Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 3


Short retelling of chapter 3 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 3. THE DAWN OF SURGERY

The animal kingdom exhibits numerous forms of social support, many of which lay the groundwork for rudimentary medical practices. Insects like bees, fish such as cichlids, amphibians like bullfrogs, reptiles like crocodiles, and most birds and mammals demonstrate care for their offspring. Lions and wolves feed injured kin, while buffalo and flocking birds collectively defend against predators. Marine mammals assist struggling companions to the surface for air, and elephants help free trapped herd members from mud or aid them in standing. These behaviors hint at the origins of altruism, a trait that extends to early medical instincts.

Animals also engage in self-medication and basic healing. Birds employ various techniques to combat ectoparasites, while moths, ants, and fruit flies consume natural remedies for ailments. Chimpanzees incorporate medicinal plants into their diets, using them passively as healing foods or actively to treat injuries and infections. Dogs instinctively immobilize fractured limbs, lick wounds to clean them, and seek anti-parasitic plants when infested with worms. Grooming among related animals or mutual parasite removal across species serves as a form of treatment. A striking example involves a male Sumatran orangutan who applied sap and a paste made from Fibraurea tinctoria leaves to a facial wound, protecting it from insects while the lysozyme in his saliva and the plant’s compounds prevented infection and promoted healing. Chimpanzee communities lick each other’s wounds and place insects into injuries, possibly for therapeutic purposes. Capuchin monkeys rub odorous substances on one another, likely as a mutual anti-parasitic treatment. Ants clean and disinfect wounds with antimicrobial saliva, immobilize partially severed limbs, and even amputate damaged legs to reduce infection risks, a behavior that mirrors human altruism despite being driven by the need to remove dead tissue.

Humanity’s need for healthcare dates back to prehistory, with urgent surgery emerging as a critical skill. Early humans faced injuries from extreme temperatures, rugged terrain, falls from trees or cliffs, rockslides, predator attacks, and conflicts with rival groups. Burns, frostbite, cuts, muscle tears, fractures, and dislocations were common, yet not always fatal. Non-vital organs like eyes, ears, or extremities were frequently affected, prompting attempts at self-diagnosis and self-treatment for minor issues such as bruises, abrasions, small wounds, foreign bodies, sprains, ligament tears, subluxations, and hairline fractures. These efforts mark the roots of surgical specialties, including traumatology, burn care, ophthalmology, vascular surgery, maxillofacial surgery, abdominal surgery, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology.

The earliest recorded lethal injury among human ancestors is that of “Lucy,” a female Australopithecus afarensis who lived in Ethiopia around 3.2 million years ago. Her remains reveal death from multiple fractures, internal ruptures, and hemorrhages caused by a fall, likely from a tree. Such injuries were not uncommon among early hominins, whether fruit-gatherers or mountain-dwellers. For instance, two Australopithecus sediba individuals suffered fatal trauma after falling into a 5–10-meter-deep cave in South Africa’s Malapa site about 2 million years ago. Falls from heights exceeding 6.61 meters often cause severe head, chest, or abdominal injuries, offering little chance of survival for these early hominins.

Many injuries, however, were survivable, with some healing spontaneously. A healed heel bone fracture in an Australopithecus africanus, found in South Africa’s Sterkfontein Caves (dated 2.8–2.01 million years ago), suggests prolonged care by group members. The individual required immobilization for months, likely supported by a makeshift splint crafted from bark, vines, and sticks, and relied on others for food and mobility. This case highlights early social support and basic medical intervention, akin to modern orthopedic immobilization, though without advanced tools like plaster casts or surgical fixation.

Another example comes from Java, where a Homo erectus femur, dated 540,000–430,000 years ago, shows a massive ossification at the attachment site of the adductor brevis muscle. This likely resulted from a hematoma or chronic microtears, causing pain and limited mobility. The individual, unable to hunt or climb effectively, probably depended on group support and sought natural pain relief, as evidenced by the years-long growth of the osteophyte.

Homo heidelbergensis fossils also indicate care for the injured. A teenager from Italy’s Venosa-Notarchirico site (661,000–614,000 years ago) survived chronic femoral inflammation for over four months, implying community aid. In Spain’s Sima de los Huesos (530,000 years ago), a child’s skull with craniosynostosis and an elderly individual’s deformed pelvis and spine suggest they were cared for despite severe disabilities, as their conditions limited hunting or mobility.

Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), thriving 500,000–30,000 years ago, exhibited profound care for vulnerable group members, including children with severe pathologies. Their medicine was sophisticated, reducing mortality and enhancing adaptability, which supported their dispersal and evolution. Most Neanderthals sustained serious injuries, with 79–94% of populations affected, 37–52% experiencing severe trauma, and 13–19% disabled before adulthood. At Iraq’s Shanidar Cave (55,000–45,000 years ago), fossils reveal extensive care. Shanidar 1, a male, survived multiple fractures, orbital damage, and a partial arm amputation—possibly intentional—for over a decade, reaching old age with debilitating conditions. Shanidar 3’s rib shows a wound from a thrown weapon, while Shanidar 4 and 5 healed from rib and cranial injuries, respectively.

