows and glaciers. Only sustained warming could supply meltwater alongside rain, flowing downhill. The flood doesn’t end abruptly but recedes over six months, draining "back" naturally, not vanishing miraculously.

We propose the flood occurred in a Zagros basin west of the Iranian Plateau, where landslides or rockfalls blocked drainage. Gradual erosion of this natural dam allowed outflow, followed by spontaneous drying. Genesis suggests no mystical forces; high temperatures and vapor transport, driven by wind, dried the land. A mild climate emerged, evidenced by Noah’s post-flood vineyard—absent in "pre-flood" narratives. Ancient grape seeds, found in India (66 million years) and Colombia (60 million years), predate this.

Noah, who saved his family via the ark, remains enigmatic—his time, place, and prototype unclear. As Cain’s descendant, he likely lived in the same region. We suggest Cain migrated to the Zagros’s Kermanshah Valley (34°19'26"N, 47°04'25"E) before the 11,700-year-ago warming, with Noah born near the Preboreal Oscillation’s end (11,270 years ago). Today, Kermanshah is Iran’s agricultural hub, with warm summers, snowy winters, and diverse flora and fauna, once spanning 800,000 hectares of forest.

We believe a flood in this valley inspired Genesis’s tale, supported by the text’s focus on mountains. Noah’s use of "pitch" (bitumen, a mountain-derived oil byproduct) for the ark reinforces this. Genesis mentions "pitch pits" near mountains, used also for baby Moses’s basket. Sumerians employed bitumen from 3800–2500 BCE for adhesives, waterproofing, and masonry, while hominids in Syria used it 80,000–50,000 years ago for toolmaking.

Kermanshah lies at 1,350–1,392 meters elevation, its valley stretching northwest to southeast between Zagros ridges. The Gharehsoo River crosses it, feeding the Karkheh basin (50,000 square kilometers). Nearby valleys include Mahidasht (with Halashi, Robat, Kuzaran, Ravansar), Sahneh, and Mianrahan-Kamyaran (with Kamyaran). Javanrud thrives northwest, near Ban Galan valley.

Gharehsoo’s tributaries drain Ban Galan’s north, while its south feeds streams like Rudkhaneh-ye Hivas and Ab-i Marik, irrigating Mahidasht. Gharehsoo merges with the Raz Avar stream near Kermanshah, flowing southeast. At Tangeh-ye Do Ab (1,246 meters, 34°10'38"N, 47°20'46"E), it joins the Gamasiab, whose sources lie in highland valleys like Sib Anar (1,900 meters). Their confluence forms the Seymare, cutting a canyon through the Zagros, merging with the Zal to create the Karkheh, feeding the Hawizeh Marshes.

Gharehsoo’s 211-kilometer basin covers 5,793 square kilometers, 48% mountainous (up to 3,351 meters), 52% hills and plains (minimum 1,300 meters). Gamasiab’s 900-kilometer basin spans 11,040 square kilometers, with elevations from 1,275 to 3,680 meters. Together, their 16,833-square-kilometer watershed feeds the Seymare. If blocked, this could flood Kermanshah, Mahidasht, Sahneh, and Mianrahan-Kamyaran, with the lowest point at Cham-e Heydar (1,242 meters). Water reaching 1,409 meters could spill east toward Do Ab, or, at 1,430–1,440 meters, north via Ban Galan into the Sirwan, a Tigris tributary. This region, our "Land of Nod," encompasses these valleys and plains.

A second condition for flooding—beyond a Seymare blockage—is excessive inflow outpacing evaporation and filtration, causing severe inundation on the Gamasiab and Gharehsoo. For local flora and fauna, with mudslides and rockfalls, this would indeed be a "biblical flood."

While a global flood is theoretically possible, Earth’s water could cover all land, but preserving terrestrial life under such conditions defies geophysics and biochemistry. No material evidence supports a global catastrophe, and human populations never dwindled to eight individuals. Mass extinctions predate Homo sapiens.

We propose the flood legend stems from a real, large-scale inundation in a Zagros basin, likely Kermanshah and adjacent plains, corroborated by regional topography and drainage patterns. Genesis’s vaguer account targets a less educated audience, framing a natural disaster east of Mesopotamia, likely in the Zagros or Iranian Plateau. The tale, passed through generations, was exaggerated to cosmic proportions, as folklore often is.

Genesis reflects a scientific polish on a folk narrative, hinting at a brilliant consultant behind the text. This unknown scholar intuited Earth’s capacity to absorb vast water volumes, calling its depths the "abyss"—a term from Egyptian mythology, alongside sky, land, and sea, created by Ptah. The author grasps gravity’s role, noting water "went back" (draining and seeping), and the hydrological cycle, using "returning." Evaporation is distinguished as "the earth dried." Such phrases, with the 150-day flooding and ten-month drying timeline, lend credibility, though the era remains elusive, complicated by millennia-old intentional edits.

This effort to convey the catastrophe’s scale scientifically reveals an ancient polymath, versed in geography, locating Eden and Nod near Assyria, Arabia, and possibly the Hindu Kush (Kush) and Indus River (Gihon). This savant, perhaps widely traveled or highly educated, mastered agriculture, economics, botany, zoology, metallurgy, music, medicine, pottery, and warfare. Such erudition suggests a high-ranking figure, not a tribal chief but a leader in a civilized state. Dating the flood narrative’s creation could clarify where Genesis’s concept emerged. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CATALOG OF LITERATURE ON THE LCF

  Catalog of literature on the LCF (Books, articles, links, reference, mention …) NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE (8,000 to 2,000 years BCE)  https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/neolithic-and-bronze.html   IRON AGE (10th-1st century BCE) https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/iron-age.html   1st-10th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/1st-10th-century.html   11th-15th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/11th-15th-century.html   16th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/16th-century.html   17th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/17th-century.html   18th Century https :// roundligament . blogspot . com /2024/10/18 th - century . html   19th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/19th-century.html   20th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/20th-century.html   21st Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/21st-century.html BLOG CONTENT TH...

