Skip to main content

Human Children. Retelling of Chapter 10

   

Short retelling of chapter 10 of the essay: Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [In Russian] 

Chapter 10. THE ARK AND THE CAVE

The Book of Genesis does not specify where Noah lived before the flood, but it is plausible his home was in the "land of Nod." To save his family and terrestrial animals, Noah builds an ark measuring "three hundred cubits" long, "fifty cubits" wide, and "thirty cubits" high, coated with pitch inside and out. The vessel has three decks, a pyramidal roof, a side door, and a window, likely at the top. Noah loads his wife, three sons with their wives, and representatives of birds, reptiles, and "clean and unclean cattle." The text lists some "passengers": Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and mentions "beasts," "cattle," "creeping things," "flying creatures," "birds," and "winged things." God instructs Noah to take seven pairs of "clean" animals and birds, and two pairs of "unclean" ones. The command is presumably followed exactly. The catastrophic flood wipes out all land vertebrates except those aboard the colossal ark and Noah’s eight-person family.

The flood narrative, with its tragic events, uplifting resolution, and moral lessons, feels coherent. However, inconsistencies arise. Before the flood, "God" limits human lifespan to 120 years, yet Noah lives to 950, outlasting Adam’s 930 years. Others, like Terah (205 years), Abraham (175), Isaac (180), and Jacob (147), also exceed this limit. In contrast, the longest verified modern human lifespan is 122.45 years.

During the voyage, Noah experiments to gauge receding water levels, starting forty days after the tenth month’s first day—thus, the eleventh month’s tenth day. He releases a raven, which "flew back and forth until the waters dried," fully evaporating by the second month’s twenty-seventh day of Noah’s 601st year, spanning four months and seventeen days. Next, Noah sends a dove "to see if the waters had subsided." The dove flies out three times, finally finding dry land and not returning by the first day of the next year’s first month, its flights occurring over one month and eleven days.

The text mentions two bird species and varying reconnaissance durations without explanation. Biblical scholars note the dove story originates from the "J source" (828–722 BCE), while the raven tale is from the later "P source" (715–687 BCE). In Genesis, the raven precedes the dove. This order may reflect editing by Ezra, a priest during the Second Temple’s construction, completed in 457 BCE, with the Torah’s final reading around 445 BCE. Ezra likely arranged the bird passages without prioritizing source age. However, at the narrative’s end, he preserves sequence: J’s poetic promise from God—ensuring seasons and life persist—precedes P’s covenant against future floods and rules for righteous living. This editing reveals a complex, multi-stage Bible formation, showcasing meticulous preservation of variant traditions by descendants of Adam and Eve.

While the religious framework solidified in the fifth century BCE, the flood legend is far older. Here, we explore its origins and the mind behind Genesis’s earliest lines.

Genesis states "God" warns Noah of the flood, interpretable as a hunch by skeptics or prophecy by the devout. History records scientists like Descartes, Watt, Agassiz, Howe, Kekulé, Mendeleev, Cannon, Einstein, Bohr, and Watson receiving insights in dreams after rigorous study. Nobel laureate Otto Loewi credited a dream for revealing nerve stimulation chemicals.

Noah’s prototype was likely exceptional: artistic, observant, skilled, and experienced. He noticed anomalous warming, signaled by overflowing wells, swollen streams, waterlogged meadows, expanded lakes, new springs, and humid air and soil. As a farmer, he observed restless wildlife, unseasonal migrations, and early spring flora shifts. Watching snow-capped peaks, he imagined rapid melting’s impact. We propose global warming began 1.5–2 years prior, circa 11,270 ± 30 years ago (9270 ± 30 BCE), with milder winters, warmer falls, and hotter summers.

Analyzing these signs in a valley ringed by snowy ridges, Noah grew alarmed. In a dream, he envisioned a flood and a solution—an ark. Around 8,000 years ago, Persian Gulf mariners on Marawah Island built 18-meter reed boats, capable of carrying 36 tons. Genesis gives the ark’s size in cubits: 300×50×30. Ancient cubits varied; a Sumerian cubit (2170 BCE) was 49.5 cm, an Egyptian 18th Dynasty cubit (1550–1307 BCE) 52.3 cm, ranging 51.3–54.1 cm. Converted, the ark’s dimensions are 148.5/156.9 meters long, 24.75/26.15 meters wide, 14.85/15.69 meters high, with a deck area up to 10,825.65/12,308.8 square meters and volume of 54,579.3/64,375.1 cubic meters. Its estimated weight: ~4,500 tons.

