Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 10

   

Short retelling of chapter 10 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 10. THE ARK AND THE CAVE

The Book of Genesis does not specify where Noah lived before the flood, but it is plausible his home was in the "land of Nod." To save his family and terrestrial animals, Noah builds an ark measuring "three hundred cubits" long, "fifty cubits" wide, and "thirty cubits" high, coated with pitch inside and out. The vessel has three decks, a pyramidal roof, a side door, and a window, likely at the top. Noah loads his wife, three sons with their wives, and representatives of birds, reptiles, and "clean and unclean cattle." The text lists some "passengers": Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and mentions "beasts," "cattle," "creeping things," "flying creatures," "birds," and "winged things." God instructs Noah to take seven pairs of "clean" animals and birds, and two pairs of "unclean" ones. The command is presumably followed exactly. The catastrophic flood wipes out all land vertebrates except those aboard the colossal ark and Noah’s eight-person family.

The flood narrative, with its tragic events, uplifting resolution, and moral lessons, feels coherent. However, inconsistencies arise. Before the flood, "God" limits human lifespan to 120 years, yet Noah lives to 950, outlasting Adam’s 930 years. Others, like Terah (205 years), Abraham (175), Isaac (180), and Jacob (147), also exceed this limit. In contrast, the longest verified modern human lifespan is 122.45 years.

During the voyage, Noah experiments to gauge receding water levels, starting forty days after the tenth month’s first day—thus, the eleventh month’s tenth day. He releases a raven, which "flew back and forth until the waters dried," fully evaporating by the second month’s twenty-seventh day of Noah’s 601st year, spanning four months and seventeen days. Next, Noah sends a dove "to see if the waters had subsided." The dove flies out three times, finally finding dry land and not returning by the first day of the next year’s first month, its flights occurring over one month and eleven days.

The text mentions two bird species and varying reconnaissance durations without explanation. Biblical scholars note the dove story originates from the "J source" (828–722 BCE), while the raven tale is from the later "P source" (715–687 BCE). In Genesis, the raven precedes the dove. This order may reflect editing by Ezra, a priest during the Second Temple’s construction, completed in 457 BCE, with the Torah’s final reading around 445 BCE. Ezra likely arranged the bird passages without prioritizing source age. However, at the narrative’s end, he preserves sequence: J’s poetic promise from God—ensuring seasons and life persist—precedes P’s covenant against future floods and rules for righteous living. This editing reveals a complex, multi-stage Bible formation, showcasing meticulous preservation of variant traditions by descendants of Adam and Eve.

While the religious framework solidified in the fifth century BCE, the flood legend is far older. Here, we explore its origins and the mind behind Genesis’s earliest lines.

Genesis states "God" warns Noah of the flood, interpretable as a hunch by skeptics or prophecy by the devout. History records scientists like Descartes, Watt, Agassiz, Howe, Kekulé, Mendeleev, Cannon, Einstein, Bohr, and Watson receiving insights in dreams after rigorous study. Nobel laureate Otto Loewi credited a dream for revealing nerve stimulation chemicals.

Noah’s prototype was likely exceptional: artistic, observant, skilled, and experienced. He noticed anomalous warming, signaled by overflowing wells, swollen streams, waterlogged meadows, expanded lakes, new springs, and humid air and soil. As a farmer, he observed restless wildlife, unseasonal migrations, and early spring flora shifts. Watching snow-capped peaks, he imagined rapid melting’s impact. We propose global warming began 1.5–2 years prior, circa 11,270 ± 30 years ago (9270 ± 30 BCE), with milder winters, warmer falls, and hotter summers.

