Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 3


Short retelling of chapter 3 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 3. THE DAWN OF SURGERY

The animal kingdom exhibits numerous forms of social support, many of which lay the groundwork for rudimentary medical practices. Insects like bees, fish such as cichlids, amphibians like bullfrogs, reptiles like crocodiles, and most birds and mammals demonstrate care for their offspring. Lions and wolves feed injured kin, while buffalo and flocking birds collectively defend against predators. Marine mammals assist struggling companions to the surface for air, and elephants help free trapped herd members from mud or aid them in standing. These behaviors hint at the origins of altruism, a trait that extends to early medical instincts.

Animals also engage in self-medication and basic healing. Birds employ various techniques to combat ectoparasites, while moths, ants, and fruit flies consume natural remedies for ailments. Chimpanzees incorporate medicinal plants into their diets, using them passively as healing foods or actively to treat injuries and infections. Dogs instinctively immobilize fractured limbs, lick wounds to clean them, and seek anti-parasitic plants when infested with worms. Grooming among related animals or mutual parasite removal across species serves as a form of treatment. A striking example involves a male Sumatran orangutan who applied sap and a paste made from Fibraurea tinctoria leaves to a facial wound, protecting it from insects while the lysozyme in his saliva and the plant’s compounds prevented infection and promoted healing. Chimpanzee communities lick each other’s wounds and place insects into injuries, possibly for therapeutic purposes. Capuchin monkeys rub odorous substances on one another, likely as a mutual anti-parasitic treatment. Ants clean and disinfect wounds with antimicrobial saliva, immobilize partially severed limbs, and even amputate damaged legs to reduce infection risks, a behavior that mirrors human altruism despite being driven by the need to remove dead tissue.

Humanity’s need for healthcare dates back to prehistory, with urgent surgery emerging as a critical skill. Early humans faced injuries from extreme temperatures, rugged terrain, falls from trees or cliffs, rockslides, predator attacks, and conflicts with rival groups. Burns, frostbite, cuts, muscle tears, fractures, and dislocations were common, yet not always fatal. Non-vital organs like eyes, ears, or extremities were frequently affected, prompting attempts at self-diagnosis and self-treatment for minor issues such as bruises, abrasions, small wounds, foreign bodies, sprains, ligament tears, subluxations, and hairline fractures. These efforts mark the roots of surgical specialties, including traumatology, burn care, ophthalmology, vascular surgery, maxillofacial surgery, abdominal surgery, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology.

The earliest recorded lethal injury among human ancestors is that of “Lucy,” a female Australopithecus afarensis who lived in Ethiopia around 3.2 million years ago. Her remains reveal death from multiple fractures, internal ruptures, and hemorrhages caused by a fall, likely from a tree. Such injuries were not uncommon among early hominins, whether fruit-gatherers or mountain-dwellers. For instance, two Australopithecus sediba individuals suffered fatal trauma after falling into a 5–10-meter-deep cave in South Africa’s Malapa site about 2 million years ago. Falls from heights exceeding 6.61 meters often cause severe head, chest, or abdominal injuries, offering little chance of survival for these early hominins.

Many injuries, however, were survivable, with some healing spontaneously. A healed heel bone fracture in an Australopithecus africanus, found in South Africa’s Sterkfontein Caves (dated 2.8–2.01 million years ago), suggests prolonged care by group members. The individual required immobilization for months, likely supported by a makeshift splint crafted from bark, vines, and sticks, and relied on others for food and mobility. This case highlights early social support and basic medical intervention, akin to modern orthopedic immobilization, though without advanced tools like plaster casts or surgical fixation.

Another example comes from Java, where a Homo erectus femur, dated 540,000–430,000 years ago, shows a massive ossification at the attachment site of the adductor brevis muscle. This likely resulted from a hematoma or chronic microtears, causing pain and limited mobility. The individual, unable to hunt or climb effectively, probably depended on group support and sought natural pain relief, as evidenced by the years-long growth of the osteophyte.