Hominins crafted stone axes 1.7 million years ago; the oldest polished plank, from the Jordan Valley, dates 750,000–240,000 years. Complex wooden structures emerged 476,000 ± 23,000 years ago. Noah could work wood, but building a 4,500-ton vessel was daunting. Harvesting and processing such timber without mechanization challenges four men.

For context, the Titanic (259.83 meters long, 28.19 wide, 52,310 tons) had four decks for 2,566 passengers and ~1,000 crew. Modern liners like Queen Mary II (345×45×62 meters, 65,000 tons) hold 4,400, and Icon of the Seas (364×66 meters) accommodates 7,600 guests and 2,350 crew. The Cheops Pyramid (147 meters high, 230-meter base) dwarfs the ark, which, while large, isn’t cyclopean by today’s standards.

The ark housed seven humans, at least two of every bird, reptile, and mammal, and provisions. Genesis mandates seven pairs of "clean" cattle and birds. Today, there are 5,566 mammal, 11,125 bird, 10,064 reptile, and 6,684 amphibian species—26,755 vertebrate species, or 53,510 individuals minimum, excluding extra "clean" pairs. At 4–5 animals per square meter, numbers adjusted with births and deaths over the year.

The Genesis author likely didn’t envision saving 26,000+ chordates, assuming ~2,500 species, allotting ~2 square meters per "passenger." This explains the ark’s modest size relative to modern vertebrate counts.

J source lists "creeping things," "clean and unclean cattle" (mammals), and "birds." P source refines this: "clean and unclean cattle" (mammals), "beasts," "birds," "creeping things" (lizards, turtles), "reptiles" (snakes), "fish," "flying creatures" (bats), and "winged" (non-flying birds). In ancient Egypt, unblemished bulls and calves were "clean"; pigs were "unclean." Genesis omits insects, worms, and mollusks, most perishing in the flood.

J predates P by a century, yet their zoological lists differ markedly. J’s taxonomy may stem from an earlier, foundational Genesis text. Its author, a true nomenclature pioneer—predating Linnaeus and rivaling Aristotle—classified flora (grasses, shrubs, trees) and vertebrates (wild beasts, domesticated cattle, reptiles, birds). P adds fish, aquatic "creeping things" (amphibians), and "all living creatures."

Feeding Noah’s menagerie poses issues. If 53,510 animals drank 0.5 liters daily, 26.755 cubic meters of water were needed daily—10,000+ cubic meters for 375 days, plus 6 cubic meters for humans, occupying ~20% of the ark’s volume. Genesis implies food stores but omits water details. A sheep (68 kg) needs 1.3–1.8 kg hay daily (474.5–657 kg yearly). A 30-kg dog requires 0.6–0.75 kg meat daily (219–273.7 kg yearly). An average American eats 905.5 kg annually, so Noah’s eight-person family needed ~7 tons of food. Total provisions likely exceeded passenger weight 7–10 times, with ~10,000 tons of water alone.

The British cruiser Kent (9,880 tons, 190 meters) and wooden ship Great Republic (102 meters, 4,000 tons) highlight the ark’s limits. Wooden hulls over 91.4 meters risk bending under waves, worsened by heavy loads, casting doubt on a wooden ark’s feasibility.

The diet included insects, fish, seeds, roots, fruits, branches, hay, minerals, and meat, stored meticulously for a year. Feeding, watering, and cleaning for 50,000+ creatures was likely beyond eight people without automation.

Collecting animals globally—from Australia, the Americas, Africa, Eurasia, and Antarctica—was implausible. Even top zoos—Berlin (1,373 species, 2017), Moscow (1,267, 2019), Henry Doorly (972, 2007)—fall short. Confined animals risk disease, conflict, and injury, especially prey near predators. Species need specific climates; the sealed ark, unventilated for 264 days, risked suffocation. Darkness, motion, and uncertainty added stress. Taking just one pair per species threatens survival—modern science suggests 50 individuals prevent inbreeding, 500 ensure adaptability, and 1,000+ are optimal. Human populations never shrank to a handful; late Pleistocene Homo sapiens numbered ~100,000.