Analyzing these signs in a valley ringed by snowy ridges, Noah grew alarmed. In a dream, he envisioned a flood and a solution—an ark. Around 8,000 years ago, Persian Gulf mariners on Marawah Island built 18-meter reed boats, capable of carrying 36 tons. Genesis gives the ark’s size in cubits: 300×50×30. Ancient cubits varied; a Sumerian cubit (2170 BCE) was 49.5 cm, an Egyptian 18th Dynasty cubit (1550–1307 BCE) 52.3 cm, ranging 51.3–54.1 cm. Converted, the ark’s dimensions are 148.5/156.9 meters long, 24.75/26.15 meters wide, 14.85/15.69 meters high, with a deck area up to 10,825.65/12,308.8 square meters and volume of 54,579.3/64,375.1 cubic meters. Its estimated weight: ~4,500 tons.

Hominins crafted stone axes 1.7 million years ago; the oldest polished plank, from the Jordan Valley, dates 750,000–240,000 years. Complex wooden structures emerged 476,000 ± 23,000 years ago. Noah could work wood, but building a 4,500-ton vessel was daunting. Harvesting and processing such timber without mechanization challenges four men.

For context, the Titanic (259.83 meters long, 28.19 wide, 52,310 tons) had four decks for 2,566 passengers and ~1,000 crew. Modern liners like Queen Mary II (345×45×62 meters, 65,000 tons) hold 4,400, and Icon of the Seas (364×66 meters) accommodates 7,600 guests and 2,350 crew. The Cheops Pyramid (147 meters high, 230-meter base) dwarfs the ark, which, while large, isn’t cyclopean by today’s standards.

The ark housed seven humans, at least two of every bird, reptile, and mammal, and provisions. Genesis mandates seven pairs of "clean" cattle and birds. Today, there are 5,566 mammal, 11,125 bird, 10,064 reptile, and 6,684 amphibian species—26,755 vertebrate species, or 53,510 individuals minimum, excluding extra "clean" pairs. At 4–5 animals per square meter, numbers adjusted with births and deaths over the year.

The Genesis author likely didn’t envision saving 26,000+ chordates, assuming ~2,500 species, allotting ~2 square meters per "passenger." This explains the ark’s modest size relative to modern vertebrate counts.

J source lists "creeping things," "clean and unclean cattle" (mammals), and "birds." P source refines this: "clean and unclean cattle" (mammals), "beasts," "birds," "creeping things" (lizards, turtles), "reptiles" (snakes), "fish," "flying creatures" (bats), and "winged" (non-flying birds). In ancient Egypt, unblemished bulls and calves were "clean"; pigs were "unclean." Genesis omits insects, worms, and mollusks, most perishing in the flood.

J predates P by a century, yet their zoological lists differ markedly. J’s taxonomy may stem from an earlier, foundational Genesis text. Its author, a true nomenclature pioneer—predating Linnaeus and rivaling Aristotle—classified flora (grasses, shrubs, trees) and vertebrates (wild beasts, domesticated cattle, reptiles, birds). P adds fish, aquatic "creeping things" (amphibians), and "all living creatures."

Feeding Noah’s menagerie poses issues. If 53,510 animals drank 0.5 liters daily, 26.755 cubic meters of water were needed daily—10,000+ cubic meters for 375 days, plus 6 cubic meters for humans, occupying ~20% of the ark’s volume. Genesis implies food stores but omits water details. A sheep (68 kg) needs 1.3–1.8 kg hay daily (474.5–657 kg yearly). A 30-kg dog requires 0.6–0.75 kg meat daily (219–273.7 kg yearly). An average American eats 905.5 kg annually, so Noah’s eight-person family needed ~7 tons of food. Total provisions likely exceeded passenger weight 7–10 times, with ~10,000 tons of water alone.

The British cruiser Kent (9,880 tons, 190 meters) and wooden ship Great Republic (102 meters, 4,000 tons) highlight the ark’s limits. Wooden hulls over 91.4 meters risk bending under waves, worsened by heavy loads, casting doubt on a wooden ark’s feasibility.

The diet included insects, fish, seeds, roots, fruits, branches, hay, minerals, and meat, stored meticulously for a year. Feeding, watering, and cleaning for 50,000+ creatures was likely beyond eight people without automation.