1833GerdyPN

  P.N. Gerdy, in his experiment, discovered tensioning of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) during thigh adduction. At the same time, it was noted for the first time that the consequence of LCF tension during hip adduction is a downward and lateral displacement of the femoral head. Normally, this mechanism provides unloading of the upper articular surfaces when supporting one leg (see 1874SavoryWS ). The translation from French was done in collaboration with ChatGPT 3.5.   Gerdy PN. Physiologie médicale, didactique et critique. T. 1. Paris: Librairie de Crochard, 1833. [fragment] Quote pp. 551-554   L'inclinaison de la cuisse en dehors, que l'on nomme son abduction, est un mouvement assez étendu, mais qui pourtant ne permet pas à la cuisse de se placer perpendiculairement à sa direction verticale. Les batteleurs peuvent se reposer sur un plan horizontal, les cuisses écartées en sens opposé. Dans l'inclinaison ...

LCF in 2025 (May)

  LCF in 2025 (May): Quotes from articles and books published in May 2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris. Teytelbaum, D. E., Bijanki, V., Samuel, S. P., Silva, S., Israel, H., & van Bosse, H. J. Does Open Reduction of Arthrogrypotic Hips Cause Stiffness?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics , 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002940  [i]   journals.lww.com   SANTORI, N., & TECCE, S. M. (2025). FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ARTHROSCOPY FOR HIP TRAUMA. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 136-143.  [ii]   books.google   RANDELLI, F. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC FREE-BODY REMOVAL AFTER DISLOCATION OR AFTER BULLET/BOMB. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 1-11.  [iii]   books.google   APRATO, A. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES FOR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE REDUCTION AND FIXATION. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 38.  [iv]   books.google   Brinkman, J. C., & Hartigan, D. E. (2025). Indications f...

1290Egerton1066

  Miniature Jacob Wrestling with the Angel from Egerton 1066 (ca. 1270 – 1290?).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not pre vail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Initial E from Egerton 1066 – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (ca. 1270 – 1290?) original ...

ChatGPT. Scientific Review On the Article: “Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective”

  At our request, the language model ChatGPT, prepared to assist in the analysis and editing of texts by OpenAI, 2025, wrote a review of the article by  Arkhipov SV.   Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective: A Note on the Mysterious ‘Dark Matter’ in the Hip Joint   ([Ru]  Архипов СВ .  Почему восстановление вертлужной губы может быть неэффективно?: Заметка о таинственной «темной материи» в тазобедренном суставе.  06.04.2025 ).  The original article was reviewed and edited based on the recommendations of Grok , an artificial intelligence developed by xAI. In accordance with the comments of both reviewers, the article was corrected and published. Below is the original text of the review by ChatGPT: Scientific Review and Critical Commentary On the article: “Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective: A Note on the Mysterious ‘Dark Matter’ in the Hip Joint” Author: S.V. Arkhipov, Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland I. Scientific...

INVITATION TO COOPERATION

  We offer cooperation in the following areas: - biomechanics of the hip joint in normal and pathological conditions; - hip joint endoprostheses with ligament analogues; - non-standard methods of arthroscopy of the hip joint; - reconstruction and prosthetics of the ligament of head of femur; - early diagnosis of coxarthrosis and pathology of the ligament of head of femur; - pathogenesis of dystrophic diseases of the hip joint; - joints with flexible elements for walking robots. Please send correspondence to: archipovlcfbooks&gmail.com With sincere respect to you, Sergey Arkhipov                                                                      . Translated from Russian in collaboration with ChatGPT (version 3.5, developed by OpenAI) and the Google Translate service. Original text: Мы п...

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

1996(c)ArkhipovSV

  Hip joint prostheses ( Протез тазобедренного сустава ) Patent Application RU96110383A Inventor Сергей Васильевич Архипов Original Assignee Sergey Vasilyevich Arkhipov Application RU96110383/14A events 1996-05-23 Application filed by С.В. Архипов 1998-08-10 Publication of RU96110383A Claims 1. The hip joint prosthesis comprising a femoral component, are fixed in the femoral head, characterized in that the femoral component is designed as a pyramid whose base has the form of a spherical surface, and the faces contains ledges perpendicular trabecular bone, in addition to the femoral component coupled to the flexible member, which is passed through a through hole formed in the femoral component, and the ends of the flexible member are provided with fastening elements. 2. The prosthesis of claim. 1, characterized in that the fastening elements are made of a metal with shape memory. 3. The prosthesis of claim. 1, characterized in that the faces of the femoral component have...

Main Scheme

  Interaction of ligaments of the hip joint and muscles during single-leg support  BLOG CONTENT IMAGES AND VIDEOS

ACETABULAR CANAL

   Acetabular Canal  (Anatomy, topography and significance of the functioning area of ​​the ligamentum capitis femoris) Acetabular Canal.  Part 1.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  Acetabular Canal.  Part 2.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  Acetabular Canal.  Part 3.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  BLOG CONTENT THE DOCTRINE OF LCF MORPHOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY                                                                                                          ...