Modern ark replicas—like Johan Huibers’s 2007 Dutch model (70×13×9 meters), his 2011 full-scale version (135×30×23 meters), Hong Kong’s 2009 structure (137.2 meters), and Ark Encounter’s 2016 build (155.5×25.9×15.5 meters, 15.8 tons)—prove small teams can construct large vessels with modern tools, steel, and timber. But Noah lacked such resources, and the ark’s size, animal numbers, and provisions strain credibility.

Mesopotamian tales echo Genesis. Sumerian flood myths from Isin’s early dynasty (2017–1896 BCE) and Babylonian texts (2000–1600 BCE) feature Ziusudra building a ship for a seven-day flood. In the Epic of Gilgamesh (18th–17th century BCE), Utnapishtim’s cubic vessel (120 cubits per side, six decks) in Shuruppak holds silver, gold, creatures, family, and craftsmen during a six-day flood. Shuruppak (modern Tell Fara) thrived 3000–2000 BCE. Utnapishtim’s ship (59.4 meters, Sumerian cubit) rivals Ur’s ziggurat base (64×46 meters), suggesting Genesis’s ark drew from Akkadian designs, as pharaohs outdid Mesopotamian tombs.

Genesis’s flood tale likely postdates 2000 BCE, echoing Sumerian and Babylonian myths. We propose the event was real but local, and Noah’s refuge wasn’t a wooden ark but a cave.

The Zagros’s Kermanshah valleys, rich in caves used by ancient humans and modern shepherds, are the likely disaster site. Floodwaters, triggered by Seymare River landslides, reached 1,430–1,440 meters. Caves above this—like Do-Ashkaft (34°24'02"N, 47°07'43"E, ~1,560 meters)—served as stone "arks."

Kermanshah sees winter and early spring rains, with Indian Ocean precipitation peaking in May. Noah, a farmer and herder descended from Adam and Cain, kept sheep, a skill from Abel’s line. He wintered in highlands near caves, shielding flocks. Anticipating disaster, he summoned family from lowlands, some possibly with him. They lived in tents, using caves during bad weather.

Do-Ashkaft’s main chamber (23×15 meters) has a spring and paleolithic sheep-goat traces. Nearby, 14 caves within 1×7 km held ancient tools, used seasonally for shelter. From Do-Ashkaft, Noah could witness the valley’s flooding.

Noah likely wintered in the mountains, with caves housing livestock and tents for humans. Kermanshah averages 400 mm annual rain, heaviest in January–February, lightest June–August. Planning a spring descent, Noah faced 1.5–2 years of warming, melting snows, swelling streams, and frequent landslides. He stayed put, calling family up as a May cyclone hit, blocking paths with rain, mudslides, and avalanches. Lowland farmers drowned, leaving Noah’s group safe in Do-Ashkaft.

Genesis’s "all flesh perished" reflects Noah’s known community’s loss. Post-flood, he lived in a tent, implying destroyed infrastructure—homes, wells, roads, and fields.

A wooden ark without metal fasteners would collapse in storms, but caves offered refuge. At 1,440 meters, a peninsula formed with peaks like Kuh-e Takaltu (2,480 meters) and Kuh-e Gol Zard (2,910 meters). From Farrokhshad (2,390 meters), Noah saw the flooded valley.

Eight people could survive in a cave with 7,244 kg of food (145 sheep at 50 kg each). Do-Ashkaft’s 345 square meters held 230 sheep at 1.5 square meters each, with grazing slopes and a spring. Hunting and winter stores supplemented supplies, enabling a year’s isolation, outlasting shorter floods in Mesopotamian tales.

The real flood’s duration is unknown, but Kermanshah’s waters could hit 1,440 meters, submerging fields below Do-Ashkaft’s entrance. This terrifying scene, with distant peaks obscured, left a lasting mark, evolving into myth through oral tradition, Sumerian tablets, Gilgamesh, and Genesis. Religious interpretations came later.

Global warming 11,270 ± 30 years ago triggered floods worldwide, spawning diverse myths. Confirming our hypothesis requires studying Kermanshah’s sediments for 11,270-year-old flood traces, dating Seymare’s Kani Mar landslides, and calculating basin flooding feasibility. The Gharehsoo (5,793 km²) and Gamasiab (11,040 km²) basins total 16,833 km², feeding the Seymare. If cyclone "Noah" matched 1966’s Denise (1,825 mm/m²), it dumped 30.720225 km³ daily, amassing 1,228.809 km³ in forty days. At 1,440 meters, with a 1,160-meter base, "Noah’s lake" (3,331.52 km², 3,186.77 km² water) filled in 22.82 days by rain alone, overflowing via Kani Mar and Ban Galan. A 1,041 mm/m² rain (43 mm/hour) over forty days—far below Shangdi’s 401 mm/hour—suffices, proving a biblical-scale flood plausible. 