Collecting animals globally—from Australia, the Americas, Africa, Eurasia, and Antarctica—was implausible. Even top zoos—Berlin (1,373 species, 2017), Moscow (1,267, 2019), Henry Doorly (972, 2007)—fall short. Confined animals risk disease, conflict, and injury, especially prey near predators. Species need specific climates; the sealed ark, unventilated for 264 days, risked suffocation. Darkness, motion, and uncertainty added stress. Taking just one pair per species threatens survival—modern science suggests 50 individuals prevent inbreeding, 500 ensure adaptability, and 1,000+ are optimal. Human populations never shrank to a handful; late Pleistocene Homo sapiens numbered ~100,000.

Modern ark replicas—like Johan Huibers’s 2007 Dutch model (70×13×9 meters), his 2011 full-scale version (135×30×23 meters), Hong Kong’s 2009 structure (137.2 meters), and Ark Encounter’s 2016 build (155.5×25.9×15.5 meters, 15.8 tons)—prove small teams can construct large vessels with modern tools, steel, and timber. But Noah lacked such resources, and the ark’s size, animal numbers, and provisions strain credibility.

Mesopotamian tales echo Genesis. Sumerian flood myths from Isin’s early dynasty (2017–1896 BCE) and Babylonian texts (2000–1600 BCE) feature Ziusudra building a ship for a seven-day flood. In the Epic of Gilgamesh (18th–17th century BCE), Utnapishtim’s cubic vessel (120 cubits per side, six decks) in Shuruppak holds silver, gold, creatures, family, and craftsmen during a six-day flood. Shuruppak (modern Tell Fara) thrived 3000–2000 BCE. Utnapishtim’s ship (59.4 meters, Sumerian cubit) rivals Ur’s ziggurat base (64×46 meters), suggesting Genesis’s ark drew from Akkadian designs, as pharaohs outdid Mesopotamian tombs.

Genesis’s flood tale likely postdates 2000 BCE, echoing Sumerian and Babylonian myths. We propose the event was real but local, and Noah’s refuge wasn’t a wooden ark but a cave.

The Zagros’s Kermanshah valleys, rich in caves used by ancient humans and modern shepherds, are the likely disaster site. Floodwaters, triggered by Seymare River landslides, reached 1,430–1,440 meters. Caves above this—like Do-Ashkaft (34°24'02"N, 47°07'43"E, ~1,560 meters)—served as stone "arks."

Kermanshah sees winter and early spring rains, with Indian Ocean precipitation peaking in May. Noah, a farmer and herder descended from Adam and Cain, kept sheep, a skill from Abel’s line. He wintered in highlands near caves, shielding flocks. Anticipating disaster, he summoned family from lowlands, some possibly with him. They lived in tents, using caves during bad weather.

Do-Ashkaft’s main chamber (23×15 meters) has a spring and paleolithic sheep-goat traces. Nearby, 14 caves within 1×7 km held ancient tools, used seasonally for shelter. From Do-Ashkaft, Noah could witness the valley’s flooding.

Noah likely wintered in the mountains, with caves housing livestock and tents for humans. Kermanshah averages 400 mm annual rain, heaviest in January–February, lightest June–August. Planning a spring descent, Noah faced 1.5–2 years of warming, melting snows, swelling streams, and frequent landslides. He stayed put, calling family up as a May cyclone hit, blocking paths with rain, mudslides, and avalanches. Lowland farmers drowned, leaving Noah’s group safe in Do-Ashkaft.

Genesis’s "all flesh perished" reflects Noah’s known community’s loss. Post-flood, he lived in a tent, implying destroyed infrastructure—homes, wells, roads, and fields.

A wooden ark without metal fasteners would collapse in storms, but caves offered refuge. At 1,440 meters, a peninsula formed with peaks like Kuh-e Takaltu (2,480 meters) and Kuh-e Gol Zard (2,910 meters). From Farrokhshad (2,390 meters), Noah saw the flooded valley.

