Ancient Textual Sources on Ligamentum Teres:
Context and Transmission
S.V. Arkhipov, I.V. Prolygina
KEYWORDS: ancient medicine;
ancient traumatology; Galen; Hippocrates; hip joint; ligamentum capitis
femoris; ligament of head of femur; ligamentum teres.
SUMMARY
Background. One of the least
researched anatomical structures of the human body is the ligament of head of
femur, most often referred to as ligamentum teres. The history of the
nomination of this term, medical contexts of its use, the etymology and the
first synonyms (Figure 1) are not
sufficiently understood.
Purpose. The purpose of the
article is to present the most complete collection of evidence from ancient
medical authors about the term ligamentum teres, trace the history of its
nomination and analyze the gradual changes in the level of knowledge about the
anatomy, mechanical and geometric properties of this structure, its pathology
and treatment methods.
Methods. The study is based
on an interdisciplinary approach, comprising a combination of linguistic and
medical analysis of the texts in ancient Greek and Latin, which contain
references to ligamentum teres.
Results. Text analysis
showed that ligamentum teres was known in Palestine at the time of the
compilation of the Book of Genesis. In the medical sources written by the Greek
physicians, references to it and the description of its properties and role
date back to the V-IV cent. BC. The study of textual sources and their medical
contexts showed the evolution of the development of this term from the general
concept of “sinew” to a narrowly defined “ligament” with detailed qualitative
characteristics of the structure and function of this anatomical structure. It
has been noted that since ancient times ligamentum teres has been recognized as
an important element of biomechanics of hip joint and the action of walking.
Conclusions. This work will
serve as a basis for further studies and treatment of the interesting and
mysterious structure that is ligamentum teres – a true ligamentum incognitum.
Level of the
evidence: 1a
 |
| Figure 1. The first synonyms of the ligamentum teres (ligament of the head of femur) |
INTRODUCTION
Recently, the attention of
researchers and clinicians has been increasingly attracted by the
under-investigated anatomical structure ligamentum teres (LT), which connects
the femoral head and the acetabulum (1,2). Despite the fact that LT has been
known for over three millennia, its anatomy and function have not been fully
studied and continue to be refined (3-6). For instance, its role in the
musculoskeletal system is still not clear, and opinions on this issue are often
very divided (7-10). Some authors concluded that LT is a rudimentary structure
of hip joint (HJ) (11,12). The contemporary studies, however, regard it as a
fully functional ligament with the strength comparable to that of the anterior
cruciate ligament of the knee joint (8). The recent data show the importance of
LT as an HJ-stabilizing structure, which is involved in maintaining vertical
positions (13-17). LT is currently recognized as a potential source of pain as
well as mechanical symptoms in HJ, including gait impairment (3,18-24). The
evasive knowledge about LT is reflected in dozens of its synonyms, with its
original names unknown not only to laymen, but even to experts (7,23,25). In
some publications, including those claiming to be comprehensive, the earliest
extant evidence regarding LT is, in our opinion, insufficiently covered
(26,27). Therefore, this work attempts to provide the most complete review of
LT-related sources from ancient authors. We believe that this will make it
possible to clarify the earliest period of studying LT and knowledge about it,
and will help experts to better understand the basis of their research.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This study is based on an
interdisciplinary approach involving a combination of linguistic and medical knowledge.
The original fragments of ancient physicians on LT, written in ancient Greek
and Latin, as preserved in the electronic platform Thesaurus Linguae Graecae
(University of California, Irvine, CA, USA), were investigated in relation to
the modern views on normal and pathological anatomy of this anatomical element,
its role in the musculoskeletal system, its mechanical and geometric
properties. The pathology treatment methods are also considered.
This work submits to the
ethical standards of the Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal (28).
RESULTS
Biblical Tradition:
Genesis 32:32
Perhaps the earliest known
mention of LT is found in the Book of Genesis. The period of the compilation of
the Pentateuch, which includes the Book of Genesis, can be approximated only
with a very relative accuracy. Given the period of codification and the long
oral tradition of its sources, it can be dated to the period of the XIV-VI
centuries BC (29-31). In this ancient written source, LT is mentioned in the
context of the narrative of the Patriarch Jacob wrestling with God and
acquiring the name of Israel. Genesis 32:32 says:
“That is why to this day the
Israelites do not eat the thigh sinew which is at the hip socket: because he
had struck Jacob at the hip socket on the thigh sinew” (NJB).
In the Masoretic text of the
Biblia Hebraica, the expressionגִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה אֲשֶׁר עַל כַּף הַיָּרֵךְ is
used. It can literally be translated as “the thigh sinew, which [is located] in
the socket of the hip joint”. The etymology of the term הַנָּשֶׁה (hannasheh) is unclear, and the term גִּיד (gid) is translated as “sinew” (32).
The authors of the Septuagint
(LXX), the Greek translation of the Old Testament (III-I cent. BC in
Alexandria) from a pre-masoretic version of the Hebrew text, rendered this text
as: τὸ νεῦρον ὃ ἐνάρκησεν ὅ ἐστιν ἐπι τοῦ πλάτους τοῦ μηροῦ, that is, “the sinew which
shrank, which is upon the hollow of the thigh» (KJV). The translators,
apparently, linked the word hannasheh (LXX: ἐνάρκησεν) with the root
nashah, interpreting it as “to dislocate”, “become weak”. From the point of
view of modern medicine, it can be assumed that in this case we are talking
about damage to acetabulum.
The Latin translation of the
Bible, the so-called Vulgate, was completed in the IV century AD by St. Jerome,
who translated the Bible directly from Hebrew, but was also very familiar with
the Greek text of the Septuagint. This fragment described above is conveyed
there as follows: nervum qui emarcuit in femore Iacob, “sinew, which weakened
in Jacob's thigh”. The Hebrew, the Greek and the Latin texts formed the basis
for all the subsequent translations into other ancient and modern languages, as
well as for patristic, Jewish and modern biblical comments.