Homo heidelbergensis fossils also indicate care for the injured. A teenager from Italy’s Venosa-Notarchirico site (661,000–614,000 years ago) survived chronic femoral inflammation for over four months, implying community aid. In Spain’s Sima de los Huesos (530,000 years ago), a child’s skull with craniosynostosis and an elderly individual’s deformed pelvis and spine suggest they were cared for despite severe disabilities, as their conditions limited hunting or mobility.

Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), thriving 500,000–30,000 years ago, exhibited profound care for vulnerable group members, including children with severe pathologies. Their medicine was sophisticated, reducing mortality and enhancing adaptability, which supported their dispersal and evolution. Most Neanderthals sustained serious injuries, with 79–94% of populations affected, 37–52% experiencing severe trauma, and 13–19% disabled before adulthood. At Iraq’s Shanidar Cave (55,000–45,000 years ago), fossils reveal extensive care. Shanidar 1, a male, survived multiple fractures, orbital damage, and a partial arm amputation—possibly intentional—for over a decade, reaching old age with debilitating conditions. Shanidar 3’s rib shows a wound from a thrown weapon, while Shanidar 4 and 5 healed from rib and cranial injuries, respectively.

A young Neanderthal from France’s La Roche à Pierrot (36,000 years ago) recovered from skull fractures without infection, despite likely brain trauma and symptoms like pain, nausea, and disorientation requiring weeks of care. This suggests Neanderthals developed surgical skills, at least for treating skin and bone injuries. Dental tartar analysis from Spain’s El Sidrón cave reveals Neanderthals consumed medicinal plants like yarrow and chamomile, as well as penicillin-producing fungi and poplar, which contains salicylic acid, a natural pain reliever. These plants offered anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and sedative effects, likely used to treat wounds and reduce infections.

Neanderthals gained anatomical knowledge by butchering hunted animals, applying insights to human bodies. At Shanidar, an amputation may have been performed to remove a non-viable arm, possibly crushed by falling rock. The procedure likely involved cutting through dead tissue below a fracture to minimize pain and blood loss, using stone or bone tools and possibly plant-based analgesics. Post-operative care included cleaning the wound, applying raw meat or moss dressings, and using honey or herbs for healing, sustaining the patient for weeks.

Neanderthal medicine, possibly pioneered by a skilled individual at Shanidar, reflects advanced social and intellectual capacities. Their care for the injured, like Shanidar 1, who lived to 35–50 despite disabilities, underscores their humanism. Compared to early Homo sapiens, who averaged 30–39 years, Neanderthals’ medical practices extended lifespans, preserving valuable knowledge.

The earliest confirmed surgery on modern humans—an amputation of a man’s lower leg—occurred 31,000–30,000 years ago on Borneo’s Liang Tebo site. Other evidence includes trepanned skulls from Morocco (13,000–11,000 years ago), Iraq (8,920 years ago), and Ukraine (8,020–4,783 years ago), as well as dental drilling in Pakistan (9,000–7,500 years ago) and Italy (14,160–13,820 years ago). Amputations and mastoidectomies appear in Europe by 5,500–4,500 years ago, often with signs of healing, indicating surgical proficiency.

Surgery arose from anatomical knowledge gained through palpation, wound inspection, and rituals like cannibalism and mummification. In Spain’s Gran Dolina (780,000 years ago), Homo antecessor remains suggest marrow extraction, while cannibalism persisted in Europe (23,500–13,500 years ago) and China (8,000–4,500 years ago). Chile’s Chinchorro culture (8,475–1,720 years ago) mastered mummification, revealing detailed anatomical understanding, though its application to medicine is unclear.

Mesopotamian medicine, emerging in Sumer by 4,000 BCE, evolved through Akkad, Babylon, and Assyria. Military doctors likely served in garrisons, and hospitals existed by 2,000 BCE. Sumerian medicine, initially empirical, grew mystical by 1,700 BCE. The physician Lulu practiced in Ur around 2,700 BCE, and surgical tools like bronze knives were used by 2,500 BCE. Procedures included wound cleaning, cauterization, and abscess drainage, but Hammurabi’s Code (circa 1,760 BCE) imposed harsh penalties for surgical errors, stifling progress.