A young Neanderthal from France’s La Roche à Pierrot (36,000 years ago) recovered from skull fractures without infection, despite likely brain trauma and symptoms like pain, nausea, and disorientation requiring weeks of care. This suggests Neanderthals developed surgical skills, at least for treating skin and bone injuries. Dental tartar analysis from Spain’s El Sidrón cave reveals Neanderthals consumed medicinal plants like yarrow and chamomile, as well as penicillin-producing fungi and poplar, which contains salicylic acid, a natural pain reliever. These plants offered anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, and sedative effects, likely used to treat wounds and reduce infections.

Neanderthals gained anatomical knowledge by butchering hunted animals, applying insights to human bodies. At Shanidar, an amputation may have been performed to remove a non-viable arm, possibly crushed by falling rock. The procedure likely involved cutting through dead tissue below a fracture to minimize pain and blood loss, using stone or bone tools and possibly plant-based analgesics. Post-operative care included cleaning the wound, applying raw meat or moss dressings, and using honey or herbs for healing, sustaining the patient for weeks.

Neanderthal medicine, possibly pioneered by a skilled individual at Shanidar, reflects advanced social and intellectual capacities. Their care for the injured, like Shanidar 1, who lived to 35–50 despite disabilities, underscores their humanism. Compared to early Homo sapiens, who averaged 30–39 years, Neanderthals’ medical practices extended lifespans, preserving valuable knowledge.

The earliest confirmed surgery on modern humans—an amputation of a man’s lower leg—occurred 31,000–30,000 years ago on Borneo’s Liang Tebo site. Other evidence includes trepanned skulls from Morocco (13,000–11,000 years ago), Iraq (8,920 years ago), and Ukraine (8,020–4,783 years ago), as well as dental drilling in Pakistan (9,000–7,500 years ago) and Italy (14,160–13,820 years ago). Amputations and mastoidectomies appear in Europe by 5,500–4,500 years ago, often with signs of healing, indicating surgical proficiency.

Surgery arose from anatomical knowledge gained through palpation, wound inspection, and rituals like cannibalism and mummification. In Spain’s Gran Dolina (780,000 years ago), Homo antecessor remains suggest marrow extraction, while cannibalism persisted in Europe (23,500–13,500 years ago) and China (8,000–4,500 years ago). Chile’s Chinchorro culture (8,475–1,720 years ago) mastered mummification, revealing detailed anatomical understanding, though its application to medicine is unclear.

Mesopotamian medicine, emerging in Sumer by 4,000 BCE, evolved through Akkad, Babylon, and Assyria. Military doctors likely served in garrisons, and hospitals existed by 2,000 BCE. Sumerian medicine, initially empirical, grew mystical by 1,700 BCE. The physician Lulu practiced in Ur around 2,700 BCE, and surgical tools like bronze knives were used by 2,500 BCE. Procedures included wound cleaning, cauterization, and abscess drainage, but Hammurabi’s Code (circa 1,760 BCE) imposed harsh penalties for surgical errors, stifling progress.

Egyptian medicine, dating to 3,300 BCE, blended science with religion. By 2,750 BCE, surgical procedures like bone setting and circumcision were depicted, with metastases treated by 2,400 BCE. Operations peaked in the Old Kingdom (2,613–2,181 BCE) but declined later due to religious taboos against dissection. Mummification provided anatomical insights, yet these were underutilized. Notable figures like Hesy Re, a dentist under Djoser (2,630–2,611 BCE), highlight Egypt’s specialized medical roles.

In the Levant, Israelite medicine lagged, dominated by priests who prioritized ritual over science. Surgeons performed circumcisions and basic procedures, but prohibitions on dissection limited advancements until the Hellenistic period. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?

  Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?  A Medical Hypothesis By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD & Lyudmila N. Arkhipova, BSN     CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   Introduction [iii]   Egyptian physician [iv]   Asian diviner [v]   Conclusion [vi]   References [vii]   Application [i]   Abstract The Book of Genesis is an example of an ancient literary text that contains important medical insights. We propose that it was written in northern Egypt in the late 17th century BCE, approximately ten years after the Minoan eruption. The protograph likely emerged from the collaboration between an Asiatic seer, who rose to the rank of an Egyptian official, and an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist. By refining its dating and authorship, this hypothesis positions Genesis as a credible source of medical and historical data, thereby enhancing its value for interdisciplinary research. [ii]   Introduction According to Rabbinic Judais...

13c.Soligalich

   Soligalich , icon, Jacob wrestling with the angel ( 13 cent. ).   Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob wa s left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not pre vail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Soligalich  – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel ( 13 cent. ); original in the  leonovval...