Most biblical commentators
agree that Genesis 32:32 mentions the sciatic nerve (nervus ischiadicus), the
large nerve trunk of the femoral region, which the Greeks called the Achilles
tendon (33-35). Other commentators argue that this word refers to the tendon
which holds the head of the femur in the acetabulum, along with the surrounding
muscles (36). However, neither in the Pentateuch nor in the other Old Testament
books there is any further mention of the anatomical structure of HJ, so it is
difficult to establish the exact meaning. In our opinion, consistent with the
point of view of some other authors (37), this “sinew” is LT, since no muscle
tendons are attached in acetabulum and no large nerve trunks are present.
Moreover, the transverse section of the proximal end of LT reveals an
approximately cylindrical shape, resembling a tendon or a nerve fragment.
The quote from Genesis 32:32
has an important historical and medical implication for anatomy, traumatology,
and biomechanics of HJ. This fragment is one of the earliest mentions of HJ
and, possibly, the first written reference in the history of mankind to a special
anatomical element in it, that is, LT. It can be assumed that in Palestine of
the biblical times it was known that LT could be damaged by an indirect trauma
mechanism, for example, by a forced hip rotation, its subluxation and
dislocation. This is also the first known description of one of the earliest
visual symptoms of LT injury, that is, lameness. In addition, Genesis provides
perhaps the first “medical history” of HJ and LT injury. As befits the modern
medical record, the patient’s name, marital status, personal characteristics,
approximate age and working conditions are described, as well as the
circumstances, time and location of the injury, localization of the damage, its
mechanism, consequences and pathomorphology. From further narration (Genesis 50:2),
we learn that the Patriarch Jacob was posthumously embalmed by Egyptian
physicians, first mentioned in Genesis as representatives of a specific and
separate profession (25). This allows us to conclude that the diagnosis of LT
injury could be morphologically verified by means of some prototype of
pathological study. From the biblical text it follows that the resulting
biomechanical ambulation disorder turned out to be persistent, and the cause of
it was damage to HJ, or, more precisely, LT.
Paradoxical as it may seem, an
analysis of this ancient, not at all medical source, allows us to make a
significant assumption for modern science: LT is an important functional
relation of HJ, and only with it intact, normal-walking can be achieved, making
LT a part in the organization of this type of human locomotion.
The terms νεῦρον/nervus: Classical tradition
Ancient authors of the
Classical period did not initially distinguish between such anatomical
structures as tendon, ligament and nerve neither in terminology, nor,
apparently, in practice, as indicated by the absence of special names for each
one of them. There was a single term τὸ νεῦρον, to which the multivalent term “sinew” corresponds
most closely. It can mean “tendon”, “ligament”, “nerve”, as well as “vein” and
“artery”. The Latin term nervus has the same root as the Greek τὸ νεῦρον and generally has the same
initial meanings as “string”, “thread”, “fiber”, from which, by metaphorical
transfer, they acquired the medical meaning of “white fibrous threads that
support the muscles, connect the joints and transmit nerve or motor impulses”
(38). The term τὸ νεῦρον, in the meaning of “sinew”, which can mean “tendons”,
“ligaments”, and “muscles”, and possibly “large nerves” and “blood vessels”),
is found in Homer’s Iliad:
“<...> Phylides, taking
note / That bold Amphiclus bent at him, prevented him, and smote / His thigh's
extreme part, where of man his fattest muscle lies, / The nerves torn with his
lance's pile, and darkness clos'd his eyes” (Iliad XVI: 313-316).
Hippocrates (born 460 BC),
expounding in the treatise Places in Man on certain types of sinews, mentions
those that are “connected with joints,” meaning tendons, and “hollow veins”,
that is, blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, various ducts and bronchi (De loc.
in hom., 5) (39).
Apparently, it is about the
articular ligaments connecting two, and in some cases more, bone organs, that
Aristotle (IV cent. BC) writes in the History of Animals, mentioning that:
“they aid in the support of
the body <...> The sinews around the joints have not received any name,
for all the bones where they are contiguous are bound together by the sinew (νεύροις). And there are many sinews round all the bones”
(Hist. anim. III, V, 50 (515b 11).
The distinction between
nerves, muscles, tendons and ligaments first appears only in the anatomy of the
first Alexandrian school (III cent. BC). Herophilus (IV-III cent. BC) did not
yet have a clear distinction between nerves and muscles, since he recognized both
muscles and nerves as organs of voluntary movement (40). The idea of the
physiology of muscle contraction first appears in Erasistratus (IV-III cent.
BC). He believed that muscle contracted under the influence of the pneuma that
is contained within, and the nerves were deprived of any function in voluntary
movement (Gal. De loc. aff.) (41,42). In terminology, Erasistratus
distinguished between sensory (αἰσθητικά) and motor nerves
(πρακτικά, κινητικά).
Apparently, it was Pliny the
Elder (1st cent. AD) that used the Latin term nervus as applied to tendons in
Natural History. When speaking about the Achilles tendon, he calls it a “sinew”
(nervus), which is defined as “flat” (platys) (Hist. nat. 26, 90). He uses the
same term with reference to ligaments:
“In all animals they (nervi) are fastened to the lubricous surface of the bones, and so serve to fasten those knots in the body which are known as articulations or joints, sometimes lying between them, sometimes surrounding them, and sometimes running from one to the another; in one place the are long, and in another broad, according as the necessity of each case may demand” (Hist. nat. 11, 217).
Here we have one of the first
classifications of ligaments and the first use of the concept of “round” (lat.
teres, rotundum) used to describe ligaments in general. As for the nerves,
since they do resemble thin tendons, the ancient anatomists thought that they
served for flexion and extension of various parts of the body.
Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BC
– 50 AD) writes about a pathology of HJ ligaments, called “sinews” (nervis),
which are damaged and stretched when hip is dislocated:
“When the bone is replaced
nothing further need be done, but the patient must be kept in bed for a rather
long time or the thigh may become displaced again on moving while the sinews
(nervis) are still relaxed” (De med. VIII, 20, 8).
Galen of Pergamon (II-III
cent. AD) provides a more clear systematization of various kinds of sinews. He
often accompanies the term νεῦρον with clarifying
definitions or gives one-word synonyms. In the treatise On Bones for Beginners
Galen describes three types of sinews: those originating in the brain and
spinal cord - προαιρετικὰ νεῦρα, “sinews responsible for voluntary movements”;
originating in bones - συνδετικὰ νεῦρα, “connecting sinews” or συνδέσμους, “ligaments”; and originating in the muscles -
τένοντας, "tendons" (De oss.
ad tir., 24) (41). Speaking in the treatise On Movement of Muscles on the
origin of this term, he associates it with the verb νεύειν, “bow one’s head, nod” (De motu musc. 1, 1) (41).
13 centuries later, the
etymology and medical ambiguity of the term nervus would be discussed by
Andreas Vesalius (1514–1564) in his anatomical atlas On the Fabric of the Human
Body (1543), in which he’d accept and repeat the definitions of Galen (De humani
fabr. corp. IV, 1). The modern etymological dictionaries consider this
interpretation to be a paretymology and correlate the term νεῦρον with the verb νέω, “spin” (43),
implying the pulling and twisting of yarn from a tuft of wool.
In a later treatise, On the
Usefulness of Parts of the Body, Galen already clearly differentiates both the
terms and the functions of ligaments and nerves:
“Where a member needs only a
connection, there is only a ligament (σύνδεσμος), and where it
needs only a sensation, there is only a nerve (νεῦρον). On the contrary, in organs that could benefit from having voluntary
movement, you can see them together: a nerve that transmits an order received
from the center of thought and determines the principle of movement, and a
ligament that provides the nerve with its power to maintain the joints brought
into a state of movement” (De usu part. XII, 3, 7) (41).
Ancient medical
authors (prior to Galen) about ligamentum teres
In the history of ancient
medicine, LT and its topographic anatomy were first mentioned in the treatise
Instruments of Redactions by Hippocrates:
“The femur itself bends
outward and forward; its head is a round epiphysis which gives origin to
ligament (νεῦρον) inserted in the acetabulum
of the hip-joint. This bone is articulated somewhat obliquely, but less so than
the humerus” (Vectiar. 1) (39).
Indeed, LT attaches to the
bottom of acetabular fossa at an acute angle, and its counterpart in the
shoulder joint is at a right angle. This so-called “ligamentum teres in the
shoulder joint” is clearly visible in certain animal species and is otherwise
called ligamentum gleno-humerale (syn. lig. interarticulare humeri) (44,45).
Its counterpart in humans is not very prominent and is called ligamentum glenohumerale
superius (46,47). This fragment indirectly indicates that Hippocrates studied
the anatomy primarily by dissecting animal bodies.
It should be noted that
Hippocrates describes LT as an already well-known element, noting its location
and attachment to the bone of HJ. How could Hippocrates, who did not dissect
humans, observe LT? It is likely that he could have seen this anatomical
element when examining a patient with an open hip dislocation. This pathology
is a rare type of trauma that currently occurs with high energy trauma as a
result of a car accident and fall (48,49). Similar high-energy traumas could be
observed in the time of Hippocrates, for example, when one fell from height,
was hit by a large animal or by a heavy part of rigging of a ship.
In Galen’s IV commentary on
Hippocrates’ book On Joints, a fragment of the treatise On External Treatment
by the Greek physician Heraclides of Tarentum (III-II cent. BC) was preserved
(50). Speaking about the reduction of a dislocated hip, he gives the earliest
description of the pathology of LT resulting from this injury:
“Those who believe that the
hip does not remain set because the ligament (νεῦρον) connecting the femur to the acetabulum is torn, do not know things of
general knowledge, when expressing their negation. For neither Hippocrates nor
Diocles would have described the reductions, and neither would Phylotimus,
Evenor, Nileus, Molpis, Nymphodorus and some others. And we have achieved this
goal [reduction] in two children, although in adults the joint is dislocated
again more often. This case should be judged not from hearsay, but since the
thigh sometimes remains [set], it must be assumed that this ligament does not
always rupture, but that it stretches and contracts again <...>” (In
Hipp. de artic. IV, 40) (41).
From this fragment we learn
that in the days of Heraclides of Tarentum physicians already knew not only
about LT, its attachment to the hip and the acetabulum, as well as its
connecting function, but also about its injury incurred by a traumatic hip
dislocation. It is safe to assume that the author personally performed
anatomical studies of both normal and pathologically altered HJ. He also opined
that LT could stretch and contract, thus remaining intact after hip
dislocation. A few modern studies partly confirm the Heraclides of Tarentum’s
guess and indicate the possibility of LT recovery after hip dislocation
(18,51,52).
There is an extant fragment of
the text by another Greek surgeon, Hegetor, a native of Alexandria (II century
BC). The Apollonius of Citium’s (90-15 BC) commentary on the Hippocrates’ book
On Joints provides an excerpt from it:
“In the book “On Causes”,
Hegetor mentioned hip dislocation in the following passage: “Why don’t those
who rely only on experience seek to find any other [way] of reduction the
femoral head for those who have it dislocated, in such a way that every time it
dislocates, it can be reset? After all, we can observe that the lower jaw, and
the humeral head, the elbow, and the knee, and each finger, and the majority of
joints that may dislocate, can be reset in a similar way. For, not being able
to understand why this joint only, after dislocation and repeated reduction,
won’t remain in its place, and seeing what often happens with other joints, they
will probably come to the conclusion that there might be a better way of
reduction, after which the joint will stay [set]. If they only thought about
the reason from the point of view of anatomy, - because the femoral head is a
foundation for the ligament (νεῦρον) [of femoral
head], which grows into the middle of acetabulum; and when it remains [intact],
the femur cannot dislocate, but when it ruptures, the hip cannot provide a firm
connection; and when there is a lack of connection, the joint cannot remain in
place. Since the reason has been clarified, one can refrain altogether from a
reduction of a dislocated femur and not make attempts doomed to failure” (In
Hipp. de art.) (53).