Eight people could survive in a cave with 7,244 kg of food (145 sheep at 50 kg each). Do-Ashkaft’s 345 square meters held 230 sheep at 1.5 square meters each, with grazing slopes and a spring. Hunting and winter stores supplemented supplies, enabling a year’s isolation, outlasting shorter floods in Mesopotamian tales.

The real flood’s duration is unknown, but Kermanshah’s waters could hit 1,440 meters, submerging fields below Do-Ashkaft’s entrance. This terrifying scene, with distant peaks obscured, left a lasting mark, evolving into myth through oral tradition, Sumerian tablets, Gilgamesh, and Genesis. Religious interpretations came later.

Global warming 11,270 ± 30 years ago triggered floods worldwide, spawning diverse myths. Confirming our hypothesis requires studying Kermanshah’s sediments for 11,270-year-old flood traces, dating Seymare’s Kani Mar landslides, and calculating basin flooding feasibility. The Gharehsoo (5,793 km²) and Gamasiab (11,040 km²) basins total 16,833 km², feeding the Seymare. If cyclone "Noah" matched 1966’s Denise (1,825 mm/m²), it dumped 30.720225 km³ daily, amassing 1,228.809 km³ in forty days. At 1,440 meters, with a 1,160-meter base, "Noah’s lake" (3,331.52 km², 3,186.77 km² water) filled in 22.82 days by rain alone, overflowing via Kani Mar and Ban Galan. A 1,041 mm/m² rain (43 mm/hour) over forty days—far below Shangdi’s 401 mm/hour—suffices, proving a biblical-scale flood plausible. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?

  Who, When, and Where Wrote the Book of Genesis?  A Medical Hypothesis By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD & Lyudmila N. Arkhipova, BSN     CONTENT [i]   Abstract [ii]   Introduction [iii]   Egyptian physician [iv]   Asian diviner [v]   Conclusion [vi]   References [vii]   Application [i]   Abstract The Book of Genesis is an example of an ancient literary text that contains important medical insights. We propose that it was written in northern Egypt in the late 17th century BCE, approximately ten years after the Minoan eruption. The protograph likely emerged from the collaboration between an Asiatic seer, who rose to the rank of an Egyptian official, and an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist. By refining its dating and authorship, this hypothesis positions Genesis as a credible source of medical and historical data, thereby enhancing its value for interdisciplinary research. [ii]   Introduction According to Rabbinic Judais...

13c.Soligalich

   Soligalich , icon, Jacob wrestling with the angel ( 13 cent. ).   Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Ja cob wa s left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not pre vail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Soligalich  – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel ( 13 cent. ); original in the  leonovval...

CRITICAL MASS OF CONSENSUS

Online version from 07/03/2025   Critical mass of consensus:  Opinions on the importance of ligamentum capitis femoris (XX-XXI century) Arkhipov S . V. Content [i]   Abstract [ii]   Opinions [iii]   Authors & Affiliations [iv]   References [v]   Appendices [i]   Abstract This evolving article collects views on the importance of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) to the musculoskeletal system. Our collection aims to highlight the emerging fundamental shift in the current consensus in the orthopaedic and musculoskeletal research communities regarding the meaning of LCF. Here the convinced convince others. Ultimately, this once-unconventional idea will become established knowledge, enabling a transformation in clinicians’ thinking and in approaches to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hip joint pathologies. [ii]   Opinions   2025 «The LT [LCF] works as a secondary static stabilizer of the hip by acting as a sling to preven...

