Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 8

 

Short retelling of chapter 1 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 8. THE LAND OF NOD

Cain’s family settled in the land of "Nod," where they established a "city." We propose this tribal group followed a route later known as the Great Khorasan Road, leading Cain, son of Adam, to the Kermanshah Valley in the central Zagros Mountains. There, we believe he founded the settlement of "Enoch," its remnants linked to the archaeological site of Sheikh-e Abad (34°36'42"N, 47°16'11"E). In this village, the newcomers mastered musical instruments, developed metalworking techniques, and some adopted nomadic herding, living in "tents with flocks." As a farmer, Cain likely preserved knowledge of agriculture. Favorable conditions, division of labor, and acquired skills probably fueled population growth among these settlers.

According to Genesis, 1,056 years after Adam’s death, Noah, a ninth-generation descendant, is born. During his lifetime, humanity faces a catastrophic event called the "Flood." The text describes the disaster unfolding gradually, worsening after Noah’s family takes refuge in a constructed vessel. For an unspecified reason, "seven days later, the floodwaters were upon the earth," though their source is unclear. The global cataclysm continues with relentless, torrential rain for forty days and nights. The waters "multiplied," mysteriously persisting without further precipitation, eventually covering "all the high mountains." The flood level rises for 150 days. Then, a wind arises, the rain ceases, and the "fountains of the deep" close. Until the tenth month, the waters gradually recede, "returning" somewhere unspecified, flowing between oft-mentioned mountains. A drying process follows, concluding the next year, "in the second month, on the twenty-seventh day." This climatic anomaly wipes out all land-dwelling creatures except Noah, his seven relatives, and the animals aboard the ark.

The text omits when this flood struck Earth. Could a deluge of biblical scale have occurred? Uncertainty persists about where Noah lived before the catastrophe and in what era.

We previously suggested Cain migrated to the Kermanshah Valley during global warming around 11,700 years ago (9750 BCE). A brief cooling, the Preboreal Oscillation, lasting 200–250 years, followed, ending around 11,270 ± 30 years ago (9270 ± 30 BCE) with a rapid 4 ± 1.5°C temperature rise. This shift to warm, wet conditions between 11,270 and 11,210 years ago spurred forest growth in modern-day Netherlands and the Baltic Sea region. In southwest Europe, regional coolness 11,270 years ago gave way to aridity, favoring xerophytes and conifers. Around 11,200 years ago, Latvian lakes saw increased organic deposition due to thriving diatoms and woody debris. Norway’s Barents Sea coast experienced a two-phase warming, peaking around 11,200 years ago, fostering continuous vegetation. By 11,150 years ago, northern Europe’s mild climate melted terrestrial ice sheets. In North America, lake ecosystems flourished 11,700 ± 70 and 11,150 ± 70 years ago, rapidly processing organic matter. Concurrently, the global ocean level rose in two stages due to freshwater influx, with sea levels climbing up to 250 centimeters per century between 11,500 and 8800 years ago. These observations lead us to hypothesize that a swift climatic anomaly—global warming around 11,270 years ago—underlies the biblical flood narrative.

Genesis states the flood began when Noah was 600 years old, "in the second month, on the seventeenth day," and ended "in the six hundred and first year, on the first day of the first month." Yet, the era remains unspecified. The Book of Jubilees, written between 153–105 BCE, offers a clue, stating the flood started in the twenty-seventh jubilee, fifth week, seventh year, and ended the following year, with Noah opening the ark’s hatch on the second month, twenty-seventh day, of the eighth year—dated as 1317 years from creation. Converted from the Hebrew to the Gregorian calendar, this places the flood’s onset on April 11, 2445 BCE, concluding May 9, 2443 BCE.

Using these dates, the disaster struck 4,470 years ago from 2025. However, the third millennium BCE saw uninterrupted human progress, with no record of a global flood. Ancient urban civilizations note population growth in Asia, North Africa, and likely worldwide. Earth’s five mass extinctions, the largest 251 million years ago, killed 90% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate families—long before humans existed, primarily affecting oceans, unlike Noah’s flood, which spared marine life.