Hegetor repeats the previously
known information about LT about the areas of its attachment and its anchoring
role, but, unlike Heraclides of Tarentum, he is somewhat pessimistic about the
possibility of reduction of hip dislocation. Perhaps the author in his practice
encountered cases of complicated dislocation accompanied by a fracture of the
wall of acetabulum or femoral head, or perhaps he was not able to differentiate
the dislocation from the femoral neck fracture. For these reasons, his attempts
to “set it” were not successful, which served as the basis for therapeutic pessimism.
Further, Apollonius of Citium
expresses its own opinion on this issue:
“If the dislocated and
displaced hip could not remain in place, then the physician [Hippocrates] would
have clearly indicated the incurability of this case, so that we would not be
led astray. Don't those who hold the opposite opinion know about the nature of
joints, ligaments and the teachings about these things in general? After all,
the physician considered the cause of the mild or, on the contrary, complex
displacement and reduction of the joints to lie in the natural structure,
condition, and strength or stretching of the ligaments (νεύρων), associated with fluid, so that, with respect to
femur dislocation, if it does not remain [in place], this happens not because
the ligament (νεῦρον) [of the femoral
head] is torn, but because of the natural weakening or stretching of the
ligaments (νεύρων), just as he says about the
bulls that their joints are mobile by nature” (In Hipp. de art.) (53).
In this fragment, the author
agrees with the views of Heraclides and Hippocrates, noting the possibility of
lengthening, weakening of strength and elasticity of LT. Apollonius of Citium
talks (already with confidence) about the possibility of pathological changes
in LT and transformation of its geometric and mechanical properties. These
changes, registered over 2000 years ago, are still the cause of differences in
the description of normal LT. It should also be noted that Apollonius of Citium
says, like Hippocrates, that ligaments, and hence LT, are present in animals
(cf. De artic. 8, 14-15; 52; Vectiar. 5, 5-6) (39).
Another mention of LT is found
in the Roman anatomist and physician Rufus of Ephesus (I-II cent. AD). Speaking
about the names of different body parts in the treatise De appellationibus
partium corporis humani, he writes:
“The name of pelvis (ἰσχίον) [is given to] the ligament (νεῦρον) that attaches to acetabulum and secures the entire
joint” (54).
The statement by Rufus
suggests that the author was aware of the existence of LT, its attachment to
acetabulum and its connective function.
Galen and the
Byzantine authors
Galen, who, along with
Hippocrates, had remained the main authority in the field of anatomy until the
time of Andreas Vesalius, mentions LT in a number of his treatises. In one of
his early essays, On Bones for Beginners, written for those who are just
beginning to study anatomy, Galen, explaining the structure of HJ, says:
“There is a socket of large
size in each of the ischia, attached by a very stout ligament (σύνδεσμος) to the head of the femur” (De oss. ad tir.
XX, 2) (41).
This quote is interesting in
that Galen notes, like the previous authors, that LT is attached directly to
the bones that form HJ, and not to its capsule or transverse acetabular
ligament. He also specifically mentions the considerable strength of LT, which
was not pointed out by his predecessors. This can be explained by the fact that
this anatomical element was personally studied by Galen in somatically healthy
young people who died in battle, i.e. physically well-developed warriors and
gladiators (which is currently impossible for ethical reasons). The latest
information on the low mechanical strength of LT, refers, as a rule, to senior
persons (55-58). In his main work on anatomy, On Anatomical Procedures, Galen
gives a more detailed description of the structure of HJ and LT yet:
“As with the arm you examined
the ligaments of the bones, so now examine those of all the exposed joints and
first of the hip. This has one ligament (σύνδεσμον) embracing it
[capsular ligament], as with all joints. A second, hidden in the depths of the
joint [ligamentum teres], ties the head of the femur to the hollow in the
hip-bone [acetabulum]. It is so tough (σκληρός) that it could be
called a “cartilaginous sinew” (νεῦρον χονδρῶδες)” (De anat. adm. II, 10) (41,59).
By the “ligament embracing the
hip” Galen clearly means the HJ capsule (capsula articularis) with the external
ligaments woven into it. The word “tough” describes the tension and high
elastic modulus of LT (57). In the described specimen, Galen encountered LT of
the “cartilage consistence”. Modern histological studies have established that
“near their attachments the structure of ligaments undergoes a transition into
fibrocartilage <...> and the fibroblasts become encapsulated and
resembled chondrocytes” (60).
Galen provides a detailed
description of LT in his work on physiology On the Usefulness of the Parts of
the Body:
“In the femoral joint Nature
created a ligament (σύνδεσμος), which is round,
very strong, extending from the femoral head and connecting in the middle with
the acetabulum, but did not create this in the shoulder joint, arranging it so
that it could perform various movements” (De usu part. XII, 5, 17) (41).
This quotation from Galen
echoes the statement made by Hippocrates in the treatise Instruments of
Redactions (§ 1), where he also compares the anatomical features of HJ and the
shoulder joint. Galen was undoubtedly familiar with this treatise by
Hippocrates, although he left no comment on this work. Calling the ligament
“round” (στρογγύλος) (lat. teres,
rotundum), Galen must have meant not only the cross-sectional shape of LT, but
also the interweaving of thin fibers, the fibrils of its stroma, since the
Greek verb στρογγύλλω also means “to
twist, rotate”. These thin fibers or, more precisely, bundles of fibers, were
observed by Galen in ligaments and nerves.