Egyptian medicine, dating to 3,300 BCE, blended science with religion. By 2,750 BCE, surgical procedures like bone setting and circumcision were depicted, with metastases treated by 2,400 BCE. Operations peaked in the Old Kingdom (2,613–2,181 BCE) but declined later due to religious taboos against dissection. Mummification provided anatomical insights, yet these were underutilized. Notable figures like Hesy Re, a dentist under Djoser (2,630–2,611 BCE), highlight Egypt’s specialized medical roles.

In the Levant, Israelite medicine lagged, dominated by priests who prioritized ritual over science. Surgeons performed circumcisions and basic procedures, but prohibitions on dissection limited advancements until the Hellenistic period. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LCF in 2025 (September)

  LCF in 2025 ( September )   (Quotes from articles and books published in  September  2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris)   Zhang, Z., Dong, Q., Wang, T., You, H., & Wang, X. (2025). Redescription of the osteology and systematic of Panguraptor lufengensis (Neo-theropoda: Coelophysoidea).   01 September 2025. PREPRINT (Version 1)  [i]   researchsquare.com   Tripathy, S. K., Khan, S., & Bhagat, A. (2025). Surgical Anatomy of the Femoral Head. In A Practical Guide to Management of Femoral Head Fracture-Dislocation (pp. 1-13). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.   [ii]   link.springer.com   Yoon, B. H., Kim, H. S., Lim, Y. W., & Lim, S. J. (2025). Adhesive Capsulitis of the Hip: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Hip & pelvis , 37 (3), 171-177.    [iii]    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov      Bharath, C. M., Aswath, C. A., Ayyadurai, P., Srinivasan, P....

0cent.4Q158.1-2

  Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   Translation [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Fragments 1-2 of Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158.1-2, which previously contained part of Genesis 32 with a mention of ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). We have translated the reconstructed text of M.M. Zahn (2009). The English translation is available at: 0 cent .4 Q 158.1-2 . [ii]   Original text Photocopy   Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158, fragments 1-2 (Plate 138, Frag. 4 B-358482), material – parchment, text – Hebrew, period – Herodian. A screenshot of the original from The Leon Levy dead sea scrolls Digital Library collection, © 2025 Israel Antiquities Authority  deadseascrolls.org.il   (Fair use for criticism, study and comparison; sharpening, color correction, and captions done by us.).   Transcription Dead Sea Scroll 4Q158, fragments 1-2, lines 11...

EXTERNAL LIGAMENTS & LCF

  external ligaments & LCF First experiments to study the interaction of the external ligaments and the ligamentum capitis femoris in a model: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_6.html Pathological consequences of lengthening of the ligamentum capitis femoris: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_63.html   norm: https://kruglayasvyazka.blogspot.com/2024/06/blog-post_50.html   #ligamentum_teres   #ligamentum_capitis_femoris   #hip   #biomechanics    Publication in the facebook group 03/27/2025.                                                                                                                     BLOG CONTE...

1802PalmeraniÁ

   Palmerani Á , drawing Jacob wrestling with the angel (1802 ).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not prevail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Ángel  Palmerani  – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel  ( 1802); original in the  a...

1971CracraftJ

   Content [i]   Annotaction [ii]   Original in  English [iii]   Illustrations [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotaction F ragment s of the article: Cracraft J. The functional morphology of the hind limb of the domestic pigeon, Columba livia. (1971). The author studied the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in the pigeon. Its strength is noted and its attachment areas and biomechanics are described. The LCF functions in conjunction with the posterior acetabular ligament. Translation into Russian is available at the link: 1971CracraftJ .  [ii]   Original in  English Quote, p. 182 TERES LIGAMENT The teres ligament (ter lig; fig. 2) arises from the dorsal portion of the head of the femur (fovea capitis; see Stolpe, 1932, p.165 ). A short and broad ligament, it curves ventromedially to the anteroventral edge of the inner opening of the acetabu...