Main Scheme

  Interaction of ligaments of the hip joint and muscles during single-leg support  BLOG CONTENT IMAGES AND VIDEOS

LCF in 2025 (May)

  LCF in 2025 (May): Quotes from articles and books published in May 2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris. Teytelbaum, D. E., Bijanki, V., Samuel, S. P., Silva, S., Israel, H., & van Bosse, H. J. Does Open Reduction of Arthrogrypotic Hips Cause Stiffness?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics , 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002940  [i]   journals.lww.com   SANTORI, N., & TECCE, S. M. (2025). FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ARTHROSCOPY FOR HIP TRAUMA. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 136-143.  [ii]   books.google   RANDELLI, F. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC FREE-BODY REMOVAL AFTER DISLOCATION OR AFTER BULLET/BOMB. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 1-11.  [iii]   books.google   APRATO, A. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES FOR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE REDUCTION AND FIXATION. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 38.  [iv]   books.google   Brinkman, J. C., & Hartigan, D. E. (2025). Indications f...

INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY

  Combined PDF version of the article: Arkhipov SV. Arkhipov SV. Inferior Portal for Hip A rthroscopy: A Pilot Experimental Study. This page contains a photocopy of the publication. The links for downloading the PDF version and the addresses of the online versions are given below.  The original in Russian is available at the link: Нижний портал для артроскопии тазобедренного сустава . 

Inferior Portal. Part 2.

  Original in Russian is available at the link:  Нижний портал. Часть 2.  below is a machine translation edited by a non-native speaker.     INFERIOR PORTAL FOR HIP ARTHROSCOPY: A PILOT STUDY PART 2.  Inferior Portal Prototypes Arkhipov S.V., Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland   CONTENTS PART 1.  Background and Hypothesis [1] . Introduction [2] .  Passage through the Inferior Portal [3] .  Main Advantages of the Proposed Technique [4] .  Specific Risks of the Proposed Technique [5] .  Main Limitations of the Proposed Technique [6] . References (Part 1)   PART 2. Inferior Portal Prototypes [7] . Open Reduction [8] .  Puncture and Arthrography [9] . Arthroscopy and Debridement [10] . References (Part 2)   [7] . Open  R eduction   Our idea to reduce the trauma of hip joint surgery through an inferior approach has a rich history. In the spring of 1907, Professor Karl Rudolf Ludloff (1864-1945, photo )...

ARTICLE ANNOUNCEMENT: THE BOOK OF BERESHIT AS A GREAT COMPILATION

  Article Announcement: «The Book of Bereshit as a Great Compilation of Texts and Meanings from the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt: A Pilot Culturological, Medical, Archaeological, and Textological Examination of the Legends versus Traditional Attribution»   By Sergey V. Arkhipov, MD, PhD  Joensuu, Finland   Abstract The Book of Bereshit (Genes is) was composed in Egypt during the 17th century BCE and reached its definitive protographic form following the Minoan eruption  of Thera . This study argues that the work was a collaborative effort between an Egyptian physician-encyclopedist and an outstanding scribe of Asiatic origin, operating within a sophisticated administrative and scientific framework. By analyzing anatomical descriptions, Bronze Age economic data, and climatic markers, this paper demonstrates that the text originated as a high-level socio-political commission within the Egyptian House of Life. Keywords Genesis Protograph, Bereshi...

LCF in 2026 (January)

  L CF in 2026 ( January )   (Quotes from articles and books published in  January  2026 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris)   Villegas Meza, A. D., Nocek, M., Felan, N. A., Speshock, A., Bolia, I. K., & Philippon, M. J. (2025). Hip Microinstability: Current Concepts in Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Outcomes A Narrative Review. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine , 205-221.   [i]   tandfonline.com   ,   dovepress.com   Wang, C. H., Wang, J. H., Lin, Y. H., Shih, C. A., & Hong, C. K. (2026). An Unusual Mechanical Cause of Hip Subluxation Following Modified Dunn Procedure for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Case Report. Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders , 10-4103.   [ii]     journals.lww.com   Alsaghaier, A. (2026). Results of spica cast in treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children between 6-18 Months. Journal of Academic Research , 30 , 28-43.   [...