Two more references to LT are
found in Galenic Commentary on Hippocrates’ On Joints, considered as one of the
earlier works compiled between 177 and 180 AD. In the third chapter of the
first Galen’s comment, we read:
“The femur has a small head
and an elongated neck. It is located in the acetabulum, which is [quite] deep
and surrounded by protruding edges; and at the top of its head [there is] a
strongest ligament (σύνδεσμον ισχυρότατον) connecting with the acetabulum in the deepest
place. That is why the femur is rarely dislocated as opposed to the shoulder
that has no ligament (σύνδεσμον) and does not
enter a deep cavity” (In Hipp. de art. I, 3) (41).
This passage, as the ones
before it, refers to the writings of Hippocrates, namely, to the treatise On
Joints (De artic., 79) and Instruments of Redactions (Vectiar., 42), in which
the articular cavity of the shoulder joint is compared to the one of the HJ
(39). The above quote shows that Galen had a good idea of the structure of HJ
and distinguished acetabular labrum as well as its “deepest place” – acetabular
fossa. He also notes the strength of LT and one of its functions, the retention
of femoral head in acetabulum.
In the fourth Galenic
Commentary on Hippocrates’ On Joints, § 40, entitled “How to correct hip
dislocation when it is dislocated inward,” the author writes this about HJ:
“In this joint, the ligament
[of the femoral head] is extremely strong, rounded and hidden in it, connecting
the top of the femoral head with the deepest inner part of the acetabulum.
Therefore, without even seeing the ligament itself, but based only on this
reasoning, we can understand that it is short: since the hip always rotates -
as Hippocrates said: “it rotates in the pelvic bone” - and never leaves the
acetabulum, the ligament ought to be very short. And so, it is the ligament
that prevents the hip from being dislocated, at least while it is in its
natural state. And not only can the ligament rupture, but also, due to the
abundance of fluid that has unnaturally accumulated in the cavity [joint],
become so stretched that it sometimes allows the femur to dislocate from its
natural place. And if, due to a rupture of the ligament, the hip is dislocated,
then even with immediate reduction it will not be able to remain in its place.
<...> This is how the nature of things teaches us that with a torn
ligament, the reduction of femur cannot remain in its place. It should also be
added that on the outside of the knee joint there are several tendinous
ligaments and in the hip joint there is only this ligament, since neither
anything of this kind, nor any muscles support the joint from the outside.
<...> And Hippocrates himself said at the beginning of this book that
even in bulls it is the hip that get dislocated when they grow old and lose
weight, because when the ligament of the hip is torn, the thigh joint cannot
remain in its place even after reduction, the thing that especially applies to
the emaciated [animals].
Next, let's look at what can
happen if the ligament, weakened due to the abundance of fluid [in the joint],
allows the hip to dislocate, but then is reset. It seems to me that it is quite
obvious that in the presence of fluid the joint will dislocate again, and when
it dries up, it will regain its natural strength. And the fact that dislocation
of the hip can happen due to the fluid can be learned from Hippocrates himself,
who writes in the “Aphorisms” thus: “Whoever, due to the chronic sciatica, has
the femoral head dislocated and reset again, will have an accumulation of mucus
formed there”. And when mucus builds up in the joint, then the ligament softens
and weakens as a result. And it does not matter whether you call it a ligament
(σύνδεσμον) or a connecting sinew (νεῦρον συνδετικόν). For those
ligaments that have a rounded shape like tendons are usually called connecting
sinews by anatomists. And we have already cured this kind of hip dislocation
twice, and it did not dislocate again. Drying medications should be applied
over the joint for a long time until the connective sinew is dry enough to stop
stretching together with the femur extending beyond the edge of the acetabulum
and keep it in its natural position” (In Hipp. de art. IV, 40) (41).
Such an extensive quotation is
provided in view of its exceptional significance. Here Galen describes in
detail the geometric and mechanical properties of LT, its topographic anatomy
and function. Regarding the attachment areas, the author notes that LT connects
with the bones, that is, with the femoral head and the inside of the acetabulum
(In Hipp. de art. IV, 40; cf. ibid. I, 3) (41), undoubtedly meaning acetabular
fossa (lat. fossa acetabuli). Perhaps it is from this treatise that the term
“round ligament” (lat. ligamentum teres, ligamentum rotundum) first entered the
academic vocabulary and is still very much in use.
The author also dwelled on the
pathology, that is, a rupture resulting from a traumatic hip dislocation and
its “weakening” due to accumulation of pathological fluid, possibly implying
synovitis. Galen also informs us of his own successful experience in treating a
(presumably) recurring hip dislocation in children. Here we find, for the first
time in history of medicine, a description of the conservative treatment of LT
pathology. Galen in this case used some “drying medications”, possibly in the
form of compresses or ointment dressings, which, according to his clinical
plan, “dried” the LT, eliminating its hyperelasticity, and was conducive to its
contracting.
Galen’s texts were well known
to the Byzantine medical authors, who composed various kinds of encyclopedic
codices and compendia containing extracts from the writings of ancient
physicians, mainly Hippocrates and Galen. So, for example, Oribasius (IV-V
cent.), when describing the structure of the femur in his essay “Medical
Collections” (Coll. Med. XXV, 19) gives an exact quote from the aforementioned
Galen’s treatise On Bones for Beginners (41).
Important refinements in the
description of the structure of LT are also found in the Pseudo-Galen’s
treatise Introduction, or the Physician:
“The hip has one bone. And its
head, somewhat curved, enters the deep acetabulum of the pelvis; and it is
connected by a sinew (νεύρῳ), growing from the
middle of this cavity and growing into the middle of the femoral head” (Introd.
s. Med. XII) (41,61,62).