Scholars observe that Genesis’s flood account draws from two hypothetical Judean sources: the "J source" (828–722 BCE) and the "P source" (715–687 BCE, possibly post-586 BCE). Both describe a planetary catastrophe, with waters covering "all high mountains."

Earth’s highest peak, Sagarmatha (Everest, 27°59'18"N, 86°55'30"E), stands at 8,848 meters. Per Genesis, ocean depth reached this height along current coastlines, rising "fifteen cubits" higher after forty days. Assuming a cubit equals roughly 0.5 meters, the flood’s surface hit 8,855.5 meters above today’s sea level.

Earth’s water resides in the mantle, atmosphere, oceans, lakes, rivers, snow, ice, aquifers, permafrost, compounds, and organisms, accumulating over 4,406 million years. Total volume is approximately 1.386 billion cubic kilometers, against Earth’s 1,083.21 billion cubic kilometer volume and 5.972 sextillion kilogram mass. The planet’s interior, at 410 kilometers deep, reaches 1,920°K (1,646.85°C) and 13.5 GPa, precluding vast liquid reservoirs underground.

The global ocean averages 3,682.2 meters deep, covering 361.84 million square kilometers, with a 1.3324 billion cubic kilometer volume. Mantle water, bound in minerals or melts, could form an 800-meter layer if released from 400–670 kilometers deep. The mantle’s transition zone holds 1–2% water by mass, with Earth’s non-core water equating to 2.6–8.3 oceans, though estimates range from 2.8 to 98.8, with 17.6 deemed reasonable.

Earth’s mean radius is 6,371 kilometers, increasing to 6,379.848 kilometers at Everest during the flood, assuming waters rose fifteen cubits above peaks. Covering Everest would require roughly 4.519 trillion cubic kilometers of water—over half Pluto’s 7.02 billion cubic kilometer volume. Mantle minerals could theoretically supply and reabsorb this volume, with Earth’s crust potentially redistributing it into cavities.

Some researchers suggest water arrived via carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, yet Genesis mentions no cosmic bombardment, only rain and the "great deep." Reasonably, adding 4.52 trillion cubic kilometers in forty days is implausible—equating to 221,200 millimeters per square meter daily (153,611.1 liters per minute, or 2.56 cubic meters per second). Norway’s Mardalsfossen waterfall (88 cubic feet per second) or India’s Nohkalikai (100 cubic feet per second) illustrate such flow.

Genesis notes the rains stopped after 150 days, and waters "went from the earth," draining and evaporating. Seven months later, mountain peaks emerged, and the ground dried. At 30°C, with strong airflow, 1.664 kilograms of water evaporates hourly per square meter. Over Earth’s 510 trillion square meter surface, 7,435 quintillion kilograms could vaporize yearly. The flood’s 4.519 trillion cubic meter volume, at 997 kilograms per cubic meter, weighs 4.506 quintillion kilograms. At this evaporation rate, without further rain, it would take 1,650.1 years to dissipate, assuming it escapes Earth’s gravity. Noah, living 950 years, wouldn’t witness the end. Did the author inflate his age to match the catastrophe’s scale?

Heating could hasten drying but would render water uninhabitable by denaturing proteins and depleting oxygen. Genesis confirms marine life survived, with only terrestrial creatures perishing. Rapid chemical binding of water into compounds, turning Earth into a chemical vat, isn’t considered.

These arguments suggest the flood was local, not global. Genesis exaggerates a hydrological disaster, typical of folk epics, likely recalling a tragic valley inundation in mountains, not a plain like Mesopotamia’s. This offers the most plausible explanation.

The text implies the flood began gradually, escalating with forty days of ceaseless rain. We propose initial water came from melting mountain snow and ice, followed by rainfall. Heavy precipitation often accompanies warming, especially near cyclone centers, though cold-sector rains are brief. We hypothesize the flood unfolded in mountains, repeatedly mentioned in Genesis. A "wind" heralds the disaster’s end, suggesting typical weather shifts and moisture-laden air movement. The flood level rises 150 days post-rain, explained by melting snowpacks, emptying highland lakes, and draining slope soils.

The author places the catastrophe among ridges, likely with perennial snows and glaciers. Only sustained warming could supply meltwater alongside rain, flowing downhill. The flood doesn’t end abruptly but recedes over six months, draining "back" naturally, not vanishing miraculously.