1980WalkerJM

   Content [i]   Annotation [ii]   Original text [iii]   Illustrations [iv]   Source  &  links [v]   Notes [vi]   Authors & Affiliations [vii]   Keywords [i]   Annotation Article : Walker JM. Growth characteristics of the fetal ligament of the head of femur: significance in congenital hip disease (1980). The author discusses the embryonic development and size of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) in normal and dysplastic hips. The text in Russian is available at the following link: 1980WalkerJM . [ii]   Original text Growth Characteristics of the Fetal Ligament of the Head of Femur: Significance in congenital hip disease   J.M. WALKER, Ph.D.   Abstract   Measurement of the length and width of the ligament of the head of femur (ligamentum teres) in 140 normal human fetuses between 12 weeks and term provides limits for growth changes in this structure. These observations provide no morphological evid...

1910SuttonHA_DrinkerCK

  Fragments from the book Sutton HA, Drinker CK. Osteology and syndesmology (1910). The selected fragments discuss the anatomy and topography of the ligament of the femoral head (LCF). According to the authors, this structure has low strength, but Galen of Pergamon (2-3rd cent.) described it as «the strongest» ( 1829KühnCG ). [Eng] Quote 1. p. 76 . The Cotyloid Lig't., or Cartilage, surmounts the edge of the Acetabulum except where it is broken by the Notch. This ligament simply deepens the cavity. The centre of the Acetabulum, by a rough area, the Cotyloid Fossa, attaches the Ligamentum Teres. Quote 2. p. 79. Head. Slightly more than a half sphere in shape. An articular surface for the Acetabulum occupies it, except at a fossa which attaches the Ligamentum Teres. Quote 3. p. 86. Two connect the bones. They are: 1. Ligamentum Teres: — Weak. Passes between the centre of the Acetabulum and the oval fossa upon the Head of the Femur. It lies outside the synovial membrane. External link...

1541MondinoL_DryanderJ

  Fragment from the book Mondino de Luzzi, Dryander J. Anatomia Mundini (1541). An early description of the anatomy and role of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) is presented. The pathogenesis of lameness and soft tissue atrophy in LCF pathology is discussed. For more details, see the commentary in  1541MondinoL_DryanderJ [Rus] .  Quote p. 62. [Lat] De anatomia cruris [&] pedis. Postea eleua musculos & chordas &, uide ossa. Et primura est os foemoris supra quod fabricatae sunt spondiles dorsi: & per consequens totum corpus in parte inferiori habet pixidem quondam, in cuius concauitate locata est extremitas rotunda canna coxae, que uocatur uertebrum. Et in medio amborum in parte anteriori est quod dam ligamentum, quod aliomodo porestuocari uertebrum: & quando hoc uel primum resilit foras: tunc niecesse ed hominem claudicare, quia crus hic elongatur & firmari non potest; & totum non bene potest supportari: & necesse eit etiam ut crus tab...

18c.Augsburg

  Painting on glass from Augsburg – Jacob wrestling with the angel (18 cent.).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not prevail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Author unknown, painting on the reverse of glass from Augsburg – Jacob wrestling with the a...

1873MeyerGH

  Professor  Georg Hermann von Mayer discovered a pressure mark from the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) on the head of the femur. In the fragment presented to your attention, the author points out that the named depression indicates the tension of the LCF in the position of flexion and external rotation of the hip. This idea of Mayer was later repeatedly cited, see, for example, the work of Hermann Welcker  " Ueber das Hüftgelenk, nebst einigen Bemerkungenüber Gelenke überhaupt, insbesondere über das Schultergelenk " (1876). von Meyer GH. Die Statik und Mechanik des menschlichen Knochengerüstes. Edited, Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann; 1873. [fragment] Quote pp. 342-344   Neben der Gelenkkapsel befindet sich in dem Hüftgelenke noch ein eigenthümlicher Bandapparat, das ligamentum teres, über dessen Bedeutung sehr verschiedene Auffassung gefunden wird. Von der einen Seite wird ihm nämlich entschieden ...