It should be noted that in
this case, Pseudo-Galen, in reference to LT, uses not the word σύνδεσμος, which is more characteristic of Galen, but
the old term νεῦρον, which was
employed by his predecessors Hippocrates, Heraclides of Tarentum, Hegetor,
Apollonius of Citium and Rufus of Ephesus. Apparently, Pseudo-Galen was well
versed in the normal anatomy of HJ, as he correctly describes the significant
depth of acetabulum and the attachment of LT to its middle, that is, to the
bottom of acetabular fossa. The latter circumstance is extremely important for
biomechanics of HJ, since only with this type of connection can LT fully
perform its important functions: limiting movements, supporting the pelvis, the
hip abductor muscle group and the upper part of the femoral head (15,17,23).
Another description of LT,
similar to Galen’s, is found in the works of Byzantine physician Theophilus
Protospatharius (circa VII cent.), who, in book V of the treatise On the
Construction of the Human Being, wrote:
“For the sake of this, the
kindness and creation of God grew from the bottom of the acetabulum a round
sinew (νεῦρον), a cartilaginous ligament (σύνδεσμον χονδρώδη), growing into the
head of the femur and holding it there to avoid dislocation” (De corp. hum.
fabr. XIII, 204).
In the above passage, Theophilus
Protospatharius does not provide any new information, but, undoubtedly under
the influence of Galen, uses the epithet “round” and “cartilaginous”,
describing the beginning of LT from the bottom of acetabulum, and also agreeing
with its role of holding the femoral head and preventing dislocation.
CONCLUSIONS
Ancient physicians wrote
predominantly in Greek, with medical literature in Latin being presented but
scarcely, and terminology developed poorly (63). The term ligamentum in the anatomical
meaning of “ligament” did not yet exist Latin literature. The word nervus,
“sinew”, was used to denote ligaments in Latin. By the end of the V century the
four basic terms for LT that Galen mentions had already been known: νεῦρον (sinew), σύνδεσμος (ligament), νεῦρον συνδετικόν (connecting sinew)
and νεῦρον χονδρῶδες (cartilaginous
sinew).
The physicians of the
Classical period clearly established that LT was present in both humans and
animals, charted its topographic anatomy, as well as established its main
mechanical and geometric properties. In particular, they noted that it “is
located in the acetabulum”, and is “deeply hidden in the joint”, for some
authors it “grows from the femoral head”, for others it “starts from the middle
of the acetabulum”. These physicians also drew attention to its mechanical
properties, that is, very high strength, resilience, consistence (cartilage
density) and, at the same time, flexibility, allowing movements of the femoral
head. The geometric features were also indicated, in particular, that LT has a
short length, and in shape it is “round”. The latter characteristic described
by Galen subsequently led to the emergence of the well-known Latin term for LT,
i.e. “round ligament”, which is still applied. Regarding the role of LT, it was
noted that it connects the acetabulum with the femoral head and prevents its
dislocation, that is, limits rotational and forward movements in HJ.
In Palestine of the biblical
times, it was believed that LT provided a normal gait, participating in the
organization of this type of human locomotion, and an injury to it caused
lameness. Ancient medical authors also knew about its traumatic rupture, and
identified other types of LT pathology, in particular, “soaking”, weakening
(possibly a dystrophic change), stretching (that is, lengthening), suggested
the possibility of its constriction (in other words, shortening) and drying
(dehydration with increasing elasticity). The factors leading to pathological
changes in LT were identified as trauma, namely hip dislocation, exhaustion,
advanced age, and an excessive accumulation of “fluid” in HJ. For the treatment
of LT pathology, the application of drying compresses was used. An injury to LT
was seen as the cause of recurring hip dislocation. It was regarding this issue
that the first correspondence discussion on LT took place, lasting five
centuries and involving Heraclides of Tarentum, Hegetor, Apollonius of Citium
and Galen of Pergamon.
STRENGTHS &
WEAKNESSES
Strengths
Our work based on an
interdisciplinary approach, allowing us to propose a combination of linguistic
and medical analysis of various Greek and Latin texts containing references to
ligamentum teres. A linguistic analysis has enabled us to trace the
transformation of the term from 5 cent. BC to 3 cent. AD, as well as the
history of the term, medical contexts of its usage, its etymology and its early
synonyms. Due to descriptive study of different sources, we have created a new
field of researching and new questions to acquire a better understanding of how
ancient authors considered normal and pathological anatomy of the ligamentum
teres, its physical and geometric features to make possible a description of
the conservative treatment of its pathology.
Weaknesses
Works of some ancient authors
(Heraclides of Tarentum, Hegetor), which we have considered as genuine,
preserved only in short fragments and quotations by the later writers, so that
the genuineness of these works and our conclusions are still in question, and
the information we have extracted from them is often suggestive rather than
definitive. Not all of the passages we quoted (such as Galenus In Hipp. De art.
IV, 40, ed. Kuhn XVIII A: 731-736) have been published in modern critical
editions; an English translation of these passages are our own. Some authors
reiterate or rethink the concepts of their predecessors, but we considered it
necessary to present a complete collection of the quotations, providing them
with comments.
CONFLICT OF
INTEREST
The Authors declare that they
have no conflict of interest.
LIST OF
ABBREVIATIONS
Apollonius
In Hipp. de art. – In Hippocratis de articulis commentarius
Aristoteles
Hist. anim. – Historia animalium
Celsus
De med. – De medicina
Galenus
De anat. adm. – De anatomicis administrationibus
De loc. aff. – De locis
affectis
De motu musc. – De motu musculorum
De usu part. – De usu partium
In Hipp. de art. – In Hippocratis librum de articulis et
Galeni in eum commentarii IV
Hippocrates
De artic. – De articulis
De loc. in hom. – De locis in
homine
Vectiar. – Vectiarius
Oribasius
Coll. med. – Collectiones medicae
Plinius Major
Hist. nat. – Historia naturalis
Ps.-Galenus
Introd. s. Med. – Introductio seu Medicus
Theophilus Protospatharius
De corp. hum. fabr. – De corporis humani fabrica
REFERENCES
1. Netter F. Atlas of human
anatomy. 6th ed. Philadelphia; Saunders Elsevier 2011;474.