We propose the flood occurred in a Zagros basin west of the Iranian Plateau, where landslides or rockfalls blocked drainage. Gradual erosion of this natural dam allowed outflow, followed by spontaneous drying. Genesis suggests no mystical forces; high temperatures and vapor transport, driven by wind, dried the land. A mild climate emerged, evidenced by Noah’s post-flood vineyard—absent in "pre-flood" narratives. Ancient grape seeds, found in India (66 million years) and Colombia (60 million years), predate this.

Noah, who saved his family via the ark, remains enigmatic—his time, place, and prototype unclear. As Cain’s descendant, he likely lived in the same region. We suggest Cain migrated to the Zagros’s Kermanshah Valley (34°19'26"N, 47°04'25"E) before the 11,700-year-ago warming, with Noah born near the Preboreal Oscillation’s end (11,270 years ago). Today, Kermanshah is Iran’s agricultural hub, with warm summers, snowy winters, and diverse flora and fauna, once spanning 800,000 hectares of forest.

We believe a flood in this valley inspired Genesis’s tale, supported by the text’s focus on mountains. Noah’s use of "pitch" (bitumen, a mountain-derived oil byproduct) for the ark reinforces this. Genesis mentions "pitch pits" near mountains, used also for baby Moses’s basket. Sumerians employed bitumen from 3800–2500 BCE for adhesives, waterproofing, and masonry, while hominids in Syria used it 80,000–50,000 years ago for toolmaking.

Kermanshah lies at 1,350–1,392 meters elevation, its valley stretching northwest to southeast between Zagros ridges. The Gharehsoo River crosses it, feeding the Karkheh basin (50,000 square kilometers). Nearby valleys include Mahidasht (with Halashi, Robat, Kuzaran, Ravansar), Sahneh, and Mianrahan-Kamyaran (with Kamyaran). Javanrud thrives northwest, near Ban Galan valley.

Gharehsoo’s tributaries drain Ban Galan’s north, while its south feeds streams like Rudkhaneh-ye Hivas and Ab-i Marik, irrigating Mahidasht. Gharehsoo merges with the Raz Avar stream near Kermanshah, flowing southeast. At Tangeh-ye Do Ab (1,246 meters, 34°10'38"N, 47°20'46"E), it joins the Gamasiab, whose sources lie in highland valleys like Sib Anar (1,900 meters). Their confluence forms the Seymare, cutting a canyon through the Zagros, merging with the Zal to create the Karkheh, feeding the Hawizeh Marshes.

Gharehsoo’s 211-kilometer basin covers 5,793 square kilometers, 48% mountainous (up to 3,351 meters), 52% hills and plains (minimum 1,300 meters). Gamasiab’s 900-kilometer basin spans 11,040 square kilometers, with elevations from 1,275 to 3,680 meters. Together, their 16,833-square-kilometer watershed feeds the Seymare. If blocked, this could flood Kermanshah, Mahidasht, Sahneh, and Mianrahan-Kamyaran, with the lowest point at Cham-e Heydar (1,242 meters). Water reaching 1,409 meters could spill east toward Do Ab, or, at 1,430–1,440 meters, north via Ban Galan into the Sirwan, a Tigris tributary. This region, our "Land of Nod," encompasses these valleys and plains.

A second condition for flooding—beyond a Seymare blockage—is excessive inflow outpacing evaporation and filtration, causing severe inundation on the Gamasiab and Gharehsoo. For local flora and fauna, with mudslides and rockfalls, this would indeed be a "biblical flood."

While a global flood is theoretically possible, Earth’s water could cover all land, but preserving terrestrial life under such conditions defies geophysics and biochemistry. No material evidence supports a global catastrophe, and human populations never dwindled to eight individuals. Mass extinctions predate Homo sapiens.

We propose the flood legend stems from a real, large-scale inundation in a Zagros basin, likely Kermanshah and adjacent plains, corroborated by regional topography and drainage patterns. Genesis’s vaguer account targets a less educated audience, framing a natural disaster east of Mesopotamia, likely in the Zagros or Iranian Plateau. The tale, passed through generations, was exaggerated to cosmic proportions, as folklore often is.