Retelling done by Grok, an artificial intelligence developed by xAI.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS


                                                                    

Author:

Arkhipov S.V. – candidate of medical sciences, surgeon, traumatologist-orthopedist. 

Citation:

Архипов С.В. Дети человеческие: истоки библейских преданий в обозрении врача. Эссе, снабженное ссылками на интерактивный материал. 2-е изд. перераб. и доп. Йоэнсуу: Издание Автора, 2025. 

Arkhipov S.V. Human Children: The Origins of Biblical Legends from a Physician's Perspective. An essay with references to interactive materials. 2nd revised and expanded edition. Joensuu: Author's Edition, 2025. [Rus]

Purchase:

PDF version is available on GooglePlay & Google Books

Keywords

ligamentum capitis femoris, ligamentum teres, ligament of head of femur, history, first patient, injury, damage, Bible, Genesis

BLOG CONTENT

ANCIENT MENTIONS


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CATALOG OF LITERATURE ON THE LCF

  Catalog of literature on the LCF (Books, articles, links, reference, mention …) NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE (8,000 to 2,000 years BCE)  https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/neolithic-and-bronze.html   IRON AGE (10th-1st century BCE) https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/iron-age.html   1st-10th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/1st-10th-century.html   11th-15th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/11th-15th-century.html   16th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/16th-century.html   17th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/17th-century.html   18th Century https :// roundligament . blogspot . com /2024/10/18 th - century . html   19th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/19th-century.html   20th Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/20th-century.html   21st Century https://roundligament.blogspot.com/2024/10/21st-century.html BLOG CONTENT TH...

1833GerdyPN

  P.N. Gerdy, in his experiment, discovered tensioning of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) during thigh adduction. At the same time, it was noted for the first time that the consequence of LCF tension during hip adduction is a downward and lateral displacement of the femoral head. Normally, this mechanism provides unloading of the upper articular surfaces when supporting one leg (see 1874SavoryWS ). The translation from French was done in collaboration with ChatGPT 3.5.   Gerdy PN. Physiologie médicale, didactique et critique. T. 1. Paris: Librairie de Crochard, 1833. [fragment] Quote pp. 551-554   L'inclinaison de la cuisse en dehors, que l'on nomme son abduction, est un mouvement assez étendu, mais qui pourtant ne permet pas à la cuisse de se placer perpendiculairement à sa direction verticale. Les batteleurs peuvent se reposer sur un plan horizontal, les cuisses écartées en sens opposé. Dans l'inclinaison ...

LCF in 2025 (May)

  LCF in 2025 (May): Quotes from articles and books published in May 2025 mentioning the ligamentum capitis femoris. Teytelbaum, D. E., Bijanki, V., Samuel, S. P., Silva, S., Israel, H., & van Bosse, H. J. Does Open Reduction of Arthrogrypotic Hips Cause Stiffness?. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics , 10-1097. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002940  [i]   journals.lww.com   SANTORI, N., & TECCE, S. M. (2025). FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ARTHROSCOPY FOR HIP TRAUMA. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 136-143.  [ii]   books.google   RANDELLI, F. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC FREE-BODY REMOVAL AFTER DISLOCATION OR AFTER BULLET/BOMB. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 1-11.  [iii]   books.google   APRATO, A. (2025). ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES FOR FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE REDUCTION AND FIXATION. Advancements of Hip Arthroscopy in Trauma , 38.  [iv]   books.google   Brinkman, J. C., & Hartigan, D. E. (2025). Indications f...

1290Egerton1066

  Miniature Jacob Wrestling with the Angel from Egerton 1066 (ca. 1270 – 1290?).  Depicting the circumstances and mechanism of the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) injury based on the description in the Book of Genesis: 25 And Jacob was left alone; and there wrestled a man with him until the breaking of the day. 26 And when he saw that he could not pre vail against him, he struck against the hollow of his thigh ; and the hollow of Jacob's thigh was put out of joint, as he was wrestling with him. … 33 Therefore do the children of Israel not eat the sinew which shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh, unto this day; because he struck against the hollow of Jacob's thigh on the sinew that shrank.  ( 1922LeeserI , Genesis (Bereshit) 32:25-26,33) More about the plot in our work:  Ninth month, eleventh day   ( 2024 АрхиповСВ. Девятый месяц, одиннадцатый день ).     Initial E from Egerton 1066 – Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (ca. 1270 – 1290?) original ...