2. Waugh A, Grant A. Ross
& Wilson Anatomy and physiology in health and illness. Edinburg [etc.];
Elsevier Health Sciences 2014;418.
3. Cerezal L, Arnaiz J, Canga
A, et al. Emerging topics on the hip: ligamentum teres and hip
microinstability. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3745–3754.
4. Martin HD, Hatem MA, Kivlan
BR, Martin RL. Function of the ligamentum teres in limiting hip rotation: a
cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(9):1085–1091.
5. Perumal V, Woodley SJ,
Nicholson HD. Ligament of the head of femur: A Comprehensive Review of its
Anatomy, Embryology, and Potential Function. Clin Anat. 2015;19(2):247–255.
6. Brady AW, Mikula JD, Chahla
J, et al. Anatomic analysis of the native ligamentum teres. J Hip Preserv Surg.
2016;3(1):hnw030.012.
7. Arhipov SV. Funkciya
svyazki golovki bedrennoj kosti: obzor lit. Genij
ortopedii. 2006;4:105–107. [in Russ.]
8. Wenger DR, Miyanji F, Mahar
A, Oka R. The mechanical properties of the ligamentum teres: a pilot study to
assess its potential for improving stability in children's hip surgery. J
Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(4):408–410.
9. Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ,
Henderson PC, Miyanji F. Ligamentum teres maintenance and transfer as a
stabilizer in open reduction for pediatric hip dislocation: surgical technique
and early clinical results. J Child Orthop. 2008;2(3):177–185.
10. Lampert C. Läsionen des
lig. capitis femoris: pathologie und therapie. Arthroskopie.
2009;22(4):293–298.
11. Sutton JB. The nature of
certain ligaments. J Anat Physio. 1884;18:225–238.
12. Kapandji IA. The
physiology of the ligamentum teres. In: Kapandji IA, Ed. The physiology of the
joints. Vol. 2. 2-nd ed. New York; Churchill Livingstone 1978.
13. Chen HH, Li KC, Li AFY, et
al. Effects of ligamentum teres on the hip stability. Biomed Eng Appl Basis
& Comm. 1994;6:276–279.
14. Rao J, Zhou YX, Villar RN.
Injury to the ligamentum teres. Mechanism, findings, and results of treatment.
Clin Sports Med. 2001;20(4):791–799.
15. Arkhipov SV. On the role
of the ligamentum capitis femoris in the maintenance of different types of
erect posture. Hum Physiol. 2008;34(1):79–85.
16. Dodds MK, Lee J, McCormack
D. Transarticular stabilization of the immature femoral head: assessment of a
novel surgical approach to the dislocating pediatric hip in a porcine model. J
Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(1):36–42.
17. Arkhipov SV, Zagorodny NV,
Skvortsov DV. Ligamentum capitis femoris a pilot an experimental study. Am J
Biomed Sci & Res. 2019;5(2):92–94.
18. Bardakos NV, Villar RN.
The ligamentum teres of the adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009;91(1):8–15.
PubMed
19. Cerezal L, Kassarjian A,
Canga A, et al. Anatomy, biomechanics, imaging, and management of ligamentum
teres injuries. Radiographics. 2010;30(6);1637–1651.
20. Botser IB, Martin DE,
Stout CE, Domb BG. Tears of the ligamentum teres: prevalence in hip arthroscopy
using 2 classification systems. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(1)(Suppl):117S–125S.
21. Byrd JW, Jones KS.
Traumatic rupture of the ligamentum teres as a source of hip pain. Arthroscopy.
2004;20(4):385–391.
22. Haviv B, O'Donnell J.
Arthroscopic debridement of the isolated Ligamentum Teres rupture. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc: Off J ESSKA. 2011;19(9):1510–1513.
23. Arkhipov SV. Svyazka
golovki bedrennoi kosti. Funktsiya i rol' v patogeneze koksartroza.
Saarbrucken; Lambert Academic Publishing 2013. [in Russ.]
24. O’Donnell J, Klaber I,
Takla A. Ligamentum teres reconstruction: indications, technique and minimum
1-year results in nine patients. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020;0(0):1–7.
25. Arkhipov SV, Skvortsov DV.
Ligamentum capitis femoris: first written mentions. MLTJ. 2019;9(2):156–164.
26. O'Donnell JM, Pritchard M,
Salas AP, Singh PJ. The ligamentum teres - its increasing importance. J Hip
Preserv Surg. 2014;1(1):3–11.
27. Rosinsky PJ, Shapira J,
Lall AC, Domb BG. All About the Ligamentum Teres: From Biomechanical Role to
Surgical Reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28(8):e328–e339.
28. Padulo J, Oliva F,
Frizziero A, Maffulli N. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal – Basic
principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2018
update. MLTJ 2018;8(3):305–307.
29. Shchedrovickij D. Vvedenie
v Vethij Zavet. I. Kniga Bytiya. Moskva; Terevinf 1994. [in Russ.]
30. Haudebert P (Ed.). Le
Pentateuque: Débats et recherches. XIVe congrès de l’ACFEB, Angers (1991) (coll.
Lectio divina, 151). Paris; Le Cerf
1992.
31. Bräumer H. Das erste Buch
Mose. Bd. I. Wuppertaler Studienbibel. Reihe Altes Testament. Berlin;
Evangelische Versandbuchhandlung O. Ekelmann Nachf 1986.
32. Brown F. The new
Brown-Driver-Broggs-Gesenius Hebrew and English Lexicon. Peabody; Hendrickson
Publishers 1979:161;674–675.