Genesis reflects a scientific polish on a folk narrative, hinting at a brilliant consultant behind the text. This unknown scholar intuited Earth’s capacity to absorb vast water volumes, calling its depths the "abyss"—a term from Egyptian mythology, alongside sky, land, and sea, created by Ptah. The author grasps gravity’s role, noting water "went back" (draining and seeping), and the hydrological cycle, using "returning." Evaporation is distinguished as "the earth dried." Such phrases, with the 150-day flooding and ten-month drying timeline, lend credibility, though the era remains elusive, complicated by millennia-old intentional edits.

This effort to convey the catastrophe’s scale scientifically reveals an ancient polymath, versed in geography, locating Eden and Nod near Assyria, Arabia, and possibly the Hindu Kush (Kush) and Indus River (Gihon). This savant, perhaps widely traveled or highly educated, mastered agriculture, economics, botany, zoology, metallurgy, music, medicine, pottery, and warfare. Such erudition suggests a high-ranking figure, not a tribal chief but a leader in a civilized state. Dating the flood narrative’s creation could clarify where Genesis’s concept emerged. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

1531SteucoA

   Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text (in  Latin) [iii]   English translation [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Fragments from the book: Steuco A . Augustini Steuchi Eugubini Veteris Testamenti ad ueritatem Hebraicam recognitio (1531). The author discusses the term ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in the book of Genesis and notes that this structure serves a supporting and motor function and, when injured, causes lameness. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 1531SteucoA . [ii]   Original text (in   Latin) Quote p. 308 Tetigit neruum fœmoris כַּף יְרֵבוּ id est Latitudinem coxæ asseruntqs. Hebræi significare hoc loco latum os coxæ: ut ab Auen Esdra quoqs annotatu est : in ea parte neruus coxæ est : at qs hoc est quòd post neruū arefactum claudicabat Iacob. Nõ enim neruus hoc loco, membrű genitale significat: q...

1155Abenezra

  Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   English translation [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Fragment from the book: Ezra AM. Ibn Ezra’s Commentary on the Pentateuch. Genesis (Bereshit) (1155). The author discusses the interpretation of the term gid ha-nasheh denoting ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in the book of Bereshit. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 1155Abenezra . [ii]   Original text Bereshit 32:33 ( sefaria.org )   [iii]   English translation Genesis 32:33 THE SINEW OF THE THIGH-VEIN. The meaning of the term gid ha-nasheh (the sinew of the thigh-vein) is known from the tradition received and transmitted to us by the Talmudic sages.49 No one but those lacking in understanding and knowledge of nature have any doubt as to its definition. The latter interpret gid (sinew) to refer to the penis and h...

LCF in 2026 (April)

  LCF in 2026 ( April )  (Quotes from articles and books published in  April  2026 mentioning the ligamentum capitis   femoris)     Kamakura, F., Tsuzaki, Y., Matsushita, T., Ishigaki, Y., & Yasuda, G. (2026). A Rare Case of Adult Non-traumatic Recurrent Anterior Hip Joint Dislocation. Cureus , 18 (4).  [i]   сureus.com , assets.cureus.com/pdf Canata, G. L., Casale, V., & Ioppolo, M. (2026). Dance. In   Injury Prevention and Care in Artistic Sports   (pp. 33-42). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.     [ii]     link.springer.com   Tekmen, E., Sever, S. N., Cirak, M. T., Golpinar, M., Canbeyli, I. D., & Turhan, B. (2026). Perspectivas Morfométricas y Morfológicas Basadas en el Sexo de la Cabeza Ósea Femoral y de la Fóvea de la Cabeza Ósea Femoral.   International Journal of Morphology ,   44 (1), 276-282.    [iii]     scielo.cl   ,    scielo.cl/pdf ...