CRITICAL MASS OF CONSENSUS

Online version from 07/03/2025   Critical mass of consensus:  Opinions on the importance of ligamentum capitis femoris (XX-XXI century) Arkhipov S . V. Content [i]   Abstract [ii]   Opinions [iii]   Authors & Affiliations [iv]   References [v]   Appendices [i]   Abstract This evolving article collects views on the importance of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) to the musculoskeletal system. Our collection aims to highlight the emerging fundamental shift in the current consensus in the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal research communities regarding the meaning of LCF. Here the convinced convince others. Ultimately, this once-unconventional idea will become established knowledge, enabling a transformation in clinicians’ thinking and in approaches to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hip joint pathologies. [ii]   Opinions   2025 «The LT [LCF] works as a secondary static stabilizer of the hip by acting as a sling to preven...

Main Scheme

  Interaction of ligaments of the hip joint and muscles during single-leg support  BLOG CONTENT IMAGES AND VIDEOS

LCF in 2025 (May)

  LCF in 2025 (May): Quotes from articles and books published in May 2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris. Teytelbaum, D. E., Bijanki, V., Samuel, S. P., Silva, S., Israel, H., & van Bosse, H. J. Does Open Reduction of Arthrogrypotic Hips Cause Stiffness?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics , 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002940  [i]   journals.lww.com   SANTORI, N., & TECCE, S. M. (2025). FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ARTHROSCOPY FOR HIP TRAUMA. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 136-143.  [ii]   books.google   RANDELLI, F. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC FREE-BODY REMOVAL AFTER DISLOCATION OR AFTER BULLET/BOMB. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 1-11.  [iii]   books.google   APRATO, A. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES FOR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE REDUCTION AND FIXATION. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 38.  [iv]   books.google   Brinkman, J. C., & Hartigan, D. E. (2025). Indications f...

INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY

  Combined PDF version of the article: Arkhipov SV. Arkhipov SV. Inferior Portal for Hip A rthroscopy: A Pilot Experimental Study. This page contains a photocopy of the publication. The links for downloading the PDF version and the addresses of the online versions are given below.  The original in Russian is available at the link: Нижний портал для артроскопии тазобедренного сустава . 

Inferior Portal. Part 2.

  Original in Russian is available at the link:  Нижний портал. Часть 2.  below is a machine translation edited by a non-native speaker.     INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY: A PILOT STUDY PART 2.  Inferior Portal Prototypes Arkhipov S.V., Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland   CONTENTS PART 1.  Background and Hypothesis [1] . Introduction [2] .  Passage through the Inferior Portal [3] .  Main Advantages of the Proposed Technique [4] .  Specific Risks of the Proposed Technique [5] .  Main Limitations of the Proposed Technique [6] . References (Part 1)   PART 2. Inferior Portal Prototypes [7] . Open Reduction [8] .  Puncture and Arthrography [9] . Arthroscopy and Debridement [10] . References (Part 2)   [7] . Open  R eduction   Our idea to reduce the trauma of hip joint surgery through an inferior approach has a rich history. In the spring of 1907, Professor Karl Rudolf Ludloff (1864-1945, photo )...

ARTICLE ANNOUNCEMENT: THE BOOK OF BERESHIT AS A GREAT COMPILATION

  Article Announcement: «The Book of Bereshit as a Great Compilation of Texts and Meanings from the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt: A Pilot Culturological, Medical, Archaeological, and Textological Examination of the Legends versus Traditional Attribution»   By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD  Joensuu, Finland   Abstract The Book of Bereshit (Genes is) was composed in Egypt during the 17th century BCE and reached its definitive protographic form following the Minoan eruption  of Thera . This study argues that the work was a collaborative effort between an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist and an outstanding scribe of Asiatic origin, operating within a sophisticated administrative and scientific framework. By analyzing anatomical descriptions, Bronze Age economic data, and climatic markers, this paper demonstrates that the text originated as a high-level socio-political commission within the Egyptian House of Life. Keywords Genesis Protograph, Bereshi...

LCF in 2026 (January)

  L CF in 2026 ( January )   (Quotes from articles and books published in  January  2026 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris)   Villegas Meza, A. D., Nocek, M., Felan, N. A., Speshock, A., Bolia, I. K., & Philippon, M. J. (2025). Hip Microinstability: Current Concepts in Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Outcomes A Narrative Review. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine , 205-221.   [i]   tandfonline.com   ,   dovepress.com   Wang, C. H., Wang, J. H., Lin, Y. H., Shih, C. A., & Hong, C. K. (2026). An Unusual Mechanical Cause of Hip Subluxation Following Modified Dunn Procedure for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Case Report. Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders , 10-4103.   [ii]     journals.lww.com   Alsaghaier, A. (2026). Results of spica cast in treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children between 6-18 Months. Journal of Academic Research , 30 , 28-43.   [...