33. Jamieson R, Fausset AR,
Brown D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. Vol. I.
Hartford; 1871.
34. The Pulpit Commentary. /
Ed. by H.D.M. Spence and J.S. Exell. Vol. I. New York, Toronto; Funk &
Wagnalls Company 1880.
35. A Concise Hebrew and
Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. / By W.L. Holladay. Leiden; Brill 1988.
36. Exposition of the Old and
New Testament. / Ed. by J. Gill. Vol. 1. London; 1748–1763.
37. Preuss J. Biblical and
Talmudic Medicine. Transl. and ed. by Dr. F. Rosner. New York [etc.]; A Jason
Aronson Book, Rowman & Littlefeld Publishers 2004.
38. André J. Le vocabulaire
latin de l’anatomie. Paris; Belles letters 1991:208–209.
39. Oeuvres complètes
d’Hippocrate / Par É. Littré. Vol. 1–10. Paris; 1839–1861 (repr. Amsterdam,
1961–1973).
40. von Staden H. Herophilus.
The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge [etc.]; Cambridge University
Press 1989:256.
41. Kühn CG. Claudii Galeni
opera omnia. Leipzig; 1821-1833 (repr. Hildesheim, 1965).
42. Garofalo I. Erasistrati
fragmenta. Pisa; Gardini 1988.
43. Marcovecchio E. Dizionario
etimologico storico dei termini medici. Firenze; Festina lente 1993:578.
44. Sutton JB. The nature of ligaments. Part IV. J Anat Physiol. 1885;20(Pt 1):38.1–75.
45. Welcker H. Nachweis eines
ligamentum interarticulare (“teres”) humeri, sowie eines Lig. sessile Femoris.
Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1877;2:98–107.
46. Kolts I, Busch LC, Tomusk
H, et al. Macroscopical anatomy of the so-called “rotator interval”. A cadaver
study on 19 shoulder joints. Ann Anat. 2002;184(1):9–14.
47. Reuther F. Anatomie,
Biomechanik und Klassifikation der Schultergelenkverletzung. Trauma
Berufskrankh. 2006;8(3):S241–S246.
48. Sabat D, Singh D, Kumar V,
Gupta A. Open perineal dislocation of hip in a child. Eur J Orthop Surg
Traumatol. 2009;19:277–279.
49. Muzaffar N, Hafeez A,
Bashir N, Singh S. Open anterior hip dislocation in a young adult with exposed
femoral head and no neurovascular damage. Malays Orthop J. 2012;6(1):40–42.
50. Arkhipov SV, Prolygina IV. Galen o vyvikhe bedra i svyazke golovki bedrennoi kosti. Opera medica historica. Trudy po istorii meditsiny. Al'manakh ROIM. Vypusk 4. Moskva; 2019:89–96. [in Russ.]
51. Schaumkel JV, Villar RN.
Healing of the ruptured ligamentum teres after hip dislocation-an arthroscopic
finding. HIP Int. 2009;19(1):64–66.
52. Davarinos N, Bonvin A,
Christofilopoulos P. Ligamentum teres reattachment post-surgical dislocation of
the hip: a case report. Regenerative capacity reaffirming its greater role in
hip stability and function? J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;4(4):337–340.
53. Kollesch J, Kudlien F.
Apollonii Citiensis In Hippocratis De articulis commentaries; ediderunt
J.Kollesch et F.Kudlien, in linguam Germanicam transtulerunt J.Kollesch et
D.Nickel. Berolini; in aedibus Academiae Scientiarum 1965.
54. Daremberg Ch, Ruelle Ch.
Oeuvres de Rufus d'Ephèse. Paris; 1879.
55. Podrushnyak EP. Vozrastnye
izmeneniya sustavov cheloveka. Kiev; Zdorov‘ya 1972. [In Russ.]
56. Chen HH, Li AF, Li KC, Wu
JJ, Chen TS, Lee MC. Adaptations of ligamentum teres in ischemic necrosis of
human femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328:268–275.
57. Philippon MJ, Rasmussen
MT, Turnbull TL, et al. Structural Properties of the Native Ligamentum Teres.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(12):2325967114561962.
58. Perumal V, Scholze M,
Hammer N, Woodley S, Nicholson H. Load‐deformation properties of the ligament
of the head of femur in situ. Clin Anat. 2019:1–9.
59. Singer C. Galen: On
Anatomical Procedures (I-IX 6). London [etc.]; Oxford University Press 1956.
60. Ham AW. Histology.
Philadelphia, Toronto; J.B. Lippincott Company 1974. InternetArchive
61. Everett N. The Alphabet of
Galen: Pharmacy from Antiquity to the Middle Ages: a Critical Edition of the
Latin text with English translation and commentary. Toronto [etc.]; University
of Toronto Press 2012.
62. Petit C. What does
pseudo-Galen tell us that Galen does not? Ancient medical schools in the Roman
Empire. In Philosophical themes in Galen. Eds. P. Adamson, R. Hansbeger, J.
Wilberding. London; The Institute of Classical Studies University of London
2014:269–290.
63. Langslow DR. Medical Latin in the Roman Empire. Oxford; University
Press 2000.
Authors &
Affiliations
Author:
S.V. Arkhipov (1)
I.V. Prolygina (2)
Organization:
1. Laboratory of Clinical
Physiology and Biomechanics, Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Priorov
National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopaedics of the
Ministry of Health of the Russion Federacion, Moscow, Russia
2. A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow
State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia
External links
Arkhipov SV, Prolygina IV. Ancient Textual Sources on Ligamentum Teres: Context and Transmission. MLTJ. 2020;10(3):536-546. doi:10.32098/mltj.03.2020.27 [mltj.online , mltj.online(PDF) , researchgate.net]
.
.
NB! The first publication did not contain the drawing in the annotation.
HISTORY OF THE STUDY
Comments
Post a Comment