THE TRUTH INJECTION

  The "Truth Injection" Impact on AI and 4 Billion People: Informed Insight or AI Hallucination? Sergey V. Arkhipov & Google Gemini   CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   A Briefe Backstory [iii]   Interview [iv]   References [v]   Application [i]   Abstract While examining modern biblical criticism, I engaged in a discussion with Artificial Intelligence regarding my book,  “ 50 Tables of Evidence for the Composition of Genesis in Late Second Intermediate Period Egypt ” . The machine’s apocalyptic prediction concerning half of the world's population and the evolution of computer technology left me puzzled. To verify this prophecy and seek counsel from "natural intelligence," I am publishing my conversation with the AI. This may be of interest to others, as will response to the machine’s final last question regarding religious worldview: «Now that the "antidote" is in your system, do you feel more prepared to face a world without a "sacred" fou...

NEWS 2026

New publications of our resource   in 2026 The initial phase of collecting data on LCF, accumulated prior to the 20th century, is largely complete. Next, we plan to analyze and synthesize thematic information, adding data from the 20th and 21st centuries. The work will focus primarily on: prevention, diagnosis, arthroscopy, plastic surgery, and endoprosthetics.  May 11 , 2026  THE TRUTH INJECTION .   Interview with Artificial Intelligence (Google Gemini model). Topic:  Critique of the Pentateuch. May 5 , 2026 1155Abenezra The author discusses the interpretation of the term gid ha-nasheh denoting LCF in the book of Bereshit.   1531SteucoA  The author discusses the term LCF in the book of Genesis and notes that this structure serves a supporting and m otor function and, when injured, causes lameness May 1 , 2026 LCF in 2026 (April) .  Quotes from articl es and books published in April   2026 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris....

Online Journal «ABOUT ROUND LIGAMENT OF FEMUR», April 2026

The journal is dedicated to the  ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF)  and related topics   About the Journal   »»»                                                                                . The online journal  « About Round Ligament of  Femur »   was created based on the scientific blog of the same name. The resource is the English-language part of the project:  ONLINE JOURNAL:  Ligamentum capitis femoris .   Updates:  As new materials are prepared. Mission :   Popularization and preservation of knowledge about LCF, as well as promoting its practical application. Main goal:  Improvement of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries and diseases of the hip joint. Publisher:  Arkhipov S.V., independent re...

BLOG CONTENT

  T he ligament of the head of femur or ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) is the key to a graceful gait and understanding the causes of hip joint diseases. We present promising scientific knowledge necessary for preserving health,  to create new implants and techniques  of treating degenerative  pathology and damage of the hip joint. Project objective : preserving a normal gait and quality of life, helping to study of hip joint biomechanics, developing effective treatments for its diseases and injuries. In translating to English, the author is assisted by ChatGPT (version 3.5)  and the Google Translate service .  We're sorry for any flaws in the syntax. The meaning makes up for the imperfections!     TABLES OF CONTENTS    Acetabular Canal   (Anatomy, topography and significance of the functioning area of ​​the ligamentum capitis femoris) Acetabular Canal.  Part 1.   This article describes the space where the ligam...

2024MiglioriniF_MaffulliN

   Abstract and table 4 ( overview of LCF tear classification ) of the article Migliorini F et al. The ligamentum teres and its role in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.  (2024). Translation into Russian is available at the link: 2024MiglioriniF_MaffulliN . Systematic Review / Open access / Published: 20 December 2024 The ligamentum teres and its role in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review Filippo Migliorini, Federico Cocconi, Tommaso Bardazzi, Virginia Masoni, Virginia Gardino, Gennaro Pipino, Nicola Maffulli  Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology  volume 25, Article number: 68 (2024)    Abstract Background The ligamentum teres (LT) has received attention in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Indeed, a better understanding of the function of the LT and its implications for cli...

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

Key Role of the LCF

  In the experiments conducted on the pelvis-femur-muscle-ligaments model, we found that when the contralateral pelvic drop occurs, the ligament of the head of femur become maximally tense; simultaneously, there is relaxation and lengthening of the gluteus medius muscle; the pelvis spontaneously rotates towards the stance limb (forward), and the load on the hip joint decreases. Thanks to the functioning of the ligament of the head of femur the walking is smooth, rhythmic, and energy-efficient. Track Music:  Blue Dot Sessions , Vittoro (CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED / fragment)  "Take care of the ligament of the head of femur for yourself and your neighbor!" .                                                                       . keywords: ligamentum capitis femoris, ligament of head of femur, ligamentum te...