ChatGPT. Scientific Review On the Article: “Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective”

  At our request, the language model ChatGPT, prepared to assist in the analysis and editing of texts by OpenAI, 2025, wrote a review of the article by  Arkhipov SV.   Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective: A Note on the Mysterious ‘Dark Matter’ in the Hip Joint   ([Ru]  Архипов СВ .  Почему восстановление вертлужной губы может быть неэффективно?: Заметка о таинственной «темной материи» в тазобедренном суставе.  06.04.2025 ).  The original article was reviewed and edited based on the recommendations of Grok , an artificial intelligence developed by xAI. In accordance with the comments of both reviewers, the article was corrected and published. Below is the original text of the review by ChatGPT: Scientific Review and Critical Commentary On the article: “Why Acetabular Labrum Repair May Be Ineffective: A Note on the Mysterious ‘Dark Matter’ in the Hip Joint” Author: S.V. Arkhipov, Independent Researcher, Joensuu, Finland I. Scientific...

INVITATION TO COOPERATION

  We offer cooperation in the following areas: - biomechanics of the hip joint in normal and pathological conditions; - hip joint endoprostheses with ligament analogues; - non-standard methods of arthroscopy of the hip joint; - reconstruction and prosthetics of the ligament of head of femur; - early diagnosis of coxarthrosis and pathology of the ligament of head of femur; - pathogenesis of dystrophic diseases of the hip joint; - joints with flexible elements for walking robots. Please send correspondence to: archipovlcfbooks&gmail.com With sincere respect to you, Sergey Arkhipov                                                                      . Translated from Russian in collaboration with ChatGPT (version 3.5, developed by OpenAI) and the Google Translate service. Original text: Мы п...

THE DOCTRINE OF LCF

  THE DOCTRINE OF  ligamentum capitis femoris:   An Instrument of Knowledge and Innovation. Definition: A set of theoretical provisions on all aspects of knowledge about the anatomical element ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF). 1. Structure of the Doctrine of LCF 2.  Practical Application of the Doctrine of LCF : 2.1. Diagnostics 2.1. Prevention   2.3. Prognosis 2.4. Pathology 2.5. Veterinary   2.6. Professions     2.7. Products     2.8. Surgery   3. Theory of LCF Mechanics    4. The Base of the Doctrine of LCF 5. Stairway to the Past or History of the Doctrine of LCF 6. Ultimate Depth of Researches   7. Appendices 7.1. Acceptable Synonyms      Structure of the Doctrine of  ligamentum  capitis  femoris .       E     a     R                   T                   ...

1996(c)ArkhipovSV

  Hip joint prostheses ( Протез тазобедренного сустава ) Patent Application RU96110383A Inventor Сергей Васильевич Архипов Original Assignee Sergey Vasilyevich Arkhipov Application RU96110383/14A events 1996-05-23 Application filed by С.В. Архипов 1998-08-10 Publication of RU96110383A Claims 1. The hip joint prosthesis comprising a femoral component, are fixed in the femoral head, characterized in that the femoral component is designed as a pyramid whose base has the form of a spherical surface, and the faces contains ledges perpendicular trabecular bone, in addition to the femoral component coupled to the flexible member, which is passed through a through hole formed in the femoral component, and the ends of the flexible member are provided with fastening elements. 2. The prosthesis of claim. 1, characterized in that the fastening elements are made of a metal with shape memory. 3. The prosthesis of claim. 1, characterized in that the faces of the femoral component have...

Main Scheme

  Interaction of ligaments of the hip joint and muscles during single-leg support  BLOG CONTENT IMAGES AND VIDEOS

ACETABULAR CANAL

   Acetabular Canal  (Anatomy, topography and significance of the functioning area of ​​the ligamentum capitis femoris) Acetabular Canal.  Part 1.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  Acetabular Canal.  Part 2.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  Acetabular Canal.  Part 3.   This article describes the space where the ligamentum capitis femoris (LCF) attaches and functions.  BLOG CONTENT THE DOCTRINE OF LCF MORPHOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY                                                                                                          ...